Post fix

It works again!

@Builder
public record MyRecord(String myField) {
}

Pre fix

It was a known IntelliJ bug. There was, however, a workaround:

public record MyRecord(String myField) {
    @Builder public MyRecord {}
} 

Important: Once you insert the @builder inside the record, you must remove the @builder above it

Answer from yoni on Stack Overflow
🌐
JetBrains
youtrack.jetbrains.com › issue › IDEA-266513
Problem with lombok @Builder and record. : IDEA-266513
April 6, 2021 - {{ (>_<) }} This version of your browser is not supported. Try upgrading to the latest stable version. Something went seriously wrong
Discussions

[BUG] @lombok.Builder.Default does not work on records
Applying @Defaultto a record class fails to compile. @lombok.Builder record Foo ( // Fails to compile. More on github.com
🌐 github.com
2
November 14, 2023
Java Records and Lombok annotation - IntelliJ - Stack Overflow
Just trying a hands-on the java.lang.Record. I have gone through the documentation and the JEP-359 for some understanding. So upon reading about the implicit declaration of the constructor I though... More on stackoverflow.com
🌐 stackoverflow.com
InnerBuilder, an IntelliJ IDEA plugin that adds a 'Builder' action to the Generate menu (Alt+Insert) which generates an inner builder class as described in Effective Java.
It's a good starting point. Typically if I am going to create a builder, the builder will have a bit of validation logic erc_, but this could save time More on reddit.com
🌐 r/java
17
51
December 5, 2013
lombok - Java Record with @Builder.Default - Stack Overflow
I'm wondering is there any way to combine java record with lombok's @Builder.Default? Let's consider an example with properties object for new file creation. Before java 14 @Value @Builder public c... More on stackoverflow.com
🌐 stackoverflow.com
🌐
GitHub
github.com › projectlombok › lombok › issues › 2851
[FEATURE] record support for @Builder · Issue #2851 · projectlombok/lombok
May 21, 2021 - @Builder record Rtest(boolean one, String two, int three) { } @Test public void builderTest() { Rtest.builder().<< no methods?
Author   projectlombok
🌐
Project Lombok
projectlombok.org › features › Builder
@Builder
By annotating one of the parameters (if annotating a method or constructor with @Builder) or fields (if annotating a class with @Builder) with the @Singular annotation, lombok will treat that builder node as a collection, and it generates 2 'adder' methods instead of a 'setter' method.
🌐
Medium
brett-fisher.medium.com › java-records-and-lombok-in-practise-37447cd22415
Java Records and Lombok in practise | by Brett Fisher | Medium
September 28, 2021 - See here for code example for constructor based validation using Lombok. See here for code example for constructor based validation using Record. See here for code example for constructor based validation using standard Java Class. The current implementation for Records do not account for building objects fluently, i.e. var vehicle = Vehicle.builder() .id(UUID.randomUUID()) .engine(Engine.builder.build()) .build();
🌐
Softwaregarden
softwaregarden.dev › en › posts › new-java › records › vs-lombok-yet-again-with-builder-pattern
Java Records tortured with Lombok yet again (builder edition) – SoftwareGarden.dev
April 15, 2021 - Or… we can misbehave and try to (ab)use Lombok yet another time. ;-) ... and we’d like to create instances using builder, as it sounds more fluent. Adding @Builder doesn’t show any errors. However, the only method generated in BuilderRecord.builder() is build(). Not quite what we expected. ... record BuilderRecord(int a, String b, Double c) { BuilderRecord() { } public static BuilderRecordBuilder builder() { return new BuilderRecordBuilder(); } public static class BuilderRecordBuilder { BuilderRecordBuilder() { } public BuilderRecord build() { return new BuilderRecord(); } public String toString() { return "BuilderRecord.BuilderRecordBuilder()"; } } }
🌐
GitHub
github.com › projectlombok › lombok › issues › 3547
[BUG] @lombok.Builder.Default does not work on records · Issue #3547 · projectlombok/lombok
November 14, 2023 - Applying @Defaultto a record class fails to compile. @lombok.Builder record Foo ( // Fails to compile. @lombok.Builder.Default String bar = "ok" ) {} The expected behaviour is that works as in a normal class Lombok version: 1.18.30 Platf...
Author   projectlombok
Find elsewhere
🌐
JetBrains
youtrack.jetbrains.com › issue › IDEA-266513 › Problem-with-lombok-Builder-and-record
Jetbrains
May 7, 2022 - {{ (>_<) }} This version of your browser is not supported. Try upgrading to the latest stable version. Something went seriously wrong
🌐
javathinking
javathinking.com › blog › java-record-with-builder-default
Java Record with Lombok @Builder.Default: How to Fix Compiler Errors and Set Default Values — javathinking.com
Why It Happens: Records require all components to be initialized. Since age has no explicit initializer (e.g., = 18), the canonical constructor can’t initialize it, leading to a compile error. Scenario: You use @Builder.Default with an initializer, but the builder still initializes the field to null (for objects) or a primitive default (e.g., 0 for int). ... import lombok.Builder; import lombok.Builder.Default; @Builder public record User(String name, @Default int age = 18) {}
🌐
Baeldung
baeldung.com › home › java › core java › java record vs. lombok
Java Record vs. Lombok | Baeldung
January 16, 2024 - If we compare the two, we can notice that using the builder pattern is favorable, leading to cleaner code. In conclusion, records are better for smaller objects. Though, for objects with many fields, the lack of creational patterns will make Lombok’s @Builder a better option.
🌐
How to do in Java
howtodoinjava.com › home › java basics › builder pattern for java records
Builder Pattern for Java Records
August 6, 2024 - Note that the record is still usable without the builder, but the builder provides an additional and flexible way to create a record instance. Lombok is a useful library for minimizing boilerplate code for features such as implementing the builder pattern in a class or record.
🌐
DZone
dzone.com › coding › java › migrating from lombok to records in java
Migrating From Lombok to Records in Java
December 28, 2023 - For Java records, we create a static nested Builder class within the record. The builder class has methods for setting each field and a build method to create an instance of the record. This provides a similar fluent API as seen in the Lombok example. Using builders with records or Lombok provides a convenient and readable way to construct instances, especially when dealing with classes with multiple fields...
🌐
Medium
medium.com › thefreshwrites › migrating-from-lombok-to-records-in-java-fa2ece28bd68
Migrating From Lombok to Records in Java | by Samuel Catalano | The Fresh Writes | Medium
January 25, 2024 - In the Lombok, the @Builder annotation creates a builder class tailored to the FilmWithLombok class. This builder offers a seamless interface for constructing instances, incorporating optional and chainable setter methods. public record ...