Opinions on Playwright MCP?
Has anyone used Playwright MCP yet? I'm wondering what are the pros and cons that people have seen.
Playwright MCP for beginners
Playwright - to mcp or not mcp
How can beginners transition to advanced Playwright MCP usage effectively?
The progression from beginner to expert in Playwright MCP typically comes from gradually layering more sophisticated capabilities onto basic scripts. A newcomer might start by writing simple navigation and interaction tests, then move into leveraging API mocking, test data generation, and multi-page workflows. Over time, incorporating advanced features like tracing, video recording, and parallel execution within CI/CD pipelines builds expertise while also embedding best practices such as Page Object Models and modular test architecture. This incremental approach ensures that the framework grows naturally with project needs instead of overwhelming the team upfront.
How does Playwright MCP fit into a modern enterprise automation strategy?
Playwright MCP aligns well with the push toward scalable, maintainable, and reliable automation. It integrates smoothly with BDD frameworks, cloud-based execution grids, and modern reporting tools, ensuring both developers and non-technical stakeholders can access meaningful test insights. Its ability to simulate real-world conditions, such as different network speeds and geolocations, also makes it invaluable for performance and localization testing. By combining these capabilities with robust CI/CD integration, Playwright MCP becomes not just a testing library but a central pillar in the organization’s quality engineering ecosystem.
What makes Playwright MCP different from traditional browser automation tools?
Playwright MCP introduces a modern approach to automation by supporting multiple browsers, devices, and contexts in a single unified API, which significantly reduces the complexity of cross-browser testing. Unlike older tools that often require separate configurations for Chrome, Firefox, and WebKit, Playwright MCP handles them seamlessly while offering built-in features such as network interception, advanced selectors, and auto-waiting mechanisms. This eliminates much of the flakiness seen in legacy frameworks and allows teams to focus more on test logic rather than environmental setup.
Videos
That. I've just had a meeting with the QA department in the company and the QA lead strongly encouraged (aka, is forcing) us to start using AI. The one they mentioned and one that drew my attention was Playwright MCP. They said it was wonderful and marvelous. I know they're doing this because their clients are asking the employees to start using it because it speeds processes up by a lot. I'm about to try it out but I don't know... I love creating test cases and automating them. I have a good time and that's the reason why Im into automation (half coding skills, half understanding the business). Not a fan of AI doing all my freaking job. I will still be doing automation test cases on my own in my repo. But have you tried it? What do you think of it?
PD: I've just tried. My opinion? Yeah it has potential as someone said here. I spent around an hour to get one single test running unsuccessfully. It's a tricky app, but quite close to a real scenario where things can get that way. I do see it can save a shit ton of time finding locators and setting the POM structure, not not much more. Actually, I showed it my code (which runs smoothly in every case) and it still couldn't get the test done correctly.
» npm install @playwright/mcp