It is an example of slice notation, and what it does depends on the type of population. If population is a list, this line will create a shallow copy of the list. For an object of type tuple or a str, it will do nothing (the line will do the same without [:]), and for a (say) NumPy array, it will create a new view to the same data.
python - What does [:] mean? - Stack Overflow
What does colon at assignment for list[:] = [...] do in Python - Stack Overflow
How "list" is implemented in Python?
python - What's the difference between [] and {} vs list() and dict()? - Stack Overflow
It is an example of slice notation, and what it does depends on the type of population. If population is a list, this line will create a shallow copy of the list. For an object of type tuple or a str, it will do nothing (the line will do the same without [:]), and for a (say) NumPy array, it will create a new view to the same data.
It might also help to know that a list slice in general makes a copy of part of the list. E.g. population[2:4] will return a list containing population[2] and population[3] (slicing is right-exclusive). Leaving away the left and right index, as in population[:] they default to 0 and length(population) respectively, thereby selecting the entire list. Hence this is a common idiom to make a copy of a list.
This syntax is a slice assignment. A slice of [:] means the entire list. The difference between nums[:] = and nums = is that the latter doesn't replace elements in the original list. This is observable when there are two references to the list
>>> original = [1, 2, 3]
>>> other = original
>>> original[:] = [0, 0] # changes the contents of the list that both
# original and other refer to
>>> other # see below, now you can see the change through other
[0, 0]
To see the difference just remove the [:] from the assignment above.
>>> original = [1, 2, 3]
>>> other = original
>>> original = [0, 0] # original now refers to a different list than other
>>> other # other remains the same
[1, 2, 3]
Note: vincent thorpe's comments below are either incorrect or irrelevant to the question. This is not a matter of value vs reference semantics, nor whether you apply the operator to an lvalue or rvalue.
nums = foo rebinds the name nums to refer to the same object that foo refers to.
nums[:] = foo invokes slice assignment on the object that nums refers to, thus making the contents of the original object a copy of the contents of foo.
Try this:
>>> a = [1,2]
>>> b = [3,4,5]
>>> c = a
>>> c = b
>>> print(a)
[1, 2]
>>> c = a
>>> c[:] = b
>>> print(a)
[3, 4, 5]
Lately finding myself looking around in builtins.py file trying to learn/understand how the language works. Today I was reading about lists and how they work and etc. And as usually I end up in a class list in builtins.py file. I am now surprised that all the functions of list class is empty. For example, method append has 'pass' in it. And that is it.
Here is a code:
class list(object):
"""
Built-in mutable sequence.
If no argument is given, the constructor creates a new empty list.
The argument must be an iterable if specified.
"""
def append(self, *args, **kwargs): # real signature unknown
""" Append object to the end of the list. """
pass
def clear(self, *args, **kwargs): # real signature unknown
""" Remove all items from list. """
pass
def copy(self, *args, **kwargs): # real signature unknown
""" Return a shallow copy of the list. """
passI wonder how this works? Why all methods are empty?
In terms of speed, it's no competition for empty lists/dicts:
>>> from timeit import timeit
>>> timeit("[]")
0.040084982867934334
>>> timeit("list()")
0.17704233359267718
>>> timeit("{}")
0.033620194745424214
>>> timeit("dict()")
0.1821558326547077
and for non-empty:
>>> timeit("[1,2,3]")
0.24316302770330367
>>> timeit("list((1,2,3))")
0.44744206316727286
>>> timeit("list(foo)", setup="foo=(1,2,3)")
0.446036018543964
>>> timeit("{'a':1, 'b':2, 'c':3}")
0.20868602015059423
>>> timeit("dict(a=1, b=2, c=3)")
0.47635635255323905
>>> timeit("dict(bar)", setup="bar=[('a', 1), ('b', 2), ('c', 3)]")
0.9028228448029267
Also, using the bracket notation lets you use list and dictionary comprehensions, which may be reason enough.
In my opinion [] and {} are the most pythonic and readable ways to create empty lists/dicts.
Be wary of set()'s though, for example:
this_set = {5}
some_other_set = {}
Can be confusing. The first creates a set with one element, the second creates an empty dict and not a set.