Use the 'range' built-in function. The signature is range(start, stop, step). This produces a sequence that yields numbers, starting with start, and ending if stop has been reached, excluding stop.

>>> range(9,-1,-1)
    range(9, -1, -1)
>>> list(range(9,-1,-1))
    [9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1, 0]
>>> list(range(-2, 6, 2))
    [-2, 0, 2, 4]

The list constructor converts range (which is a python generator), into a list.

There's something troubling about the asymmetry of this:

for i in (1..<5).reverse()

...as opposed to this:

for i in 1..<5 {

It means that every time I want to do a reverse range, I have to remember to put the parentheses, plus I have to write that .reverse() on the end, sticking out like a sore thumb. This is really ugly in comparison to C-style for loops, which are symmetrical counting up and counting down. So I tended to use C-style for loops instead. But in Swift 2.2, C-style for loops are going away! So I've had to scurry around replacing all my decrementing C-style for loops with this ugly .reverse() construct — wondering all the while, why on earth isn't there a reverse-range operator?

But wait! This is Swift — we're allowed to define our own operators!! Here we go:

infix operator >>> {
    associativity none
    precedence 135
}

func >>> <Pos : ForwardIndexType where Pos : Comparable>(end:Pos, start:Pos)
    -> ReverseRandomAccessCollection<(Range<Pos>)> {
        return (start..<end).reverse()
}

So now I'm allowed to say:

for i in 5>>>1 {print(i)} // 4, 3, 2, 1

This covers just the most common case that occurs in my code, but it is far and away the most common case, so it's all I need at present.

I had a kind of internal crisis coming up with the operator. I would have liked to use >.., as being the reverse of ..<, but that's not legal: you can't use a dot after a non-dot, it appears. I considered ..> but decided it was too hard to distinguish from ..<. The nice thing about >>> is that it screams at you: "down to!" (Of course you're free to come up with another operator. But my advice is: for super symmetry, define <<< to do what ..< does, and now you've got <<< and >>> which are symmetrical and easy to type.)

Swift 3 version (Xcode 8 seed 6):

infix operator >>> : RangeFormationPrecedence
func >>><Bound>(maximum: Bound, minimum: Bound) ->
    ReversedRandomAccessCollection<CountableRange<Bound>> 
    where Bound : Comparable, Bound.Stride : Integer {
        return (minimum..<maximum).reversed()
}

Swift 4 version (Xcode 9 beta 3):

infix operator >>> : RangeFormationPrecedence
func >>><Bound>(maximum: Bound, minimum: Bound)
    -> ReversedRandomAccessCollection<CountableRange<Bound>>
    where Bound : Comparable & Strideable { 
        return (minimum..<maximum).reversed()
}

Swift 4.2 version (Xcode 10 beta 1):

infix operator >>> : RangeFormationPrecedence
func >>><Bound>(maximum: Bound, minimum: Bound)
    -> ReversedRandomAccessCollection<Range<Bound>>
    where Bound : Strideable { 
        return (minimum..<maximum).reversed()
}

Swift 5 version (Xcode 10.2.1):

infix operator >>> : RangeFormationPrecedence
func >>><Bound>(maximum: Bound, minimum: Bound)
    -> ReversedCollection<Range<Bound>>
    where Bound : Strideable {
        return (minimum..<maximum).reversed()
}

Let the vector storing the numbers be $v$. Then $v(1)=0.5$ and $v(n)=1.25$ where $n\times 1$ is the size of your vector. Then form a new vector $u$ of size $n\times 1$ such that $$u(i)=v(n+1-i)$$ then $u$ contains the numbers in reversed order.