Don’t have 7000 series. But had a 5900x and could tell you I had the same thing on windows 11 vs windows 10 Answer from Cradenz on reddit.com
🌐
Reddit
reddit.com › r/intel › has anyone switch from ryzen 7000 series to raptor lake?
r/intel on Reddit: Has anyone switch from Ryzen 7000 series to Raptor Lake?
January 2, 2023 -

I have Win 11 22H2 with all the updates for microstutters on my Ryzen 7700x but I think my 8700k has smoother frame times. My GPU is a 3080, I have EXPO enable for 6000 mhz for ram.

Has anybody switched back to Intel & regained smoother frame times?

edit wondering if future BIOS updates can improve performance. (I've never purchased a CPU so near to launch)

🌐
Reddit
reddit.com › r/buildapc › upgrade to intel raptor lake refresh or wait for arrow lake or upgrade to ryzen 7000?
r/buildapc on Reddit: Upgrade to Intel Raptor Lake refresh or wait for Arrow Lake or upgrade to Ryzen 7000?
September 20, 2023 -

I am currently on a Ryzen 3700X and it's bottlenecking my RTX 3080 a bit in a lot of games that I play (games that only use a single core mostly). I have been wanting to upgrade for a while now and as Uni student I am not making much money. I want to save for one big CPU upgrade but I am not sure to which one.

I basically have 3 options:

  1. Get an AM5 board and get the Ryzen 7800X3D. AM5 is still fresh and I can easily upgrade in the future if needed.

  2. Get the upcoming Intel 14700K from the Raptor Lake refresh. That would entail me buying an LGA1700 board tho which has no more headroom for good upgrades in the future. Upside is that I get performance close to the 13900K and 7950X3D.

  3. Wait for Arrow Lake next year. My situation is not extremely dire and I could go with waiting. I have seen the Mobile Meteor Lake stuff and I am very impressed and I would imagine that the 15th gen Intel CPUs will be beasts with a plethora of new features. This makes me think it might be worth waiting for Arrow Lake for all the new stuff that is gonna come with it. But I could also be wrong and they might have stuff that is not useful to me at all and turn out to be just mediocre.

I know this is not a black or white decision but I would simply like to hear a few opinions on what you would do in this situation. One thing that made me sway to go towards Intel is that, as I said, I play lots of games that only use a single CPU core really. I also play many new games that can utilize multiple cores but my main games that I play daily are just mostly games like FFXIV that only use one core. I know that Intel's single core performance is king and will remain king probably so while I love AMD, I was also looking into Intel again.

Edit: if that changes anything, thermals are not a problem in any case. I have a custom loop with 2x 360mm rads and the CPU will be integrated in that custom loop too.

🌐
Reddit
reddit.com › r/intel › ryzen 5000/7000 vs alder/raptor lake idle power consumption (whole system)
r/intel on Reddit: Ryzen 5000/7000 vs Alder/Raptor Lake idle power consumption (whole system)
January 18, 2023 -

We already know Intel CPUs tend to use less power during idle compared to Ryzen series. For example, Alder Lake CPUs consume less than 10w during idle while Ryzen 5000 and 7000 series roughly stay around 20~30w, possibly higher, thanks to their chiplet design and IO.

But I wanted to check if this hold true for the entire system, not just for CPUs alone. And here's what I found.

https://www.guru3d.com/articles_pages/amd_ryzen_5_7600_processor_review,6.html

During idle, 12600k consumed about the same power as 7600 and 7600x did. Strangely 12600k was more power hungry than 13600k.

Guru3d used ASUS ROG Maximus Z690 Hero for 12600k, ASUS ROG Maxiumus Z790 Extreme for 13600k, and ASUS ROG Crosshair X670E Hero for Ryzen 7600 and 7600x.

https://hothardware.com/reviews/amd-ryzen-5-7600-ryzen-7-7700-and-ryzen-9-7900-65w-review?page=3

Again, the whole system for 12600k consumed as much energy as 5800x3d system did.

While Ryzen 7000 series consumed roughly 20w more than 12600k or 13600k, the author stated all 7000 series in this test were paired with a very high end power hungry X670 Extreme chipset. Still, unless someone does another system idle power comparison for 7000 series using different set of AMD motherboards, we won't know for sure.

https://www.techporn.ph/amd-ryzen-5-7600x-desktop-processor-review/

And here the result is consistent with what we would normally expect. All Alder Lake consumed 10w less than 7600x.

