🌐
Stack Exchange
softwareengineering.stackexchange.com › questions › 410234 › what-is-the-worst-case-time-complexity-for-only-the-divide-portion-of-the-merge
What is the worst case Time Complexity for only the Divide Portion of the Merge Sort Algorithm? - Software Engineering Stack Exchange
May 17, 2020 - function mergeSort(unsortedArray) ... ignores half of the array in every iteration the answer would easily be arrived at as log2 n. Now I would like to calculate the Worst Case Time Complexity for only the portion which splits ...
Discussions

"What is the complexity of Merge Sort?"
Q6.Arrange the following time complexities in increasing order. (A). Bubble sort (worst case) (8). Deleting head node in singly linked list (C). Binary search (D). Worst case of merge sort More on testbook.com
🌐 testbook.com
1
1707
April 27, 2021
Understanding merge sort Big O complexity
Splitting the array doesn't meaningfully change the runtime. To be specific, "splitting the array" is actually the act of determining the midpoint and then making the two recursive calls. It takes only constant time to determine where the middle of the array is ((low + mid) / 2). This doesn't change mergesort's runtime. A simple proof is that every "split" of the array is accompanied by a corresponding "merge" operation (since if you split the array into two pieces, you'll have to merge it back). So as an accounting trick, you can just book the cost of the split into the corresponding merge ==> this effectively makes splitting the array free, while making the merge operation slightly more expensive. (However, the merge operation will still be O(n), which is why it doesn't affect anything.) More on reddit.com
🌐 r/learnprogramming
3
4
June 26, 2022
algorithm - Best Case For Merge Sort - Stack Overflow
If the comparison yields <= then you can skip the merge phase for this pair of slices. With this modification, a fully sorted array will sort much faster, with a linear complexity, making it the best case, and a partially sorted array will behave better as well. More on stackoverflow.com
🌐 stackoverflow.com
algorithm - Why is merge sort worst case run time O (n log n)? - Stack Overflow
Bring the best of human thought and AI automation together at your work. Explore Stack Internal ... The Merge Sort use the Divide-and-Conquer approach to solve the sorting problem. First, it divides the input in half using recursion. After dividing, it sort the halfs and merge them into one sorted output. See the figure · It means that is better to sort half of your problem first and do a simple merge subroutine. So it is important to know the complexity ... More on stackoverflow.com
🌐 stackoverflow.com
🌐
Quora
quora.com › What-is-the-time-complexity-of-the-bubble-sort-and-merge-sort-algorithms
What is the time complexity of the bubble sort and merge sort algorithms? - Quora
In the most optimistic sorted case, BubbleSort is a speedy O(n), whereas MergeSort is a constant O(NLogN). In the average and worst case (reverse-sorted), BubbleSort is considered O(n²).
🌐
Scribd
scribd.com › document › 951413516 › Analysis-of-Merge-Sort-Time-Complexity
Analysis of Merge Sort Time Complexity | PDF
JavaScript is disabled in your browser · Please enable JavaScript to proceed · A required part of this site couldn’t load. This may be due to a browser extension, network issues, or browser settings. Please check your connection, disable any ad blockers, or try using a different browser
🌐
W3Schools
w3schools.com › dsa › dsa_algo_selectionsort.php
DSA Selection Sort
The red dashed line represents the theoretical time complexity \(O(n^2)\). Blue crosses appear when you run the simulation. The blue crosses show how many operations are needed to sort an array of a certain size. ... The most significant difference from Bubble sort that we can notice in this simulation is that best and worst case ...
🌐
Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org › wiki › Quicksort
Quicksort - Wikipedia
1 week ago - Merge sort's main advantages are that it is a stable sort and has excellent worst-case performance. The main disadvantage of merge sort is that it is an out-of-place algorithm, so when operating on arrays, efficient implementations require O(n) auxiliary space (vs.
Find elsewhere
🌐
Sarthaks eConnect
sarthaks.com › 2387927 › what-will-be-the-best-case-time-complexity-of-merge-sort
What will be the best case time complexity of merge sort?
February 18, 2022 - Join Sarthaks live online classes for 7-12, CBSE, State Board, JEE & NEET courses led by experienced expert teachers. Learn, Practice Test, Analyse and ace your exam.
🌐
Python
docs.python.org › 3 › library › heapq.html
heapq — Heap queue algorithm
However, there are other representations which are more efficient overall, yet the worst cases might be terrible. Heaps are also very useful in big disk sorts. You most probably all know that a big sort implies producing “runs” (which are pre-sorted sequences, whose size is usually related to the amount of CPU memory), followed by a merging passes for these runs, which merging is often very cleverly organised [1]. It is very important that the initial sort produces the longest runs possible.
🌐
GeeksforGeeks
geeksforgeeks.org › dsa › time-and-space-complexity-analysis-of-merge-sort
Time and Space Complexity Analysis of Merge Sort - GeeksforGeeks
March 14, 2024 - . . = 2k * T(N/2k) + k * N * constant · It can be divided maximum until there is one element left. So, then N/2k = 1. k = log2N · T(N) = N * T(1) + N * log2N * constant = N + N * log2N · Therefore the time complexity is O(N * log2N).
🌐
Codecademy
codecademy.com › article › time-complexity-of-merge-sort
Time Complexity of Merge Sort: A Detailed Analysis | Codecademy
Despite the fact that no rearrangement is needed, the algorithm does not skip the merge phase. It performs comparisons and combines the subarrays, resulting in O(n log n) time complexity.
🌐
Hero Vired
herovired.com › home › learning-hub › blogs › space-complexity-of-merge-sort
Time and Space Complexity of Merge Sort - Hero Vired
June 27, 2024 - In the best case, it has a time complexity of O(n). Thus, Merge Sort is preferable for larger data collections due to its O(n log n) time complexity.
🌐
Reddit
reddit.com › r/learnprogramming › understanding merge sort big o complexity
r/learnprogramming on Reddit: Understanding merge sort Big O complexity
June 26, 2022 -

