Hi. I'm having this issue too with Ryzen 5700x. I get 4,750mhz on OCCT but 4,600mhz on Cinebench. None of the limits I have set are being reached so it's definitely not a throttling issue. Answer from MaKTaiL on reddit.com
๐ŸŒ
Tom's Hardware Forum
forums.tomshardware.com โ€บ home โ€บ cooling
[SOLVED] - Stress test program - which one is the best? | Tom's Hardware Forum
July 1, 2020 - I don't use either HWMonitor, nor OCCT, so I couldn't tell ya. Cinebench - you don't mention which version you're using - is a constantly fluctuating workload; that kind of load is best for testing voltage stability.
๐ŸŒ
Overclockers
overclockers.com โ€บ home โ€บ forums โ€บ hardware โ€บ cpus โ€บ intel cpus
Stress test : what is "enough"? | Overclockers Forums
June 3, 2020 - Passing Cinebench R20 is good for demonstrating stability in a tentative way. It has the advantage of being a short, quick test that can help you get to an approximate max overclock without spending a lot of time. Once you find get to the point where you think you believe you have attained the max overclock on reasonable voltage, then I would run Realbench or OCCT ...
๐ŸŒ
Reddit
reddit.com โ€บ r/overclocking โ€บ clockspeeds lower in cinebench r23 than occt?
r/overclocking on Reddit: Clockspeeds lower in Cinebench R23 than OCCT?
March 23, 2023 -

Been fiddling around with PBO2 on my new 7900x and I noticed that my clock speeds on Cinebench are oddly lower than what I get from OCCT. At -30 offset and 110w power limit, I hit roughly 4.85 GHZ but in OCCT with AVX2 with large data set and extreme mode. Thing is my scores are scaling properly with them getting higher from what I've tested but I was just curious as to why this is the case.

