I search for better function to increment a number of 1

So far I have found the following suggestions:

# recursive abacus
def inc(x,n=0): return inc(x^(1<<n),inc(0,n)) if x&(1<<n) else x|x^(1<<n)

# there are 10 type of coders ...
lambda i: i++ (lambda j: j()**j())(type(i)) #halike

# dyslexia
lambda i: (sum(range(x))*2)/x # decrement  #halike

# it's all about the context
lambda i: 2*i-(sum(range(i))*2)/i # banermatt

# mapreducing  
lambda i: __import__('functools').partial(i.__add__, 1)()  #halike

# identity crisis
lambda i: i+(i is i) # SFJulie1 (kind of) #halike

# be real
lambda i: int((x-1j**2).real)  #halike

# TIMTOWTDI
lambda i: int(__import__("os").popen("perl -e'++($a=%d)&&print$a'"%i).read()) # SFJulie1

# Delegation aka someone may know the answer by SciK
lambda i: int(__import__("os").popen("perl -e'use Inline C=>q[int incr(int i){return i-~0^0;}];print incr %d'" % i).read())

# 
lambda i: int((lambda x: x('subprocess').check_output([x('sys').executable, '-c', 'print %d++1'%i])))(__import__)  #halike

# inchworm on a stick
lambda i:-~i # Brian

# regexp is a turing complete machine
lambda i: len(__import__('re').sub('(.)$', '\\1\\1', '1'*i)) #lost-theory (does not work on 0)

#tempis fugit
lambda i: i-(lambda t: int(t.time()-(t.sleep(1),t.time())[1]))(__import__('time'))

# being partial by willm
lambda i:__import__('itertools').dropwhile(lambda m:m==i, __import__('itertools').count(i)).next()

# pushing to the max 
lambda i: next(j for j in range(__import__('sys').maxint) if j > i) # nivertius

#might work by flowblok
lambda i: i+int(round(__import__('random').random()))

# the choice of a GNU generation by sonwell
lambda i: ((lambda rec, i, A, n: rec(rec, i, A, n))(lambda rec, i, A, n: A if i == 0 else i + abs(i - ((i > -1) - (i < 0)) * rec(rec, abs(i) - 1, A * n, n + 1) / abs(i)), i, 1, 2))

#nothing compares to U by cecedille1 (and sinnead O'connors)
lambda u:cmp(u,0) * len(xrange(-1 , i, cmp(u,0) ) ) if u else 1

# it's a kind of magic by ceceddile1
lambda i:(1).__radd__(i)

# the neighbour of the beast by fabzter & samus_
addition = lambda i: int((str(i)[:-1] + {'0': '1', '1': '2', '2': '3', '3': '4', '4': '5', '5': '6', '6': '7', '7': '8', '8': '9'}[str(i)[-1]] if str(i)[-1] in {'0': '1', '1': '2', '2': '3', '3': '4', '4': '5', '5': '6', '6': '7', '7': '8', '8': '9'} else str(addition(int(str(i)[:-1])) if str(i)[:-1] else '1') + '0') if str(i) else '1')

# cloud computing by hhh333
lambda n:float(__import__('re').findall("%d.?\d* \+ 1 = (\d+\.?\d*)"%n,__import__('requests').get("http://google.com/search", params=dict(q="%f+1"%n)).text)[0])

# In the face of ambiguity, refuse the temptation to guess. by gtr053
lambda x:float(raw_input("Pretty please enter the result of %f + 1: "%x))

# pseudomenon : defeats the truth swapping trick True,False=False,True
lambda x: x+(True if True else False)

# polyglot by Book mod SFJulie1 
q = 0 or """ #=;$A=41;sub A { ~-$A+2}; q' """
A=lambda A: -~A  #';
print A(41) # python + perl = <3

# se(ct|x)ually amibuous by Brian
lambda i: __import__('bisect').bisect(xrange(__import__('sys').maxint), i)

Are there even better way to do it?

EDIT: I will soon stop maintaining the page of the solutions.

Soz for pinpinbo solution that did not fit (polyglot is the «fait du prince») and brian core to the metal solution is nice, too.

I really thank everyone, because on one hand I never thought it would have a positive score, and on the other hand I never thought these kind of games were in fact non only fun, but also interesting: Brian & pinpinbo deserve a special mention on how easy it is to bind with C and fortran in python.

For the future I was thinking of hosting it somewhere on a blog ...

https://pastebin.com/5aB7P2Vw

I am not sure what's wrong with my code. Can anyone please advise?