Techporn used Gigabyte X670E AORUS Mater for Ryzen 7600x.

https://tech4gamers.com/i7-12700k-vs-5800x/

Performance aside, idle power draw for both 12700k and 5800x were basically the same.

https://www.pcinq.com/ryzen-7700x-7600x-x670e-am5-zen4-review/

Conclusion;

System for Ryzen 7000 series float around 70~80w while some results showed they can go as high as 100w during idle, whereas Intel Alder Lake and Raptor Lake system could go as low as 60w.

Contrary to what most believe, Ryzen 5000 series were actually as power efficient as Intel's Alder and Raptor Lake. And given how power efficient and performant 5800x3d is, it's easily one of the best value option for Ryzen side when you don't need an iGPU.

🌐
Reddit
reddit.com › r/pcmasterrace › intel alderlake vs ryzen 7000 series .. what's your thoughts on new ryzen series ? is ryzen going to to clap intel this time ?
r/pcmasterrace on Reddit: Intel alderlake vs Ryzen 7000 series .. What's your thoughts on new ryzen series ? is ryzen going to to clap intel this time ?
August 31, 2022 - It probably will clap Intel, but Intel will probably be able to maintain parity with Raptor Lake that is due in few weeks, at the very least in value. Intel will also have cheaper boards than comparable AM5 board just because its older.
🌐
Reddit
reddit.com › r/amd › amd ryzen 7 7700x beats intel's raptor lake core i7-13700k & core i5-13600k cpus in gaming benchmarks
r/Amd on Reddit: AMD Ryzen 7 7700X Beats Intel's Raptor Lake Core i7-13700K & Core i5-13600K CPUs In Gaming Benchmarks
October 15, 2022 - And how is AMD going to sell those chips at even higher price when they are barely selling the cheaper 7000 series chips? more reply More replies More replies More replies More replies More replies ... Saying the 7700x beats the 13700k in gaming isnt even accurate. The test has 13th gen with DDR5-5200, and Zen 4 with DDR5-5200 and DDR5-6400. If you actually compare identical RAM speeds 13th gen is faster in gaming. It makes zero sense to compare Zen 4 @ DDR5-6400 to 13th gen @ DDR5-5200, because we already know Alder Lake and Raptor lake can do DDR5-6400 (and beyond).
🌐
Reddit
reddit.com › r/amd › intel reportedly working on "raptor lake refresh", amd ryzen 7000x3d might be limited to 8 cores (for now)
r/Amd on Reddit: Intel reportedly working on "Raptor Lake Refresh", AMD Ryzen 7000X3D might be limited to 8 cores (for now)
November 25, 2022 - Looking at Raptor Lake, Intel has a winner here. And that win is on core count alone, if you care to watch Gamers Nexus or Hardware Unboxed. An enthusiast PC, where you can game, compile, render, cut videos, photoshop etc. is best served today ...
🌐
Reddit
reddit.com › r/civ › any of you using a ryzen 7000 or intel raptor lake chip?
r/civ on Reddit: Any of you using a Ryzen 7000 or Intel Raptor Lake chip?
October 26, 2022 - As this title asks...wondering if any of you are using newer chips from AMD or Intel and if you are, how are they working with Civ. Thanks xD
Find elsewhere
🌐
Reddit
reddit.com › r/amd_stock › amd moves ryzen 7000 "zen 4" cpu launch to 27th september, same day as intel's 13th gen raptor lake unveil
r/AMD_Stock on Reddit: AMD Moves Ryzen 7000 "Zen 4" CPU Launch To 27th September, Same Day As Intel's 13th Gen Raptor Lake Unveil
August 16, 2022 - I believe AMD knows that its Ryzen 7000 series is going to be very strong against Raptor Lake. Perhaps AMD knows that the Ryzen 9 7950X can beat Intel’s Core i9-13900K in many trusted benchmarks.
🌐
AVForums
avforums.com › home › video gaming › pc gaming - hardware and games
Intel 13th gen CPU (Raptor Lake) vs AMD Ryzen 7000 CPU | AVForums
September 21, 2022 - I am now considering both AMD and ... new Intel's GPUs, new AMD GPUs. Only judging by the limited info we have so far, it seems like Raptor Lake is quite comparable to Ryzen 7000....
🌐
Reddit
reddit.com › r/hardware › first raptor lake benchmarks are coming in (passmark)
r/hardware on Reddit: First Raptor Lake Benchmarks Are Coming In (Passmark)
October 18, 2022 -