๐ŸŒ
H|ard|Forum
hardforum.com โ€บ [h]ard|ware โ€บ overclocking & cooling
Stability and overclocking - what do you consider stable | [H]ard|Forum
December 31, 2019 - This blender load generally sits at 72-74c after heavy pre-loading. Cinebench is a bit higher at about 2 degree's higher. This is after looping it for about 20 minutes (this was for temperature, not for stability).
๐ŸŒ
Overclock.net
overclock.net โ€บ home โ€บ forums โ€บ intel โ€บ intel cpus
Is CinebenchR23 overly sensitive ? | Overclock.net
November 14, 2023 - Cinebench is decent to test max power consumption and stability for most games, but its more of a benchmark than a stability test. ... Pass R15 for 20 loops in a row without waiting (no WHEA errors logged in HWinfo64, or crashes) and you're ...
๐ŸŒ
MMO-Champion
mmo-champion.com โ€บ forum โ€บ off-topic forums โ€บ computer
What's considered a stable overclock?
AMD CPUs usually go straight into the power limit before it gets hot enough with Prime95 - its useless with AMD for testing, so you need to use AIDA or similar tools that generate enough heat with memory/cache ussage. Cinebench R20 is bad for stability testing, because you have no transients.
Find elsewhere
๐ŸŒ
Reddit
reddit.com โ€บ r/amd โ€บ new occt benchmark and it's awesome
r/Amd on Reddit: New OCCT benchmark and it's AWESOME
June 18, 2021 - Differend loads on the CPU. Also, while running Cinebench you also run smth like HWinfo to check the frequency, and just by having it run it interferes in your frequency reading and score. OCCT does that too, but way less.
๐ŸŒ
Overclockers UK
forums.overclockers.co.uk โ€บ hardware โ€บ cpus
New CPU benchmark from OCCT | Overclockers UK Forums
June 18, 2021 - As a CPU benchmark this means it's useless it has the same problems as geekbench the reason why Cinebench is so well respected and used is because the results are comparable to another cpu regardless of their memory because ram type and speed doesn't affect the score
๐ŸŒ
XbitLabs
xbitlabs.com โ€บ home โ€บ blog โ€บ advanced cpu/ram overclock stability testing
Advanced CPU/RAM Overclock Stability Testing | XbitLabs
July 26, 2025 - You can also use OCCT AVX2 โ€“ Large โ€“ Normal/Prime 95 Big FFTs to test for CPU IMC instability which is more useful for RAM but can be used for CPU OC testing as well. Cinebench should not be used as a stability benchmark, instead, you can just use it to see if your performance is increasing with the overclock and if it starts regressing with faulty settings.
๐ŸŒ
Linus Tech Tips
linustechtips.com โ€บ computer hardware โ€บ cpus, motherboards, and memory
CPU OC Stress Test for Gaming Loads - CPUs, Motherboards, and Memory - Linus Tech Tips
February 1, 2023 - Do you guys use any particular stress tests to find stable Overclocks just for gaming loads? (besides just playing a game and wait for it to crash). I've always used Cinebench R23 (60min loop) to stress test my CPU Overclocks, using this always resulted in full stability for gaming loads. As most...
๐ŸŒ
AlternativeTo
alternativeto.net โ€บ software โ€บ occt
OCCT Alternatives: Top 12 Benchmark Tools | AlternativeTo
There are more than 25 alternatives to OCCT for a variety of platforms, including Windows, Linux, Mac, Android and iPhone apps. The best OCCT alternative is AIDA64. It's not free, so if you're looking for a free alternative, you could try Geekbench or Furmark. Other great apps like OCCT are Cinebench, UNIGINE Benchmarks, 3DMark and UserBenchMark.
๐ŸŒ
Overclock.net
overclock.net โ€บ home โ€บ forums โ€บ benchmarks โ€บ benchmarking software and discussion
What are some stability tests to ensure that your newly built PC is running fine? | Overclock.net
March 1, 2021 - OCCT large data set AVX2 for stability testing. Small data SSE for thermal / VRM testing. Seems to be pretty reliable for most use cases. If my system is stable in those 2 tests, it's stable in any other real world stress test (so P95 small FFT AVX and linpack xtreme not included).
๐ŸŒ
Linus Tech Tips
linustechtips.com โ€บ computer hardware โ€บ cpus, motherboards, and memory
Huge difference between stress tests - CPUs, Motherboards, and Memory - Linus Tech Tips
February 21, 2022 - Hi, Im in the process of finding the sweet spot in overclocking my I5 6600K. The problem is that I get very different results from different stress test software. I've used: Prime95 small FFT Prime95 Blend OCCT Small, Extreme, AVX2 OCCT Large, Normal, SSE AIDA64Extreme FPU AIDA64Extreme CPU, FPU,...
๐ŸŒ
OCBASE
ocbase.com
OCBASE/OCCT : Free, all-in-one stability, stress test, benchmark and monitoring tool for your PC
With a wide range of 3D tests, OCCT recreates gaming conditions, extreme scenarios, and light usage, offering insights into performance across different usage patterns, picking up any artefact or errors during execution.
๐ŸŒ
Linus Tech Tips
linustechtips.com โ€บ software โ€บ programs, apps and websites
Which Stress Testing Software - Programs, Apps and Websites - Linus Tech Tips
July 18, 2020 - What software do you use to stress test your systems? I've run the timespy benchmark to quickly check CPU temps and they never got above 66C, the GPU average temp was 61C. It's not a long test so I ran the timespy stress test and CPU temps never got over 43C with GPU average 77C. Should I be usin...
๐ŸŒ
Reddit
reddit.com โ€บ r/overclocking โ€บ understanding occt
r/overclocking on Reddit: Understanding OCCT
May 9, 2024 -

Can someone please explain why am I crashing on the CPU test with small dataset with all cores no matter the LLC and voltage?

Started to manually tune my r7 5700x, getting to 4.8GHz, no BSODs, games running, cinebench results (R23) satisfying at around 16500, so once I started decreasing voltage I'm now down to 1.3v drooping to 1.275-1.28v (LLC lv3) and it's passing everything except all core small dataset stress test.. Currently cycling cores with small dataset for 10 mins now, no errors so far. LLC LV2 with 1.325 set voltage gave 1.269 in cinebench but it crashed, 1.3 with llc 3 gives 1.275 and its not crashing.

So am I supposed to make it droop more? Or is it okay to just use small data set for single core and cycle them and use all core for medium/large dataset test?

Set parameters are small/extreme/variable/AVX2.

Motherboard I'm using is ASUS X470 prime pro, cooling the CPU with NH D15

I assume it shutdowns on account of thermals, since I can start the test with 8 threads fixed but once it reports close to 95ยฐ it just shuts down.

Is that a realistic workload, if thermals are the only problem and I KNOW I will never hammer the CPU with such a workload in real life, is it fine to ignore that test, or just to test up to a certain amount of cores?