ox
/ŏks/
noun
  1. (Zoöl.) The male of bovine quadrupeds, especially the domestic animal when castrated and grown to its full size, or nearly so. The word is also applied, as a general name, to any species of bovine animals, male and female.
  2. (Zoöl.) the yak.
  3. (Zoöl.) the zebu.
from the GNU version of the Collaborative International Dictionary of English. More at Wordnik

Old English oxan, plural of oxa, was very common, appearing in the psalter, the bible, and laws, among other places, although the spelling oxen is attested in only one place, in a document relating to Bury St Edmund's possessions, rents, and grants.

The genitive plural form of oxa, often with a syncopated vowel, was ox(e)na. That genitive form is attested in place names (cf. oxenaford, Middle English Oxenford, ModE Oxford, oxeneham ModE Oxnam, oxenesetene ModE Oxsettle Bottom, oxnaleage ModE Oxleigh and Oxley , a woodland clearing or a natural glade, meadow, lea, a plant name oxna-lib glossing Latin oleotropius ModE oxlip, ox-heal), as a unit of measure of land (oxnagang, ModE ox-gang, one-eighth of a "hide"), and in genitive (oxna-paeþ ModE oxens' path) and partitive genitive constructions (ic bohte fif getymu oxena, ic bohte an getyme oxena, ModE I bought five teams of oxen, I bought one team of oxen) and those uses appear not only in texts dealing with quotidien farming and mercantile situations but notably in passages from the Bible, which would frequently have been heard by audiences from all social and economic classes.

The plural appears as oxen and is very well-attested in Middle English in a wide range of texts. It appears in various spellings, including oksen, exen, oxon, oxen, oxsen, oxsin, ocsen (see the MED). Its appearance in proverbial contexts (Moche uolk of religion zetteþ þe zuolȝ be-uore the oksen. Many people of religion set the plow before the oxen) and laws is very strong evidence that it was widely used.

P.S. I have a copy of the Old English corpus and found these attestations by searching it. (I studied Old English and Middle English as an undergraduate and graduate student, back before the days of personal computers, but they haven't changed much in the interim.)

P.P.S. I stumbled upon a book, Working Oxen by Martin Watts. 1999. "... a survey of their use in Britain, their impact upon the countryside, and the relics that can still be found: yokes, bows, shoes, housing and place-names. Martin Watts is curator of the Ryedale Folk Museum in North Yorkshire." [Google Books description] and "Oxen were one of the most important sources of motive power in the British countryside... The working ox has left a lasting mark on the language, landscape and culture... Historians rarely mention or study them. It is as if a history of twentieth century were to ignore the impact of the tractor and the lorry. The purpose of this book is to redress that balance." [from the blurb on Amazon].

Answer from TimR on Stack Exchange
🌐
Dictionary.com
dictionary.com › browse › ox
OX- Definition & Meaning | Dictionary.com
Plural word for ox The plural form of ox is oxen. This is one of the few remaining irregular nouns whose plural derives directly from its original pluralization in Old English. A similar change is made when pluralizing woman (women), man (men), and child (children).
🌐
Vocabulary.com
vocabulary.com › articles › wc › why-do-we-say-oxen-and-not-oxes
Why Do We Say "Oxen" And Not "Oxes"? : Word Count | Vocabulary.com
In her latest installment, she explains why the plural of the word ox is oxen instead of oxes. Why do a few words take -en instead of -s or -es to become plural? You may have heard that English is a Germanic language. The -en ending on plurals is something we get from our German roots. In Old English, some nouns were made plural with -s and -es as they are today, but many nouns took -en to become plural. The s-form plurals became dominant in northern England first, while the en-form hung on in southern England.
People also ask

What Is the Plural of Ox?
The standard plural form of "ox" is "oxen." This irregular plural formation differs from the typical English pattern of adding "-s" or "-es" to form plurals. When referring to multiple ox animals, the correct term is "oxen," not "oxes." Examples: One ox is pulling the cart. Three oxen are grazing in the field. The farmer owns five oxen. This irregular plural formation represents one of English's linguistic fossils—preserving an ancient Germanic plural pattern that has largely disappeared from modern usage.
🌐
kylian.ai
kylian.ai › blog › en › plural-of-ox
What’s the Plural of Ox? Irregular Forms Explained
Why Is "Oxen" the Plural of "Ox"?
The "-en" plural ending in "oxen" originates from Old English, where many nouns formed their plurals using this suffix. This grammatical pattern stems from Proto-Germanic languages, specifically the weak noun declension system. In Old English (approximately 450-1100 CE), many nouns followed this pattern: oxa (singular) → oxan (plural) As English evolved through Middle English into Modern English, most irregular plural forms disappeared through a process called regularization. Most nouns that once used the "-en" suffix eventually adopted the standard "-s" plural pattern. However, "oxen" persist
🌐
kylian.ai
kylian.ai › blog › en › plural-of-ox
What’s the Plural of Ox? Irregular Forms Explained
🌐
Grammar Monster
grammar-monster.com › plurals › plural_of_ox.htm
The Plural of Ox
What is the plural of ox? The plural of ox is oxen. Confusion arises because 'oxen' derives from German, and native English speakers are drawn to 'oxes,' which adheres to the standard ruling for forming plurals.
Top answer
1 of 3
20

Old English oxan, plural of oxa, was very common, appearing in the psalter, the bible, and laws, among other places, although the spelling oxen is attested in only one place, in a document relating to Bury St Edmund's possessions, rents, and grants.

