I have Win 11 22H2 with all the updates for microstutters on my Ryzen 7700x but I think my 8700k has smoother frame times. My GPU is a 3080, I have EXPO enable for 6000 mhz for ram.
Has anybody switched back to Intel & regained smoother frame times?
edit wondering if future BIOS updates can improve performance. (I've never purchased a CPU so near to launch)
My 7700X on windows 10 has very smooth frametimes in the majority of games I play, just as good if not better than my previous 10900K build. I’m gonna guess this is windows 11 being a pest and one of the reason I’ve held off upgrading.
Don’t have 7000 series. But had a 5900x and could tell you I had the same thing on windows 11 vs windows 10
I am currently on a Ryzen 3700X and it's bottlenecking my RTX 3080 a bit in a lot of games that I play (games that only use a single core mostly). I have been wanting to upgrade for a while now and as Uni student I am not making much money. I want to save for one big CPU upgrade but I am not sure to which one.
I basically have 3 options:
Get an AM5 board and get the Ryzen 7800X3D. AM5 is still fresh and I can easily upgrade in the future if needed.
Get the upcoming Intel 14700K from the Raptor Lake refresh. That would entail me buying an LGA1700 board tho which has no more headroom for good upgrades in the future. Upside is that I get performance close to the 13900K and 7950X3D.
Wait for Arrow Lake next year. My situation is not extremely dire and I could go with waiting. I have seen the Mobile Meteor Lake stuff and I am very impressed and I would imagine that the 15th gen Intel CPUs will be beasts with a plethora of new features. This makes me think it might be worth waiting for Arrow Lake for all the new stuff that is gonna come with it. But I could also be wrong and they might have stuff that is not useful to me at all and turn out to be just mediocre.
I know this is not a black or white decision but I would simply like to hear a few opinions on what you would do in this situation. One thing that made me sway to go towards Intel is that, as I said, I play lots of games that only use a single CPU core really. I also play many new games that can utilize multiple cores but my main games that I play daily are just mostly games like FFXIV that only use one core. I know that Intel's single core performance is king and will remain king probably so while I love AMD, I was also looking into Intel again.
Edit: if that changes anything, thermals are not a problem in any case. I have a custom loop with 2x 360mm rads and the CPU will be integrated in that custom loop too.
Videos
We already know Intel CPUs tend to use less power during idle compared to Ryzen series. For example, Alder Lake CPUs consume less than 10w during idle while Ryzen 5000 and 7000 series roughly stay around 20~30w, possibly higher, thanks to their chiplet design and IO.
But I wanted to check if this hold true for the entire system, not just for CPUs alone. And here's what I found.
https://www.guru3d.com/articles_pages/amd_ryzen_5_7600_processor_review,6.htmlDuring idle, 12600k consumed about the same power as 7600 and 7600x did. Strangely 12600k was more power hungry than 13600k.
Guru3d used ASUS ROG Maximus Z690 Hero for 12600k, ASUS ROG Maxiumus Z790 Extreme for 13600k, and ASUS ROG Crosshair X670E Hero for Ryzen 7600 and 7600x.
https://hothardware.com/reviews/amd-ryzen-5-7600-ryzen-7-7700-and-ryzen-9-7900-65w-review?page=3Again, the whole system for 12600k consumed as much energy as 5800x3d system did.
While Ryzen 7000 series consumed roughly 20w more than 12600k or 13600k, the author stated all 7000 series in this test were paired with a very high end power hungry X670 Extreme chipset. Still, unless someone does another system idle power comparison for 7000 series using different set of AMD motherboards, we won't know for sure.
https://www.techporn.ph/amd-ryzen-5-7600x-desktop-processor-review/And here the result is consistent with what we would normally expect. All Alder Lake consumed 10w less than 7600x.
Techporn used Gigabyte X670E AORUS Mater for Ryzen 7600x.
https://tech4gamers.com/i7-12700k-vs-5800x/Performance aside, idle power draw for both 12700k and 5800x were basically the same.
https://www.pcinq.com/ryzen-7700x-7600x-x670e-am5-zen4-review/Conclusion;
System for Ryzen 7000 series float around 70~80w while some results showed they can go as high as 100w during idle, whereas Intel Alder Lake and Raptor Lake system could go as low as 60w.
Contrary to what most believe, Ryzen 5000 series were actually as power efficient as Intel's Alder and Raptor Lake. And given how power efficient and performant 5800x3d is, it's easily one of the best value option for Ryzen side when you don't need an iGPU.
I'm upgrading my PC and I already have really good ddr4 ram so if I went with Intel I could still use it would it be worth it to go with Ryzen and getting new ddr5 ram so fair the new Ryzen chips seem like they're better than the 12th gen
AMD will have tough competition with $300-$400 CPUs versus $300-$320 Intel ones:
https://www.cpubenchmark.net/compare/4603vs5033vs4692vs5036vs5008/Intel-i5-12600K-vs-AMD-Ryzen-5-7600X-vs-Intel-i7-12700F-vs-AMD-Ryzen-7-7700X-vs-Intel-i5-13600K
The high end has Raptor Lake against Threadripper:
https://www.cpubenchmark.net/compare/3617vs5022vs5027/AMD-Ryzen-Threadripper-3960X-vs-Intel-i9-13900K-vs-AMD-Ryzen-9-7900X
Raptor Lake is topping single thread performance by a good margin:
https://www.cpubenchmark.net/singleThread.html
AMD made the mistake by pricing both the 7600X and 7700X 50-100$ to high.
While gaming performance might end up close between them. The 13600k will smoke the 7600X in everything else and the same is the case for 7700X vs 13700X.
