You should not use mutable values in your class variables. Set such values on the instance instead, using the __init__() instance initializer:

class Parent(object):
    def __init__(self):
        self.foobar = ['Hello']

class Child(Parent):
    def __init__(self):
        super(Child, self).__init__()
        self.foobar.append('world')

Otherwise what happens in that the foobar list is shared among not only the instances, but with the subclasses as well.

In any case, you'll have to avoid modifying mutables of parent classes even if you do desire to share state among instances through a mutable class variable; only assignment to a name would create a new variable:

class Parent(object):
    foobar = ['Hello']

class Child(Parent):
    foobar = Parent.foobar + ['world']

where a new foobar variable is created for the Child class. By using assignment, you've created a new list instance and the Parent.foobar mutable is unaffected.

Do take care with nested mutables in such cases; use the copy module to create deep copies if necessary.

You could try passing a Parent instance to the Child initializer...That's probably the closest you'll get.

class Parent:
    def __init__(self, eye_color, length):
        self.eye_color = str(eye_color)
        self.length = length


class Child(Parent):
    def __init__(self, gender, parent):
        super().__init__(parent.eye_color, parent.length)
        self.gender = str(gender)

x = Parent("Blue", 2)
y = Child("Men", x)

print(x.length, x.eye_color)
print(y.gender, x.length)

Another thing you could do is hold a last_parent variable:

global last_parent

class Parent:
        def __init__(self, eye_color, length):
            self.eye_color = str(eye_color)
            self.length = length
            last_parent = self


class Child(Parent):
    def __init__(self, gender):
        super().__init__(last_parent.eye_color, last_parent.length)
        self.gender = str(gender)

x = Parent("Blue", 2)
y = Child("Men")

print(x.length, x.eye_color)
print(y.gender, x.length)

OK, so I didn't realize that you where happy with a static copy of the arguments until I was already halfway done with my solution. But I decided not to waste it, so here it is anyway. The difference from the other solutions is that it will actually get the attributes from the parent even if they updated.

_marker = object()

class Parent(object):

    def __init__(self, x, y, z):
        self.x = x
        self.y = y
        self.z = z

class Child(Parent):

    _inherited = ['x', 'y', 'z']

    def __init__(self, parent):
        self._parent = parent
        self.a = "not got from dad"

    def __getattr__(self, name, default=_marker):
        if name in self._inherited:
            # Get it from papa:
            try:
                return getattr(self._parent, name)
            except AttributeError:
                if default is _marker:
                    raise
                return default

        if name not in self.__dict__:
            raise AttributeError(name)
        return self.__dict__[name]

Now if we do this:

>>> A = Parent('gotten', 'from', 'dad')
>>> B = Child(A)
>>> print "a, b and c is", B.x, B.y, B.z
a, b and c is gotten from dad

>>> print "But x is", B.a
But x is not got from dad

>>> A.x = "updated!"
>>> print "And the child also gets", B.x
And the child also gets updated!

>>> print B.doesnotexist
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "acq.py", line 44, in <module>
    print B.doesnotexist
  File "acq.py", line 32, in __getattr__
    raise AttributeError(name)
AttributeError: doesnotexist

For a more generic version of this, look at the http://pypi.python.org/pypi/Acquisition package. It is in fact, in some cases a bloody need solution.

Since python 3.6, we can now use the __init_subclass__ function, which is called automatically before __init__ of the Child.

class Parent:
    def __init__(self):
        self.text = 'parent'
    
    def __init_subclass__(self):
        Parent.__init__(self)

    def getText(self):
        print(self.text)

class Child1(Parent): pass
class Child2(Parent): pass

classes = [Parent(), Child1(), Child2()]

for item in classes:
    item.getText()

output

parent
parent
parent

If you use your Parent class more as a "interface", here is another example.

class Animal():
    def __init_subclass__(self, sound):
        self.sound = sound

    def make_sound(self):
        print(self.sound)

class Cat(Animal, sound='meow'): pass
class Dog(Animal, sound='woof'): pass

animals = [Cat(), Dog()]

for animal in animals:
    animal.make_sound()

output

meow
woof

You want the instance attribute, not the class attribute, so you should use self._haircolor.

