JavaScript provides two methods for converting non-number primitives into numbers: parseInt() and parseFloat() . As you may have guessed, the former converts a value into an integer whereas the latter converts a value into a floating-point number.
Any number literal contained in a string is also converted correctly, so the string "0xA" is properly converted into the number 10. However, the string "22.5" will be converted to 22 , because the decimal point is an invalid character for an integer. Some examples:
var iNum1 = parseInt("1234blue"); //returns 1234
var iNum2 = parseInt("0xA"); //returns 10
var iNum3 = parseInt("22.5"); //returns 22
var iNum4 = parseInt("blue"); //returns NaN
The parseInt() method also has a radix mode, allowing you to convert strings in binary, octal, hexadecimal, or any other base into an integer. The radix is specified as a second argument to parseInt() , so a call to parse a hexadecimal value looks like this:
var iNum1 = parseInt("AF", 16); //returns 175
Of course, this can also be done for binary, octal, and even decimal (which is the default mode):
var iNum1 = parseInt("10", 2); //returns 2
var iNum2 = parseInt("10", 8); //returns 8
var iNum2 = parseInt("10", 10); //returns 10
If decimal numbers contain a leading zero, itโs always best to specify the radix as 10 so that you wonโt accidentally end up with an octal value. For example:
var iNum1 = parseInt("010"); //returns 8
var iNum2 = parseInt("010", 8); //returns 8
var iNum3 = parseInt("010", 10); //returns 10
In this code, both lines are parsing the string "010" into a number. The first line thinks that the string is an octal value and parses it the same way as the second line (which specifies the radix as 8). The last line specifies a radix of 10, so iNum3 ends up equal to 10.
Another difference when using parseFloat() is that the string must represent a floating-point number in decimal form, not octal or hexadecimal. This method ignores leading zeros, so the octal number 0908 will be parsed into 908 , and the hexadecimal number 0xA will return NaN because x isnโt a valid character for a floating-point number. There is also no radix mode for parseFloat() .
Some examples of using parseFloat() :
var fNum1 = parseFloat("1234blue"); //returns 1234
var fNum2 = parseFloat("0xA"); //returns 0
var fNum3 = parseFloat("22.5"); //returns 22.5
var fNum4 = parseFloat("22.34.5"); //returns 22.34
var fNum5 = parseFloat("0908"); //returns 908
var fNum6 = parseFloat("blue"); //returns NaN
Read More, Read More
Similar Question Read more here
Answer from Techie on Stack OverflowI'm a Jr dev (that says it all, right?).
I was working on a bug that I successfully fixed, but lead me to wonder this relationship between floats (maybe also ints) and strings.
I've made this code sandbox where there is a number displayed and two possible ways of changing it- typing or clicking buttons. If you type you'll see that it's a string, but if you use buttons it will be a number. Sometimes after typing in the TextField the buttons will edit the string and the up button will just add a 1 digit to the end of the number. I recorded the behavior here. You can see that the up button just adds a 1 to the end of the number, but down actually decreases the value of the number by 1.
Why is this happening? Could it be due to the use of Material-UI?
The advantage of using Number() instead of parseInt or parseFloat
Behavior difference between parseInt() and parseFloat()
What is the difference between Number(...) and parseFloat(...)
Difference parseInt() and parseFloat()
JavaScript provides two methods for converting non-number primitives into numbers: parseInt() and parseFloat() . As you may have guessed, the former converts a value into an integer whereas the latter converts a value into a floating-point number.