The genitive plural form of oxa, often with a syncopated vowel, was ox(e)na. That genitive form is attested in place names (cf. oxenaford, Middle English Oxenford, ModE Oxford, oxeneham ModE Oxnam, oxenesetene ModE Oxsettle Bottom, oxnaleage ModE Oxleigh and Oxley , a woodland clearing or a natural glade, meadow, lea, a plant name oxna-lib glossing Latin oleotropius ModE oxlip, ox-heal), as a unit of measure of land (oxnagang, ModE ox-gang, one-eighth of a "hide"), and in genitive (oxna-paeþ ModE oxens' path) and partitive genitive constructions (ic bohte fif getymu oxena, ic bohte an getyme oxena, ModE I bought five teams of oxen, I bought one team of oxen) and those uses appear not only in texts dealing with quotidien farming and mercantile situations but notably in passages from the Bible, which would frequently have been heard by audiences from all social and economic classes.

The plural appears as oxen and is very well-attested in Middle English in a wide range of texts. It appears in various spellings, including oksen, exen, oxon, oxen, oxsen, oxsin, ocsen (see the MED). Its appearance in proverbial contexts (Moche uolk of religion zetteþ þe zuolȝ be-uore the oksen. Many people of religion set the plow before the oxen) and laws is very strong evidence that it was widely used.

P.S. I have a copy of the Old English corpus and found these attestations by searching it. (I studied Old English and Middle English as an undergraduate and graduate student, back before the days of personal computers, but they haven't changed much in the interim.)

P.P.S. I stumbled upon a book, Working Oxen by Martin Watts. 1999. "... a survey of their use in Britain, their impact upon the countryside, and the relics that can still be found: yokes, bows, shoes, housing and place-names. Martin Watts is curator of the Ryedale Folk Museum in North Yorkshire." [Google Books description] and "Oxen were one of the most important sources of motive power in the British countryside... The working ox has left a lasting mark on the language, landscape and culture... Historians rarely mention or study them. It is as if a history of twentieth century were to ignore the impact of the tractor and the lorry. The purpose of this book is to redress that balance." [from the blurb on Amazon].

2 of 3
16

I don't know of any satisfying reason for it.

Note that when the OED says "Old English– oxen (rare)", it means that the specific spelling O-X-E-N was rare in Old English. It doesn't say that oxan was rare, and from the point of view of later development, the difference between Old English oxan and oxen is irrelevant: it was normal for Old English "a" in unstressed syllables to be weakened to schwa, which in Middle English came to be spelled "e". Compare the development of the Old English infinitive ending -an to -e in the case of words like drīfan > drive.

There is a general principle that irregular forms persist longer in frequently used words, but I'm not sure how much it can do to explain the use of the form oxen. I don't think we talk about oxen as much as we used to.

It seems conceivable that the fact that the singular already ends in an /s/ sound made it a bit harder for the sibilant plural to become established, but I'm not really sure if that played an important role: obviously there are multiple other words ending in -x that do form their plurals in -xes, such as foxes, boxes, axes.

🌐
Wiktionary
en.wiktionary.org › wiki › ox
ox - Wiktionary, the free dictionary
[edit] IPA(key): /ɔks/ IPA(key): /ɔʊ̯s/ (possibly) [edit] ox (plural oxin or owsyn) ox (castrated bull) [edit] Scots: ouse (either from Middle Scots *owse or rebuilt on the plural owsyn) [edit] “ox”, in The Dictionary of the Scots Language, ...
🌐
Reddit
reddit.com › r/linguistics › how did oxen become the only old english -an plural to survive?
r/linguistics on Reddit: How did oxen become the only Old English -an plural to survive?
July 9, 2015 - Regarding the last form, although many common enough words were given an -an ending for the plural, e.g. guman ‘men’, froggan ‘frogs’, naman ‘names’, tungan ‘tongues’, only one of these has survived, i.e. Old English oxa oxan, though Middle English created a few new n-plurals by adding the -n to nouns like childre, the plural of child ‘child’ to give modern children.
Find elsewhere
🌐
Kylian
kylian.ai › blog › en › plural-of-ox
What’s the Plural of Ox? Irregular Forms Explained
May 13, 2025 - This preservation of an archaic form provides valuable insight into how certain words can resist broader linguistic change patterns. While "oxen" stands as the most prominent example of the "-en" plural suffix in modern English, a few other words retain this pattern, though some have become increasingly archaic:
Top answer
1 of 3
17

The word ox comes from the Old English oxa. In Old English, as in Indo-European languages in general (historically and even today), the number of a noun (singular or plural) and its function in a sentence—whether it was the subject, direct object, indirect object, or had some other relation to a verb or another noun—was largely (not solely) governed by sets of endings tacked onto it, or changes made to the vowels in it. These sets of endings or changes were called declensions, and each type of relationship associated with an ending is called a case.