AMD will have tough competition with $300-$400 CPUs versus $300-$320 Intel ones:

https://www.cpubenchmark.net/compare/4603vs5033vs4692vs5036vs5008/Intel-i5-12600K-vs-AMD-Ryzen-5-7600X-vs-Intel-i7-12700F-vs-AMD-Ryzen-7-7700X-vs-Intel-i5-13600K

The high end has Raptor Lake against Threadripper:
https://www.cpubenchmark.net/compare/3617vs5022vs5027/AMD-Ryzen-Threadripper-3960X-vs-Intel-i9-13900K-vs-AMD-Ryzen-9-7900X

Raptor Lake is topping single thread performance by a good margin:
https://www.cpubenchmark.net/singleThread.html

🌐
Chillblast
chillblast.com › home › blog › intel raptor lake vs. amd ryzen 7000
Intel Raptor Lake vs. AMD Ryzen 7000 - Chillblast
December 13, 2022 - Intel Raptor Lake vs AMD Ryzen 7000 series CPUs is a contest of the ages. This is how they compare across a range of uses and which CPU is best for your needs.
🌐
ScreenRant
screenrant.com › home › tech › tech news › intel raptor lake easily beats amd's ryzen 7000 in leaked benchmark
Intel Raptor Lake Easily Beats AMD's Ryzen 7000 In Leaked Benchmark
September 29, 2022 - A new leaked benchmark shows that Intel's promised 6GHz Raptor Lake processor will be much faster than any other mainstream desktop CPU in the market. In the CPU-Z benchmark, the Core i9-13900KS scored 982 in the single-core test and 18,453 in the multi-thread index, both of which are significantly higher than the scores posted by the vanilla 13900K and the Ryzen 9 7950X.
🌐
AMD Community
community.amd.com › t5 › general-discussions › ryzen-7000-series-vs-raptor-lake-performance › m-p › 552054
Ryzen 7000 series vs Raptor Lake Performance - AMD Community
October 28, 2022 - When comparing the Ryzen 7000 series Raphael with Core 13 Gen Raptor Lake in performance and cost...the Ryzen 7000 series really in bad situation...I don't know why...perhaps with the motherboard bios and chipset issues or compatibility issues with the ram ddr5......
🌐
TechRadar
techradar.com › computing › computing components › cpu
Intel’s mid-range Raptor Lake CPU looks like an AMD Ryzen 7000 killer | TechRadar
October 11, 2022 - At the high-end, AMD’s 7950X ... US MSRPs in all cases here). While the Raptor Lake flagship is 7% more expensive than the 7900X, it outstrips that CPU by 20% in terms of performance here....
🌐
Reddit
reddit.com › r/hardware › strong ryzen 7 5800x3d sales leave raptor lake and zen 4 trailing in its wake
r/hardware on Reddit: Strong Ryzen 7 5800X3D sales leave Raptor Lake and Zen 4 trailing in its wake
October 28, 2022 - Also, I just upgraded from 3700X to 5800X3D myself. :D ... Zen 4 series offers a 29% performance boost on average over Zen 3, it's basically on par with Raptor Lake, wins some, loses some.
🌐
Reddit
reddit.com › r/intel › waiting for meteor lake or buy ryzen 7 now ?
r/intel on Reddit: Waiting for Meteor Lake or buy Ryzen 7 now ?
June 25, 2023 -

Hi everyone

I want to buy a new system, but I don't know if I should wait for Meteor Lake or use the new system by buying an i7 13700k.

On the other hand, if I want to upgrade later, I have to change the RAM(DDR5), motherboard and CPU

Maybe Ryzen 7 7700x is a good investment

I want this system for playing and working with software like Premiere Pro and After Effects

Can you help me make the right decision?

Pay attention to the fact that I don't want to put a graphics card on the system right now because I have a lack of money, that's why I'm worried about the future of upgrading.

Thanks for your help

🌐
Reddit
reddit.com › r/hardware › how to cripple zen 4 in gaming benchmarks: amd zen 4 vs. intel raptor lake memory scaling (hub)
r/hardware on Reddit: How To Cripple Zen 4 In Gaming Benchmarks: AMD Zen 4 vs. Intel Raptor Lake Memory Scaling (HUB)
February 15, 2023 - Totally agree, and I think the cat is out of the bag for AMD. Everyone knows to wait for the X3D variant for gaming and other cache dependent workloads. It's probably a large reason why Ryzen 7000 isn't doing as well as they'd hoped.
🌐
Overclockers UK
forums.overclockers.co.uk › hardware › cpus
Please help me decide - Ryzen 7000 or Raptor Lake for productivity | Overclockers UK Forums
September 28, 2022 - Wait for Raptor Lake it looks like it will compete well with Ryzen 7000, and at lower temperatures and a lower price.
🌐
Reddit
reddit.com › r/buildapc › building my first pc for audio production (intel 13th gen or ryzen 7000 / raptor lake vs zen 4)
r/buildapc on Reddit: Building my first PC for Audio Production (Intel 13th gen or Ryzen 7000 / Raptor Lake vs Zen 4)
November 14, 2022 -

Hello to everyone! This is my first Reddit post as I think I need all the help I can get to get this PC together.