Any number literal contained in a string is also converted correctly, so the string "0xA" is properly converted into the number 10. However, the string "22.5" will be converted to 22 , because the decimal point is an invalid character for an integer. Some examples:
var iNum1 = parseInt("1234blue"); //returns 1234
var iNum2 = parseInt("0xA"); //returns 10
var iNum3 = parseInt("22.5"); //returns 22
var iNum4 = parseInt("blue"); //returns NaN
The parseInt() method also has a radix mode, allowing you to convert strings in binary, octal, hexadecimal, or any other base into an integer. The radix is specified as a second argument to parseInt() , so a call to parse a hexadecimal value looks like this:
var iNum1 = parseInt("AF", 16); //returns 175
Of course, this can also be done for binary, octal, and even decimal (which is the default mode):
var iNum1 = parseInt("10", 2); //returns 2
var iNum2 = parseInt("10", 8); //returns 8
var iNum2 = parseInt("10", 10); //returns 10
If decimal numbers contain a leading zero, itโs always best to specify the radix as 10 so that you wonโt accidentally end up with an octal value. For example:
var iNum1 = parseInt("010"); //returns 8
var iNum2 = parseInt("010", 8); //returns 8
var iNum3 = parseInt("010", 10); //returns 10
In this code, both lines are parsing the string "010" into a number. The first line thinks that the string is an octal value and parses it the same way as the second line (which specifies the radix as 8). The last line specifies a radix of 10, so iNum3 ends up equal to 10.
Another difference when using parseFloat() is that the string must represent a floating-point number in decimal form, not octal or hexadecimal. This method ignores leading zeros, so the octal number 0908 will be parsed into 908 , and the hexadecimal number 0xA will return NaN because x isnโt a valid character for a floating-point number. There is also no radix mode for parseFloat() .
Some examples of using parseFloat() :
var fNum1 = parseFloat("1234blue"); //returns 1234
var fNum2 = parseFloat("0xA"); //returns 0
var fNum3 = parseFloat("22.5"); //returns 22.5
var fNum4 = parseFloat("22.34.5"); //returns 22.34
var fNum5 = parseFloat("0908"); //returns 908
var fNum6 = parseFloat("blue"); //returns NaN
Read More, Read More
Similar Question Read more here
First of all only parseInt accepts second argument. It's called radix. It represents numeral system to be used. In example you can convert number into binary or hexadecimal code.
parseFloat only accepts one argument.
parseInt() assumes the base of your number according to the first characters in the string. If it begins with 0x it assumes base 16 (hexadecimal). Otherwise, if it begins with 0 it assumes base 8 (octal). Otherwise it assumes base 10.
You can specify the base as a second argument:
alert(parseInt(hfrom[0], 10)); // 8
From MDN (linked above):
If radix is undefined or 0, JavaScript assumes the following:
If the input string begins with "0x" or "0X", radix is 16 (hexadecimal). If the input string begins with "0", radix is eight (octal). This feature is non-standard, and some implementations deliberately do not support it (instead using the radix 10). For this reason always specify a radix when using parseInt. If the input string begins with any other value, the radix is 10 (decimal).
you should always include the radix param with parseInt() ex parseInt('013', 10) otherwise it can convert it to a different numeric base:
parseInt('013') === 11
parseInt('013', 10) === 13
parseInt('0x13') === 19
The internal workings are not that different, as @James Allardic already answered. There is a difference though. Using parseFloat, a (trimmed) string starting with one or more numeric characters followed by alphanumeric characters can convert to a Number, with Number that will not succeed. As in:
parseFloat('3.23abc'); //=> 3.23
Number('3.23abc'); //=> NaN
In both conversions, the input string is trimmed, by the way:
parseFloat(' 3.23abc '); //=> 3.23
Number(' 3.23 '); //=> 3.23
No. Both will result in the internal ToNumber(string) function being called.
From ES5 section 15.7.1 (The Number Constructor Called as a Function):
When
Numberis called as a function rather than as a constructor, it performs a type conversion...Returns a Number value (not a Number object) computed by
ToNumber(value)if value was supplied, else returns+0.
From ES5 section 15.1.2.3 (parseFloat (string)):
... If neither
trimmedStringnor any prefix oftrimmedStringsatisfies the syntax of aStrDecimalLiteral(see 9.3.1) ...
And 9.3.1 is the section titled "ToNumber Applied to the String Type", which is what the first quote is referring to when it says ToNumber(value).
Update (see comments)
By calling the Number constructor with the new operator, you will get an instance of the Number object, rather than a numeric literal. For example:
typeof new Number(10); //object
typeof Number(10); //number
This is defined in section 15.7.2 (The Number Constructor):
When
Numberis called as part of anewexpression it is a constructor: it initialises the newly created object.