Playwright is puppeteerv2. There is no reason to choose puppeteer over playwright in 2024 Answer from computerjunkie7410 on reddit.com
🌐
Medium
medium.com › front-end-weekly › playwright-vs-puppeteer-choosing-the-right-browser-automation-tool-in-2024-d46d2cbadf71
Playwright vs Puppeteer: Choosing the Right Browser Automation Tool in 2024 | by Shanika Wickramasinghe | Frontend Weekly | Medium
May 15, 2024 - Puppeteer also supports network interception, but it might require additional setup for more complex scenarios. Playwright supports detailed performance testing, which helps in optimizing web page performance.
🌐
Better Stack
betterstack.com › community › comparisons › playwright-vs-puppeteer
Playwright vs Puppeteer: The Definitive Comparison | Better Stack Community
Based on carefully conducted benchmarks ... for specific elements, Playwright demonstrated superior performance with an average execution time of 4.513 seconds compared to Puppeteer's 4.784 seconds....
🌐
Autify
autify.com › blog › playwright-vs-puppeteer
Playwright vs Puppeteer: What’s the Difference?
Playwright’s multi-context browsing ... different browsers and devices. Puppeteer, while less versatile in this regard, remains a reliable choice for Chromium-based performance testing....
🌐
Oxylabs
oxylabs.io › blog › playwright-vs-puppeteer
Playwright vs Puppeteer: The Differences
Playwright's architecture enables performance testing, including network throttling, CPU load simulation, and request interception, making it a strong choice for web page performance analysis.
🌐
Apify
blog.apify.com › playwright-vs-puppeteer
Playwright vs. Puppeteer: which is better?
March 18, 2025 - Two powerful Node.js libraries: described and compared.
🌐
Checkly
checklyhq.com › blog › puppeteer vs selenium vs playwright
Puppeteer vs Selenium vs Playwright, a speed comparison
November 22, 2024 - ... The first thing that catches one's attention is the large difference between the average execution time for Playwright and Puppeteer, with the latter being almost 30% faster and showing less variation in its performance.
🌐
BrowserStack
browserstack.com › home › guide › playwright vs puppeteer: which to choose in 2025?
Playwright vs Puppeteer: Which to choose in 2025? | BrowserStack
October 22, 2025 - Complex Handling of Dynamic UIs: While Puppeteer is strong with Chromium, handling frequently changing selectors or highly dynamic SPAs requires careful scripting and can increase maintenance. Smaller Advanced Testing Ecosystem: Compared to Playwright, fewer built-in features exist for cross-browser testing, multiple contexts, or parallel fixture management, which may require custom solutions.
🌐
ZenRows
zenrows.com › homepage › tutorial › playwright vs. puppeteer in 2025: which should you choose
Playwright vs. Puppeteer in 2025: Which Should You Choose - ZenRows
July 18, 2024 - Let’s insert Playwright and Puppeteer scraping code in the respective functions, tune to headless browsing and then run the performance.js file five times to get the average runtime.
Find elsewhere
🌐
Skyvern Blog
skyvern.com › blog › puppeteer-vs-playwright-complete-performance-comparison-2025
Puppeteer vs Playwright Performance: Speed Test Results
August 20, 2025 - Based on carefully conducted benchmarks ... is complex. Playwright showed superior performance with an average execution time of 4.513 seconds compared to Puppeteer's 4.784 seconds in navigation-heavy scenarios....
🌐
ScrapingAnt
scrapingant.com › blog › playwright-vs-puppeteer
Playwright vs. Puppeteer in 2024 - Which Should You Choose? | ScrapingAnt
August 30, 2024 - While Playwright offers comprehensive cross-browser support and advanced features for handling dynamic content, Puppeteer excels in Chrome-based environments with its optimized performance and efficient resource utilization.
🌐
AIMultiple
research.aimultiple.com › home › aimultiple research › data › web data scraping › scraping tools
Playwright vs Puppeteer: Scraping & Automation
Explore the key differences and ... browsers over the DevTools Protocol or WebDriver BiDi. Puppeteer allows automation testing of Chrome Extensions for performance ......
🌐
TestGrid
testgrid.io › test automation › playwright vs. puppeteer: choosing the right browser automation library
Playwright vs. Puppeteer: Choosing the Best Web Automation Library
October 22, 2024 - Since Puppeteer is designed by and for Chrome, it is the best option if you’re focusing on this browser, including headless Chrome and Chromium. Works faster than Playwright since it has fewer dependencies and is optimized primarily for Chromium.
🌐
Contentful
contentful.com › blog › puppeteer-vs-playwright
Puppeteer vs. Playwright: Automated testing tools compared | Contentful
March 12, 2025 - While Puppeteer · focuses on Chromium-based browsers and Firefox, making it highly optimized for those environments, that fact naturally limits its cross-browser testing capabilities. Playwright has a much broader compatibility, supporting the three major browser engines: Chromium, Firefox, and WebKit (the engine behind Safari).
🌐
RapidSeedbox
rapidseedbox.com › blog › puppeteer-or-playwright
Puppeteer vs Playwright: Which Tool Wins?
June 23, 2025 - Meanwhile, Playwright offers native proxy rotation, built-in network interception, and robust multi-context support—all great for complex or large-scale scraping projects. It also performs better with modern web apps across browsers.
🌐
Testsigma
testsigma.com › home
Playwright vs Puppeteer: Which One to Choose?
May 8, 2025 - Playwright: Playwright takes the lead in this department, offering first-class support for Chromium, Firefox, and WebKit browsers. It even maintains a set of browser patches and custom binaries for optimal performance.
🌐
Thunderbit
thunderbit.com › blog › playwright-vs-puppeteer
Playwright vs Puppeteer: Detailed Comparison
June 17, 2025 - Both Playwright and Puppeteer share some pain points—especially when you scale up: Selector Fragility: Websites change. One tweak to a CSS class or page layout, and your script breaks (). Maintenance becomes a never-ending game of whack-a-mole. Manual Maintenance: Developers spend a lot of time fixing selectors, updating logic, and handling new anti-bot measures (). Performance Bottlenecks: Running real browsers is resource-intensive.
🌐
Bright Data
brightdata.com › blog › web-data › puppeteer-vs-playwright
Puppeteer vs Playwright for Web Scraping
September 16, 2025 - This speed advantage is partially attributed to Playwright’s consistent and significant updates, which have surpassed the more modest updates and bug fixes of Puppeteer. Moreover, Playwright’s ability to support cross-browser testing accelerates testing cycles across different browsers, further boosting its speed performance.
🌐
DEV Community
dev.to › leapcell › playwright-vs-puppeteer-should-you-make-the-switch-4ffb
Playwright vs. Puppeteer: Should You Make the Switch? - DEV Community
February 2, 2025 - Playwright is updated very frequently and has many more new features than Puppeteer! In real - world end - to - end (E2E) tests, Playwright has excellent performance and executes test cases at an extremely fast speed (check the article link ...
🌐
Browserless
browserless.io › blog › 2022 › 08 › 19 › playwright-vs-puppeteer
Playwright vs Puppeteer | Which one to choose for browser automation?
It’s also worth mentioning that Playwright offers a more robust API for automated testing than Puppeteer does. While you can easily integrate Puppeteer in your test suites, Playwright itself offers a great test suite, without the need for third-party testing libraries.