Screaming Frog is pretty good if your site is less than 500 pages. More on reddit.com

So, a few issues. Firstly, it looks like a white label of a tool that's had been around years ago. For an experiment, I put in Microsoft.com to test one of my favorite pages. You're basically giving binary advice format system that has no contextual understanding of the SEO strategy and I would say this tools is dangerous at best. Lets dig into a few obvious examples Page Title Too short You said the page title is "too short" - this is nonsense. Show me where Google has EVER suggested a page length IF the page is about OFfice 365 and that's the root keyword, then "Office 365" is the exact length a page title needs to be Putting in more doesn't mean rank more or rank higher This is dangerous advice because: Somebody could be first for "Microsoft 365 Consultant" and then add something like "Outlook Mail" and have no topical experience OR there could be no search for "Microsoft 365 consultant - Outlook mail" - and they could lose all of their ranking. SEO isn't about putting in as much content as possible into every page title. You said the home page URL was "clean" and "Excellent" - its hard given that you said the page title was too short and the enormous relationship between the title and the URL in ranking. I hope nobody uses this tool until you come up with one that works More on reddit.com

Google Search Console Google Analytics 4 Google Trends Google Keyword Planner Google Alerts More on reddit.com

I'm new to this environment and for sure this tools are so expensive at least when you are starting out. Any particular reason they cost so much? Is it because of the service itself or rather the value on can obtain by them is really good? More on reddit.com