My opinion is that you should not try to eliminate at all. Instead, you should think about how
and
behave as
varies, find some important points such as the critical points with respect to
and
, and try to sketch the graph from that information.
means that as
goes from
to
,
decreases from
to a local minimum of
at
, then rises to
at
, then falls again to
.
means that
starts and ends at
, with local maxima of
when
, and a local minimum of
at
.
Interestingly, is a critical point for both
and
, both of whose derivatives change sign, so the curve forms a cusp at that point.
That's enough information to follow the curve as goes from
to
: it comes in from the bottom right quadrant
, goes upward and leftward till it hits the cusp
, upon which it turns around, passing smoothly through
where its tangent is horizontal, until it reaches the second cusp
, and then turns around a second time and exits at the bottom left towards
.
This is consistent with the plot arising from Juan Joder's answer.
Answer from user856 on Stack ExchangeVideos
What are the solutions to the equation 4t(3-t)=4t+3 ?
Find the zeros of 4t(3-t)=4t+3
What is Stefan-Boltzmann law?
My opinion is that you should not try to eliminate at all. Instead, you should think about how
and
behave as
varies, find some important points such as the critical points with respect to
and
, and try to sketch the graph from that information.
means that as
goes from
to
,
decreases from
to a local minimum of
at
, then rises to
at
, then falls again to
.
means that
starts and ends at
, with local maxima of
when
, and a local minimum of
at
.
Interestingly, is a critical point for both
and
, both of whose derivatives change sign, so the curve forms a cusp at that point.
That's enough information to follow the curve as goes from
to
: it comes in from the bottom right quadrant
, goes upward and leftward till it hits the cusp
, upon which it turns around, passing smoothly through
where its tangent is horizontal, until it reaches the second cusp
, and then turns around a second time and exits at the bottom left towards
.
This is consistent with the plot arising from Juan Joder's answer.
I wouldn't know how to do it in an exam, but using a Gröbner basis routine such as that in Mathematica easily gives the implicit Cartesian equation
There's roughly $kT$ energy in each active mode. The active modes are characterized by momenta which live inside a sphere of radius proportional to $kT$, which has volume proportional to $T^3$. Multiplying these factors gives $T^4$, and the result clearly generalizes to $T^{d+1}$ in general dimension.
If you know Quantum Mechanics, you know that you can set length to have dimensions of the inverse of energy. This means that $j$ must have dimensions of energy to the four. If you consider that the only variable with energy units is the temperature, then the energy density must be proportional to $T^4$.
If you consider additional constants with energy dimensions, like a mass, then the derivation is no longer valid.