I need a PC for Audio/Music Production. I'll be using mainly Ableton Live 11, Pro Tools, and Reaper 6. I know those DAWs can be used with multi-threading which is good for using a high track count.
I'm used to working with a ton of tracks in a single project, I've used more than 100 tracks and some with virtual instruments in several projects... easily. (I might need to optimize my projects but that's a separate topic). You can find more information about DAW/core handling here: https://help.ableton.com/hc/en-us/articles/209067649-Multi-core-CPU-handling

I'm looking to get a PC with 32gb of RAM, 1tb of NVMe storage (looking to get more NVMe storage in the near future), and here's the big question...

Is it better to get a Ryzen 5 7600 (6 cores, 12 threads) and invest in an AM5 motherboard and DDR5? Or is it better to get an Intel Core i5 13600 (6 P-cores, 8 E-cores, 20 threads) and go with a B660m motherboard and DDR4? (We would upgrade the Intel setup to a new motherboard and DDR5 later on... when DDR5 becomes cheap)

I'm not sure if the new E-cores are going to show any increase or decrease in performance when running a DAW and several plugins and virtual instruments or is it better to stay with the trusty architecture of main cores? Is DDR5 going to give any real improvement compared to DDR4? Is Intel the best option knowing they usually have a new socket every 2 gens? AM5 is worth the money at this moment? Or is it better to get an AMD 7 or 9 5000 series and stuck with it?

I'm NOT going to game, stream, or do any video editing. This is going to be a PC exclusive to audio production so most benchmarks are not going to show what I need.

I really appreciate any insight from any person with any knowledge of PC building or audio production.
Thanks!

EDIT: I went for the i5 13600K and I was the best decision I made last year. I'm able to run the most CPU-hungry plugins without any problems, I can run several instances of U-He Diva without reaching 50% of CPU usage. I thought I could face some compatibility issues with the new Intel Architecture but everything is working great. If you have the money, I'd recommend you to go for the latest intel CPUs but keep in mind if you want DDR5 right away or if you are planning to upgrade soon.

Top answer
1 of 4
5

Ok so looking at what other have replied: no you dont need a mac, there is no advantage in performance, current gen pc are even better. Latency will not be an issue.

Then the guy claiming any 2015 cpu will do couldnt be more wrong.

And then the 13900k is absolute overkill and the 5900x is not the best choice.

Ok so what you want is around 6 or 8 cores and then look at single core performance. As much as DAW want to claim they are good at multicore performance, in reality they are not. What happens is that as soon as you start using instrument or reverb busses, sidechains or basically anything where you connect multiple tracks to each other, you start fucking with the DAWs computing. Once 1 core hits max, all of them do and the prpject will start choking. This leads to situations where your DAW will say you have 100% usage, but in reality you are using 2 cores at 80% and the rest are 40 and lower. Simply put DAWs cant utilise more than 8 cores. You can mitigate somenof the problem depending on workflow and therefore the extent might difer from user to user but I've helped a bunch of people built their music prod builds and i am yet to find anyone who doesnt have this issue. Also i have a 5900x myself.

So i would recommend a 13700 with DDR4 ram considering the overall price/performance.

Interms of storage you wont notice a single difference between a 3.0 nvme drive vs a 4.0 nvme drive. If budget is a big factor a sn570 will do. For something better then a 970 evol plus since it has dram.

2 of 4
3

I don't have any background in audio production, but your question got me curious, so I tried to find some older threads. Here is the best one I found.

https://www.reddit.com/r/musicproduction/comments/ti9ncu/what_computer_should_i_produce_music_on/

Takeaways:

1- Several people recommend Mac

2- In lieu of a Mac it sounds like Ryzen is preferable due to higher core and thread counts.

Have you considered the Ryzen 5900x? It's 12 Cores / 24 threads, uses the more affordable AM3/DDR4, and it is only $340 on Amazon right now.

I personally own the 5600x and it's a beast. I have to imagine it's bigger brother (5900x) would work well for you.