🌐
Skyvern Blog
skyvern.com › blog › puppeteer-vs-playwright-complete-performance-comparison-2025
Puppeteer vs Playwright Performance: Speed Test Results
August 20, 2025 - Playwright showed superior performance with an average execution time of 4.513 seconds compared to Puppeteer's 4.784 seconds in navigation-heavy scenarios. However, other tests show Puppeteer winning the speed debate, with results varying based ...
🌐
BrowserStack
browserstack.com › home › guide › playwright vs puppeteer: which to choose in 2025?
Playwright vs Puppeteer: Which to choose in 2025? | BrowserStack
October 22, 2025 - Playwright and Puppeteer both enable web automation, but Playwright offers more flexibility with network interception, proxy management, and cross-browser support, while Puppeteer is primarily Chromium-focused.
🌐
Checkly
checklyhq.com › blog › puppeteer vs selenium vs playwright
Puppeteer vs Selenium vs Playwright, a speed comparison
November 22, 2024 - ... The first thing that catches one's attention is the large difference between the average execution time for Playwright and Puppeteer, with the latter being almost 30% faster and showing less variation in its performance.
🌐
Reddit
reddit.com › r/javascript › cypress vs selenium vs playwright vs puppeteer speed comparison
r/javascript on Reddit: Cypress vs Selenium vs Playwright vs Puppeteer speed comparison
January 27, 2021 - AFAIK none of the other options support testing against FF or Safari, at least not in any production level capacity, looks like FF is experimental in Puppeteer and Playwright’s approach is iffy. I’ve never had issues with Selenium and don’t understand all the hate it gets, though it is incredibly easy to turn it into a foot gun. ... People who have problems with Selenium are developers who want to be testers. Continue this thread ... What are even the cases where E2E testing speed matters?
🌐
Oxylabs
oxylabs.io › blog › playwright-vs-puppeteer
Playwright vs Puppeteer: The Differences
Proxies enhance Puppeteer and Playwright by preventing some of the anti-scraping measures. Residential Proxies, with ISP-assigned IPs, best mimic real users and reduce detection risks. Datacenter Proxies offer speed and affordability but are easier to flag.
🌐
Better Stack
betterstack.com › community › comparisons › playwright-cypress-puppeteer-selenium-comparison
Playwright vs Puppeteer vs Cypress vs Selenium (E2E testing) | Better Stack Community
Selenium was close behind at 4.590 seconds, followed by Puppeteer with an average of 4.784 seconds. Cypress was the slowest, averaging 9.378 seconds, which is more than double the execution time of Playwright.
🌐
Apify
blog.apify.com › playwright-vs-puppeteer
Playwright vs. Puppeteer: which is better?
March 18, 2025 - Two powerful Node.js libraries: described and compared.
Find elsewhere
🌐
Medium
medium.com › front-end-weekly › playwright-vs-puppeteer-choosing-the-right-browser-automation-tool-in-2024-d46d2cbadf71
Playwright vs Puppeteer: Choosing the Right Browser Automation Tool in 2024 | by Shanika Wickramasinghe | Frontend Weekly | Medium
May 15, 2024 - Playwright supports multiple browsers like Chrome, Firefox, and WebKit, and can automate complex interactions across multiple pages. Puppeteer primarily supports Chrome and Chromium-based browsers and good at high-speed rendering tasks and is ...
🌐
Better Stack
betterstack.com › community › comparisons › playwright-vs-puppeteer
Playwright vs Puppeteer: The Definitive Comparison | Better Stack Community
The performance difference becomes ... workflows. While Puppeteer performs admirably, Playwright's slight speed advantage may benefit high-volume testing environments....
🌐
BrowserCat
browsercat.com › home › blog › playwright vs puppeteer: best choice for web scraping?
Playwright vs Puppeteer: Best Choice for Web Scraping?
Puppeteer might start a Chrome a fraction faster; Playwright might handle 100 pages across 5 browsers more efficiently. If you are extremely concerned about performance (say, scraping thousands of pages as fast as possible), you should conduct ...
🌐
ScrapingAnt
scrapingant.com › blog › playwright-vs-puppeteer
Playwright vs. Puppeteer in 2024 - Which Should You Choose? | ScrapingAnt
August 30, 2024 - According to Microsoft's documentation, Playwright can handle up to 100 parallel browser contexts, which can lead to a substantial increase in scraping speed. Puppeteer is a Node.js library that provides a high-level API over the Chrome DevTools ...
🌐
Medium
rag0g.medium.com › cypress-vs-selenium-vs-playwright-vs-puppeteer-speed-comparison-73fd057c2ae9
Cypress vs Selenium vs Playwright vs Puppeteer speed comparison | by Giovanni Rago | Medium
March 4, 2021 - Cypress seems to be approximating Selenium speed in longer suites, which are the norm in E2E testing. It remains to be seen whether very long-running suites could see Cypress climb up the ranking. Puppeteer’s advantage over Playwright in short tests does not translate to longer executions.
🌐
Webshare
webshare.io › academy-article › puppeteer-vs-playwright
Puppeteer vs. Playwright: Quick Comparison
Renowned for its exceptional speed, Playwright's innovative techniques, such as parallelism and efficient selectors, make it well-suited for demanding testing environments and intricate scraping scenarios.
🌐
ProxiesAPI
proxiesapi.com › articles › playwright-vs-puppeteer-a-side-by-side-comparison-for-test-automation
Playwright vs Puppeteer: A Side-by-Side Comparison for Test Automation | ProxiesAPI
Playwright was built from the ground up for speed. It has lower overhead, optimized network control, and better CPU utilization. Puppeteer is no slouch, but as one engineer put it - "it’s unfair to compare a tool purpose-built for speed ...
🌐
TestGrid
testgrid.io › test automation › playwright vs. puppeteer: choosing the right browser automation library
Playwright vs. Puppeteer: Choosing the Best Web Automation Library
October 22, 2024 - Since Puppeteer is designed by and for Chrome, it is the best option if you’re focusing on this browser, including headless Chrome and Chromium. Works faster than Playwright since it has fewer dependencies and is optimized primarily for Chromium.
🌐
Medium
medium.com › @ritiknegiceo › in-the-dynamic-realm-of-web-automation-and-testing-the-choice-of-the-right-tool-can-significantly-a68ef6bfeb8
PLAYWRIGHT VS. PUPPETEER: CHOOSING THE RIGHT AUTOMATION TOOL | by Ritik Negi | Medium
September 25, 2023 - It leverages techniques such as parallelism and efficient selectors to execute tests and automate tasks swiftly. While Puppeteer is also quite fast, it may not match Playwright’s speed in complex scenarios.
🌐
Testsigma
testsigma.com › home
Playwright vs Puppeteer: Which One to Choose?
May 8, 2025 - While their usage may be similar, they are distinct libraries with their unique architecture and design. In many cases, Playwright is more rapid than Selenium for browser automation tasks.