Also, you really should use super in the __init__ in case you decide to change your inheritance to Father or something.

class Child(Mother):
    def __init__(self): 
        super(Child, self).__init__()
    def print_haircolor(self):
        print self._haircolor

What happens is that rep1 won't exist at least you first the method one(). You can do this:

class First:
    def __init__(self):
        self.one()
    def one(self):
        self.rep1 = 'Rep1.\n'

class Second(First):
    def two(self):
        self.rep2 = 'Rep2'
        self.rep1 = self.rep1
        print('From Second: %sFrom First: %s' % (self.rep2, self.rep1))

You can simply access to rep1 as if it were defined in the Second class because of inheritance.

This code creates a shared mylist among all instances of A (or subclasses)

class A(): 
    mylist=[]  

What you want to do is:

class A(): 
    def __init__(self):
        self.mylist=[]  

What you've probably seen is people who do:

class A(): 
    somevariable = a
    def doit(self):
        self.somevariable = 5

This works because it creates a new "somevariable" attribute because you are doing an assignment. Before that all A instances share the same copy of somevariable. As long as you don't change the copy that is fine. When the variable is assigned to, then it gets replaced rather then modified. So that technique is only really safe when the values in question are immutable (i.e. you can't change them, you can only replace them) However, I think that's a really bad idea and you should always assign all variables in init

You can follow this method also.

class BaselineModels:
    def __init__(self):
        self.logpath = './log/models/'
        self.mpath = './models/'

class ALS(BaselineModels):
    def __init__(self):
        super(ALS, self).__init__()
        self.model_name = 'als'

    def run(self):
        df = self.csv_to_df()


als = ALS()
als.mpath
# returns:
'./models/'

In Python, when a class inherits from multiple parent classes, it is called multiple inheritance. In the given code, classes A, B, and C are individual classes without any direct parent classes, but they are used as base classes for the target class D. Even though these classes don't have explicit parent classes, they still require super().init() calls in their init methods because they participate in the method resolution order (MRO) used by Python to determine the order in which the init methods of the parent classes are called.

The Method Resolution Order (MRO) is a specific order in which Python searches for methods and attributes in a class hierarchy. It is determined using the C3 linearization algorithm, which helps to resolve potential ambiguities and conflicts that may arise in multiple inheritance scenarios.

In your example, when you create an instance of class D, it inherits from classes A, B, and C. The MRO is determined in a left-to-right, depth-first manner, so it follows the order of the base classes:

MRO(D) = [D, A, B, C]

Let's break down why the super().init() calls are necessary in each class:

Class A: It has no parent classes, but it's still included in the MRO because it is part of the inheritance chain for class D. The super().init() call in class A will call the init method of class B (the next class in the MRO), which in turn will call the init method of class C. Although class A doesn't have any initialization logic of its own, it is essential to call super().init() to maintain the proper MRO and ensure that the initialization logic of the other classes is executed.

Class B: Similarly to class A, class B doesn't have any direct parent classes but participates in the MRO as part of the inheritance chain for class D. The super().init() call in class B will call the init method of class C, which is the next class in the MRO.

Class C: Class C is the last class in the MRO for class D, and it initializes the attribute z with the value 3.

Class D: Finally, when you create an instance of class D, its init method will be called, and it calls super().init() to trigger the initialization process for classes A, B, and C in the correct order based on the MRO.

As a result, when you create an instance of class D, all the init methods of classes A, B, and C are executed in the correct order, and you end up with an object that has attributes x, y, and z, each initialized with their respective values.

To summarize, even though classes A and B don't have direct parent classes, they are part of the multiple inheritance chain for class D, and the super().init() calls are needed to ensure that the proper MRO is followed, and the initialization logic of all base classes is executed correctly.

You need to set it as self.x = 0 instead of x = 0 - otherwise it's just a local variable.

If you cannot modify A, what you are trying to do is impossible - there is absolutely no way to access that value, not even with black magic (if your method was called by that method, you could probably do nasty things with the stack to get its value)