There were a number of declensions in Old English; the two most prominent were the weak declension, containing the weak nouns, and the strong declension, containing the strong nouns. Old English oxa was a weak noun. The forms that we have of its descendant today are derived from the nominative case endings; these are the forms that would indicate that a noun is the subject of a sentence, or the forms that would be used when writing a list of nouns.

Since oxa was a weak noun, its plural form (the nominative plural form) was oxan. Over the course of centuries, the a "weakened" to an e, giving us oxen.

Fox, on the other hand, comes from the Old English fox, which was a strong noun; its Old English plural was foxas, whence we get foxes.

The source I used to confirm the declension of fox has an entry for the Old English box; however, it has no declension information. Using this translator, however, it appears that the nominative plural was boxas, giving us boxes.

Although Modern English has largely dropped the declensional suffixes we got from Old English, we occasionally see them peeking through, as we do here.

2 of 3
1

My guess is that it has to do with word origin. The proto-Germanic word for oxen was ukhson so the ending didn't move too much. Meanwhile "fox" comes from "fukhs" which followed words like "box" to the es ending.

🌐
The Word Counter
thewordcounter.com › home › blog › the plural of ox: here’s what it is and how to use it
What is the Plural of Ox? | The Word Counter
October 27, 2020 - The correct plural of ox is oxen. The word ox comes from Old English oxa and so the plural form follows the rules from Old English words.
Price   $$
Address   4572 Vía Marina Unit 102, 90292, Marina Del Rey, CA
🌐
Grammar Palette
grammarpalette.com › home › plural nouns › what are the plurals of ‘ox’ and ‘fox’? why ‘oxen’ and ‘foxes’?
What Are the Plurals of 'Ox' and 'Fox'? Why 'Oxen' and 'Foxes'? | Grammar Palette
February 16, 2024 - “Oxen” takes a different route, keeping a piece of old English history alive, while “foxes” keeps it simple with the usual “es.” So, whether you’re in the world of big, strong oxen or clever, cunning foxes, you’ve got the words to talk about them in the plural form.
🌐
Merriam-Webster
merriam-webster.com › dictionary › ox
OX Definition & Meaning - Merriam-Webster
combining form · Example Sentences · Word History · Phrases Containing · Rhymes · Entries Near · Related Articles · Cite this EntryCitation · Share · Kids DefinitionKids · More from M-W Show more · Show more · Citation · Share · Kids · More from M-W · Save Word · To save this word, you'll need to log in. Log In · 1 of 2 · ˈäks · plural oxen ˈäk-sən also ox ·
🌐
Blogger
lingwe.blogspot.com › 2009 › 02 › oxen-and-foxes-curious-life-and-death.html
Lingwë - Musings of a Fish: Oxen and Foxes — the curious life and death of plurals - The blog of Tolkien scholar and philologist Jason Fisher
But in Modern English (as in Modern Dutch os) the terminal vowel has been lost. But fox had its terminal consonant from the beginning. OE fox is a strong noun, hence its plural form is foxas; but OE oxa is a weak noun, hence its plural would be … anyone? … oxan.
🌐
TikTok
tiktok.com › sl rockfish (@englishmakesnosense) | tiktok › plurals with the letter x.#plurals#box#ox#fox#x#esl#learnontiktok
Plurals with the letter X.#plurals#box#ox#fox#x#esl#learnontiktok | TikTok
3288 Likes, 111 Comments. TikTok video from SL Rockfish (@englishmakesnosense): “Plurals with the letter X.#plurals#box#ox#fox#x#esl#learnontiktok”. Plurals of words that end is “X”.original sound - SL Rockfish.
🌐
University of Pennsylvania Department of Linguistics
ling.upenn.edu › ~beatrice › humor › english-lesson.html
Linguistic humor
We'll begin with box, and the plural is boxes; But the plural of ox should be oxen, not oxes.
🌐
Vedantu
vedantu.com › question-answer › oxen-plural-singular-plural-possessive-or-class-10-english-cbse-608a1f5ff4e14b3491a73560
What is oxen? Plural, singular, plural possessive, or singular possessive?
September 27, 2025 - When a plural noun ends in ‘s’, ... you have to do is add an 's’ if a person, location, or thing owns something. In the above question, Oxen is the plural form of an ox....
🌐
Quora
quora.com › Whats-the-plural-of-the-word-ox
What's the plural of the word ox? - Quora
Answer (1 of 53): > What's the plural of the word Ox? The plural comes from Old English: “oxen.”