You’re right that they’re they same. According to the Polkit Wikipedia article,
Since version 0.105, released in 2015 the name of the project was changed from PolicyKit to polkit.
Also, the tag wiki excerpt for policykit is a copy of the first line of the above Wikipedia article,
Polkit (formerly PolicyKit) is a component for controlling system-wide privileges in Unix-like operating systems.
I don’t have enough (any) reputation in these tags to suggest a synonym but I’d recommend that a moderator or high rep user change policykit to be a synonym for the newer name, polkit.
Answer from Anthony Geoghegan on Stack ExchangeYou’re right that they’re they same. According to the Polkit Wikipedia article,
Since version 0.105, released in 2015 the name of the project was changed from PolicyKit to polkit.
Also, the tag wiki excerpt for policykit is a copy of the first line of the above Wikipedia article,
Polkit (formerly PolicyKit) is a component for controlling system-wide privileges in Unix-like operating systems.
I don’t have enough (any) reputation in these tags to suggest a synonym but I’d recommend that a moderator or high rep user change policykit to be a synonym for the newer name, polkit.
Answer from Anthony Geoghegan on Stack ExchangeHello guys, as usual, after the fresh installation of arch I noticed, that I can't reboot or shutdown without sudo. All of this can be fixed with polkit. But there are so many versions of it: gnome, mate, xfce, just a standard package named "polkit" etc. What's the difference between all of them? Should I tweak them, or all of them are already preconfigured?
I'm looking to ditch desktop environments (for the first time) in the coming weeks, and am researching what packages I'd need on a fresh install without one.
I've stumbled across polkits, but I can't find much information about what the differences are. So I suppose my question really is which polkit do you prefer and why?
Edit: I meant polkit authentication agents instead of polkits.