https://www.researchgate.net/post/which_software_is_known_to_be_the_best_for_analyzing_the_qualitative_data Answer from Jaydip Datta on researchgate.net
Lumivero
lumivero.com › home › comparing qda software: maxqda vs nvivo
Comparing QDA software: MAXQDA vs NVivo
April 8, 2025 - NVivo stands out with its real-time collaboration capabilities through NVivo Collaboration Cloud. This feature enables multiple users to work simultaneously on the same project, track changes, and manage contributions seamlessly.
Videos
01:23:50
How does QualCoder compare with NVivo, ATLAS.ti, MAXQDA? - YouTube
14:03
Best tools for qualitative data analysis - YouTube
01:12:38
‘Commonalities between NVivo, MAXQDA and other similar data ...
02:13
MAXQDA - The #1 Software for Qualitative and Mixed Methods Data ...
Delve
delvetool.com › blog › maxqda-vs-nvivo-vs-delve
MAXQDA vs. NVivo vs. Delve: Comparing Top QDA Software — Delve
January 14, 2025 - NVivo requires device-specific, annual licensing that can be frustrating for researchers. Users also report bugs in the software that risk potential data loss and research setbacks. ... Researchers with ample funds who are managing large datasets, especially if working independently. ... While MAXQDA shines in its versatility and mixed-method capabilities, user reviews highlight areas for improvement.
Capterra
capterra.com › home › qualitative data analysis software › nvivo vs maxqda
Compare NVivo vs MAXQDA 2025 | Capterra
I am experiencing difficulty with download the NVIVO software.See full review · 1 / 7 · NextView Reviews · Vaios K · PhD Candidate · An expanding develpopment of functionalities, graphics and tool improvements gave me better understanding for the qualitative research that wasn't possible for me before.See full review · Natasha W · Consultant · If you aren't a student scholar, the cost can be expensive.See full review · Anil K · Researcher · However, MAXQDA does offer various licensing options and discounts for students and academic institutions, which helps alleviate this concern to some extent.See full review ·
Phddiscussions
phddiscussions.in › question › nvivo-vs-maxqda-for-quantitative-data-analysis › 761026
Nvivo vs MAXQDA for quantitative data analysis - PhD Discussions
Nvivo is a good tool, but I would suggest you to go with MAXQDA tool. This is because, MAXQDA can handle a similar range of data types letting, colour coding, organisation and retrieval of the data.
Top answer 1 of 4
2
The major qualitative data analysis software packages all have very similar basic functions. To see which one is more comfortable for you, I suggest that you look at the training videos for each of the two packages.
One recent recent development is that MAXQDA has an option for using ChatGPT to assist in the data analysis process, while NVivo does not have this option.
2 of 4
0
All these are proprietary tools for qualitative data analysis with some or the other difference in visualization of output style based on the selected analysis plan. I think, referring to the kind of research papers you are reading might help you by understanding what tool those authors used. Opps, so logical! Sometimes just doing and upscaling our capabilities (skills + capacity) consistently using one of those comparable tools would help. Ohh, so philosophical!
Rgds
G2
g2.com › compare › maxqda-vs-nvivo
Compare MAXQDA vs. NVivo | G2
Reviewers say that MAXQDA's "Collaboration / Workflow" features score 7.9, indicating a smoother experience for team projects, whereas NVivo's score of 7.1 suggests room for improvement in collaborative functionalities.
Address 100 S Wacker DrSTE 600, 60606, Chicago
Reddit
reddit.com › r/gradschool › preferred qualitative analysis software
r/GradSchool on Reddit: Preferred qualitative analysis software
June 28, 2025 -
Hi folks!
What are your recommendations for qualitative analysis software? I’ve heard good things about Nvivo and MAXQDA. If there is an open source version, that would be ideal, but I’m open to suggestions!
Top answer 1 of 4
33
Im Doing QA for the first time. Im using Nvivo and it's kind of ass if you need to manage a lot of codes. I can see it being good for smaller datasets though. Its like mildly more useful than just doing coding by hand imo. I'm stuck using it for now but im disappointed that ut doesn't have some features I'd expect to be essential (like a simple hover to see the code!). Be sure to set up the back ups. Also it crashes with some queries.
2 of 4
22
I use nvivo but it’s mid.
George Mason University
infoguides.gmu.edu › qual › software › choose
Choosing - QUALitative Research & Tools - InfoGuides at George Mason University
MAXQDA - Although newer than others, MAXQDA takes advantage of this with many colors, emoji's, and on-the-fly filtering. The interface tends to be more cluttered and redundant, but an identical interface across platforms, regular improvements, ...
Insight7
insight7.io › home › nvivo vs maxqda: which suits insight teams better?
NVivo vs MAXQDA: Which Suits Insight Teams Better? - Insight7 - Call Analytics & AI Coaching for Customer Teams
April 7, 2025 - NVivo excels in project management, allowing users to easily upload and organize data from multiple sources, including call transcripts and external documents. In contrast, MAXQDA focuses on intuitive data visualization, presenting findings ...
SaaSHub
saashub.com › home › data visualization › market research
NVivo VS MAXQDA - compare differences & reviews?