Realisticaly the 7600X should have been its own class at 250$ while the 7700X should have competed with the 13600k at 330$.
Its gonna be interesting if AMD drops the prices in response to RPL and the supposed bad sales or if they just try to weather the storm until X3D.
This is why competition good. Prices are gonna have to drop on AMD's side.
Hi everyone
I want to buy a new system, but I don't know if I should wait for Meteor Lake or use the new system by buying an i7 13700k.
On the other hand, if I want to upgrade later, I have to change the RAM(DDR5), motherboard and CPU
Maybe Ryzen 7 7700x is a good investment
I want this system for playing and working with software like Premiere Pro and After Effects
Can you help me make the right decision?
Pay attention to the fact that I don't want to put a graphics card on the system right now because I have a lack of money, that's why I'm worried about the future of upgrading.
Thanks for your help
We are expecting 14th gen to be Raptor Lake refresh which fits in the same motherboard as the 13700K so you can upgrade the cpu later if you like.
Intel's integrated graphics have good encoders / decoders for Premiere Pro scrubbing. However, you might not get the best performance in Premiere Pro without a dedicated GPU.
Furthermore, AMD's integrated graphics on the Ryzen 7000 is not on the list of supported GPUs for Premiere Pro: https://helpx.adobe.com/premiere-pro/system-requirements.html#graphics-cards
Meteor Lake does not exist for desktop. Next gen is Raptor Lake Refresh followed by Arrow Lake later in 2024.
I don’t understand your DDR5 comment as the 7700X requires DDR5 and 12th/13th/14th can run DDR4 or DDR5 depending on the board you buy NOW.
None of the iGPUs on these are good or even workable for gaming. Save enough to add at least a basic GPU.
Hello to everyone! This is my first Reddit post as I think I need all the help I can get to get this PC together.
I need a PC for Audio/Music Production. I'll be using mainly Ableton Live 11, Pro Tools, and Reaper 6. I know those DAWs can be used with multi-threading which is good for using a high track count.
I'm used to working with a ton of tracks in a single project, I've used more than 100 tracks and some with virtual instruments in several projects... easily. (I might need to optimize my projects but that's a separate topic). You can find more information about DAW/core handling here: https://help.ableton.com/hc/en-us/articles/209067649-Multi-core-CPU-handling
I'm looking to get a PC with 32gb of RAM, 1tb of NVMe storage (looking to get more NVMe storage in the near future), and here's the big question...
Is it better to get a Ryzen 5 7600 (6 cores, 12 threads) and invest in an AM5 motherboard and DDR5? Or is it better to get an Intel Core i5 13600 (6 P-cores, 8 E-cores, 20 threads) and go with a B660m motherboard and DDR4? (We would upgrade the Intel setup to a new motherboard and DDR5 later on... when DDR5 becomes cheap)
I'm not sure if the new E-cores are going to show any increase or decrease in performance when running a DAW and several plugins and virtual instruments or is it better to stay with the trusty architecture of main cores? Is DDR5 going to give any real improvement compared to DDR4? Is Intel the best option knowing they usually have a new socket every 2 gens? AM5 is worth the money at this moment? Or is it better to get an AMD 7 or 9 5000 series and stuck with it?
I'm NOT going to game, stream, or do any video editing. This is going to be a PC exclusive to audio production so most benchmarks are not going to show what I need.
I really appreciate any insight from any person with any knowledge of PC building or audio production.
Thanks!
EDIT: I went for the i5 13600K and I was the best decision I made last year. I'm able to run the most CPU-hungry plugins without any problems, I can run several instances of U-He Diva without reaching 50% of CPU usage. I thought I could face some compatibility issues with the new Intel Architecture but everything is working great. If you have the money, I'd recommend you to go for the latest intel CPUs but keep in mind if you want DDR5 right away or if you are planning to upgrade soon.
Ok so looking at what other have replied: no you dont need a mac, there is no advantage in performance, current gen pc are even better. Latency will not be an issue.
Then the guy claiming any 2015 cpu will do couldnt be more wrong.
And then the 13900k is absolute overkill and the 5900x is not the best choice.
Ok so what you want is around 6 or 8 cores and then look at single core performance. As much as DAW want to claim they are good at multicore performance, in reality they are not. What happens is that as soon as you start using instrument or reverb busses, sidechains or basically anything where you connect multiple tracks to each other, you start fucking with the DAWs computing. Once 1 core hits max, all of them do and the prpject will start choking. This leads to situations where your DAW will say you have 100% usage, but in reality you are using 2 cores at 80% and the rest are 40 and lower. Simply put DAWs cant utilise more than 8 cores. You can mitigate somenof the problem depending on workflow and therefore the extent might difer from user to user but I've helped a bunch of people built their music prod builds and i am yet to find anyone who doesnt have this issue. Also i have a 5900x myself.
So i would recommend a 13700 with DDR4 ram considering the overall price/performance.
Interms of storage you wont notice a single difference between a 3.0 nvme drive vs a 4.0 nvme drive. If budget is a big factor a sn570 will do. For something better then a 970 evol plus since it has dram.
I don't have any background in audio production, but your question got me curious, so I tried to find some older threads. Here is the best one I found.
https://www.reddit.com/r/musicproduction/comments/ti9ncu/what_computer_should_i_produce_music_on/
Takeaways:
1- Several people recommend Mac
2- In lieu of a Mac it sounds like Ryzen is preferable due to higher core and thread counts.
Have you considered the Ryzen 5900x? It's 12 Cores / 24 threads, uses the more affordable AM3/DDR4, and it is only $340 on Amazon right now.
I personally own the 5600x and it's a beast. I have to imagine it's bigger brother (5900x) would work well for you.