award
Factsheet
10 December 2009
(ceremony)
10 December 2009
(ceremony)
First of all, I would like to note that the "nominations for the award had been due by 1 February 2009, only 12 days after Obama took office." 1 Twelve days? Seems very early on to make a judgement on whether someone is deserving of the foremost recognition for peace in the world.
On top of this, even when the award was given to Mr. Obama, he was a mere nine months into his presidency. By this time he had hardly accomplished anything of political significance. I am not arguing that he was not attempting to make progress in certain areas, or that the progress he did make was too slow, but I am arguing that 9 months into a presidency is almost universally too short a time to judge whether or not someone is deserving of a Nobel Peace Prize.
Even the Nobel committee's official reason for awarding Obama the prize was flimsy: "extraordinary efforts to strengthen international diplomacy and cooperation between peoples." [Emphasis mine] Because he is trying to do something, this makes him a good recipient for the prize?
If a NCAA athlete made extraordinary efforts to be a great football player but in reality had accomplished very little, wouldn't it seem a bit ludicrous to award him the Heisman trophy?
I am more or less indifferent to Obama as a president. I do not love him and I do not hate him. I am very open to have my view changed, I just think he was awarded the NPP prematurely/without justification.