I saw one website that listed the nuna pipa low and even the uppababy mesa mid range. But chicco always gets a high rating. Can anyone debunk these?
The child car seat finder tool published by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (https://www.nhtsa.gov/vehicle-safety/car-seats-and-booster-seats) is returning potentially dangerous results, contradicting information shown on the rest of the page and not functioning as one would expect.
As you can see from the linked screenshot, the tool does not even take into consideration the height and weight parameters and they are being completely ignored when generating a recommendation. It is dangerous that this is happening, providing incorrect child car seat information like this, especially from a federal organization that is often seen as a source of truth. Was this tool tested in any way before being released to the public? This is very troubling and makes me a bit mad. How much taxpayer money was spent on this tool? Not cool. And not safe.
https://imgur.com/usjFU6l
The tool's chart also changes the recommended age range for a rear-facing seat from Birth - 3 years to Birth - 2 years when you run the tool.
Original recommendation shown if you scroll up above the tool on the page: https://www.nhtsa.gov/sites/nhtsa.gov/files/carseatrec_age_size_bars_static_1000px.png
Edit: I've reached out to the NHTSA about this, haven't heard anything just yet.