Limited Quantitative Analysis Tools While strong in qualitative and mixed methods analysis, MAXQDA offers limited tools for deep quantitative statistical analysis compared to specialized quantitative tools. Platform Limitations Some users have experienced reduced functionality on macOS compared ...
SourceForge
sourceforge.net › software › compare › MAXQDA-vs-NVivo
MAXQDA vs. NVivo Comparison
Compare MAXQDA vs. NVivo using this comparison chart. Compare price, features, and reviews of the software side-by-side to make the best choice for your business.
Software Suggest
softwaresuggest.com › home › data analysis tools › nvivo vs maxqda
Compare NVivo vs MAXQDA in October 2025 | SoftwareSuggest
August 14, 2025 - Compare NVivo and MAXQDA side-by-side based on pricing, features, user satisfaction, and based on reviews from real users.
Top answer 1 of 4
1
Almost all the major qualitative software programs (including ATLAS.ti as well) are about the same in terms of user friendliness. What probably makes the biggest difference is their documentation and online support (videos etc.).
In your case I would look at the websites for each and see if they have some resources that are devoted to your specific needs.
2 of 4
1
MAXQDA are much easier to learn to use than NVIVO is (although I have not used the most recent version of NVIVO).
MAXQDA is easy to retrieve and code data (option to code with colour-coded text, or even emojis). The thing I really like is the 'creative coding' option which allows me to visually arrange and rearrange my codes into data trees which can help in theory building.
Regards,
Usercall
usercall.co › post › maxqda-vs-nvivo-vs-usercall-which-qualitative-analysis-tool-is-best
MAXQDA vs NVivo vs Usercall: Which Qualitative Analysis Tool is Best?
Choose MAXQDA if your research is mixed-methods heavy and you value rich visualizations. Choose NVivo if you’re in a PhD or academic environment where it’s the institutional standard and you need its advanced queries.
Quora
quora.com › What-are-the-pros-and-cons-of-using-software-like-NVivo-MAXQDA-ATLAS-etc-in-qualitative-research
What are the pros and cons of using software like NVivo, MAXQDA, ATLAS, etc. in qualitative research? - Quora
Answer (1 of 2): I am interpreting this question as pros and cons of using any type of software vs not using it. I’ve done qualitative analysis using Nvivo and excel spreadsheets. I know some researchers that actually use Word. The coding process is similar, you are not gaining much in this ...
ATLAS.ti
atlasti.com › research-hub › atlas-ti-alternative-to-other-programs
ATLAS.ti - Alternative to NVivo, MAXQDA, etc. | Comparison - ATLAS.ti
It is also easy to code video data directly. As you code, quotations are automatically created. In MAXQDA and other QDA programs, the logic of working with video data is mainly based on preparing a transcript.
Top answer 1 of 2
2
MXQDA because it costs much less than NVivo and has more options.
To be fair, one can carry out qualitative data analysis without a software if one is aware of certain approaches like the Rigorous and Accelerated Data Reduction (RADaR) technique. I have used this approach in my recent publication in a journal by SAGE.
Working with adults with intellectual challenges to enhance ...
2 of 2
1
These two programs do the same thing with regard to basics such as coding and retrieval. They do differ with regard to advanced feature, for example MAXQDA currently has an interesting implementation of ChatGPT artificial intelligence.
MERIT
merit.education.wisc.edu › qualitative-software-support › choosing-a-qda-package
Choosing a QDA Package - MERIT
November 18, 2024 - When it comes to the cost of the software licenses, the time needed to learn the software, getting help when you run into trouble, and how well they handle the specific types of data and methods you use there can be significant differences. This guide will compare and contrast four popular programs; NVivo, MaxQDA, Atlas.ti, and Dedoose.
Reddit
reddit.com › r/sociology › nvivo or dedoose?
r/sociology on Reddit: NVivo or Dedoose?
March 5, 2025 -
I just passed my dissertation proposal defense and my committee recommended I use one of these two qualitative data analysis software. What are the pros and cons of each?
If the scope of my project affects your answer, my data will include: 25 interviews of 1-2 hours each and content analysis of roughly 1000 pages of court documents. I will not be coding by keywords, but rather doing line-by-line coding using a thematic approach.
I am unlikely to need to collaborate much given it is an individual project.
Top answer 1 of 10
6
Congrats on passing the proposal! I agree with much of what has been said. I would only ever recommend Dedoose for collaborative projects. NVivo is better for individual projects. Like Methods-Geek, I have also switched to MAXQDA. The reason for that is that it is far superior to all the other programs for integrating both qualitative and quantitative logics of analysis. For instance, qualitative codes can be easily converted into quantitative document variables in MAXQDA, but it was almost impossible to do when I was using NVivo. Granted, that was a decade ago, but I have not regretted the switch.
2 of 10
4
I have used Atlas.ti and NVivo. I prefer Atlas.ti to be honest but NVivo is fine. I think it has a free trial version so you could explore before you commit. NVivo is shit for collaboration so luckily that's not an issue for you. There's also a pretty steep learning curve. You might try checking out some YouTube tutorials for each program and seeing which one feels more approachable.