I'm going to be referring to this image. So the Big O of merge sort is nlogn.

So in the example I posted above, n = 8 so the Big O should be 8log(8) = 16. I think it's because in the first green level, we go through 8 items then merge and we do the same thing for the second green level so 8+8 = 16. But then I thought when we split the initial array(the purple steps) doesn't that add to the time complexity as well?

Top answer
1 of 3
1
Splitting the array doesn't meaningfully change the runtime. To be specific, "splitting the array" is actually the act of determining the midpoint and then making the two recursive calls. It takes only constant time to determine where the middle of the array is ((low + mid) / 2). This doesn't change mergesort's runtime. A simple proof is that every "split" of the array is accompanied by a corresponding "merge" operation (since if you split the array into two pieces, you'll have to merge it back). So as an accounting trick, you can just book the cost of the split into the corresponding merge ==> this effectively makes splitting the array free, while making the merge operation slightly more expensive. (However, the merge operation will still be O(n), which is why it doesn't affect anything.)
2 of 3
1
Big O notation does not care about the specific constant factor. This allows you to ignore a lot of implementation details when describing an algorithm and still be able to determine Big O complexity of it. As the other comment said, you can split an array by just change the starting and ending point, which would be constant. But even if you literally copy the entire array into 2 arrays (doing it the inefficient way), the Big O complexity is still O(nlog(n)). If you are still confused, this is a fully rigorous proof of time complexity of merge sort: The recurrence relation for Big O in merge sort is T(2k )<=2T(2k-1 )+C2k . That means to sort 2k items, you need to sort 2k-1 items twice, then add in an addition time for pre-processing and post-processing, which is at most constant multiple of 2k (that constant is C, and we don't care about specific value of C except that it's >=1, and by "constant" we mean it's independent from k). Set U(2k )=2U(2k-1 )+C2k and U(20 )=1. Then T(2k )<=U(2k ) so U is an upper bound of T. And you can compute U exactly: U(2k )=C2k +2U(2k-1 )=C2k +2C2k-1 +2U(2k -2 )=...=C2k +21 C2k-1 +...+2k-1 C21 +2k C20 +2k U(20 )=kC2k +2k so T(n)<=kC2k +2k ifn=2k . If n is not a power of 2, you can round up to the next power of 2 (so that 2k-1
🌐
Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org › wiki › Merge_sort
Merge sort - Wikipedia
2 weeks ago - These numbers are equal to or slightly smaller than (n ⌈lg n⌉ − 2⌈lg n⌉ + 1), which is between (n lg n − n + 1) and (n lg n + n + O(lg n)). Merge sort's best case takes about half as many iterations as its worst case.
🌐
Quora
quora.com › What-is-the-time-complexity-of-Merge-Sort-and-why-does-it-have-this-complexity
What is the time complexity of Merge Sort and why does it have this complexity? - Quora
Answer (1 of 2): The split step of Merge Sort will take O(n) instead of O(log(n)). If we have the runtime function of split step: T(n) = 2T(n/2) + O(1) with T(n) is the runtime for input size n, 2 is the number of new problems and n/2 is the ...
🌐
Scaler
scaler.com › home › topics › what is the ​​time complexity of merge sort?
What is the ​​Time Complexity of Merge Sort? - Scaler Topics
April 20, 2024 - The best case scenario occurs when the elements are already sorted in ascending order. If two sorted arrays of size n need to be merged, the minimum number of comparisons will be n.
🌐
Alma Better
almabetter.com › bytes › articles › merge-sort-time-complexity
What is the Time Complexity of Merge Sort Algorithm?
June 12, 2024 - In Merge Sort, the best, average, and worst-case time complexities are all O(n log n).
Top answer
1 of 9
77

The Merge Sort use the Divide-and-Conquer approach to solve the sorting problem. First, it divides the input in half using recursion. After dividing, it sort the halfs and merge them into one sorted output. See the figure

It means that is better to sort half of your problem first and do a simple merge subroutine. So it is important to know the complexity of the merge subroutine and how many times it will be called in the recursion.

The pseudo-code for the merge sort is really simple.

# C = output [length = N]
# A 1st sorted half [N/2]
# B 2nd sorted half [N/2]
i = j = 1
for k = 1 to n
    if A[i] < B[j]
        C[k] = A[i]
        i++
    else
        C[k] = B[j]
        j++

It is easy to see that in every loop you will have 4 operations: k++, i++ or j++, the if statement and the attribution C = A|B. So you will have less or equal to 4N + 2 operations giving a O(N) complexity. For the sake of the proof 4N + 2 will be treated as 6N, since is true for N = 1 (4N +2 <= 6N).

So assume you have an input with N elements and assume N is a power of 2. At every level you have two times more subproblems with an input with half elements from the previous input. This means that at the the level j = 0, 1, 2, ..., lgN there will be 2^j subproblems with an input of length N / 2^j. The number of operations at each level j will be less or equal to

2^j * 6(N / 2^j) = 6N

Observe that it doens't matter the level you will always have less or equal 6N operations.

Since there are lgN + 1 levels, the complexity will be

O(6N * (lgN + 1)) = O(6N*lgN + 6N) = O(n lgN)

References:

  • Coursera course Algorithms: Design and Analysis, Part 1
2 of 9
45

On a "traditional" merge sort, each pass through the data doubles the size of the sorted subsections. After the first pass, the file will be sorted into sections of length two. After the second pass, length four. Then eight, sixteen, etc. up to the size of the file.

It's necessary to keep doubling the size of the sorted sections until there's one section comprising the whole file. It will take lg(N) doublings of the section size to reach the file size, and each pass of the data will take time proportional to the number of records.

🌐
Baeldung
baeldung.com › home › algorithms › sorting › when will the worst case of merge sort occur?
When Will the Worst Case of Merge Sort Occur? | Baeldung on Computer Science
March 18, 2024 - In the last step, the two halves of the original array are merged so that the complete array is sorted: This algorithm loops through times and the time complexity of every loop is , so the time complexity of the entire function is . The complexity of the entire algorithm is the sum of the complexity of two steps which is . This happens to be the worst case ...