🌐
Medium
medium.com › @Fredtaylor1 › openjdk-temurin-graalvm-which-java-should-you-actually-install-9eb88c1eb8dd
OpenJDK, Temurin, GraalVM… Which Java Should You Actually Install? | by Frederick Taylor | Medium
August 19, 2025 - Are you working with microservices, cloud-native tech, and have an obsessive pursuit of performance and low resource usage? Then you must try GraalVM. For the vast majority of us — like individual developers, students, or small to medium-sized businesses embracing open source — the best choice is either OpenJDK or a high-quality, free build of it (like Temurin or Corretto).
🌐
TrustRadius
trustradius.com › compare-products › eclipse-temurin-vs-openjdk
Compare Eclipse Temurin vs OpenJDK 2026 | TrustRadius
Compare Eclipse Temurin vs OpenJDK. 25 verified user reviews and ratings of features, pros, cons, pricing, support and more.
Discussions

So is Temurin is the de-facto standard JDK?
Nevertheless, every single step away from Oracle is always nice. Considering how scummy they are for not providing LTS Updates for their own trademark product in order to force them to use the commerical JDK instead. That is a really uncharitable take. OpenJDK is primarily developed and maintained by Oracle, and is provided as completely free software (even for commercial use and redistribution). Nobody is forcing anyone to use LTS versions, or to buy commercial support. The team frequently participates on this subreddit (in this thread, even) and are always helpful. Please be a bit more gentle. More on reddit.com
🌐 r/java
70
85
March 6, 2024
java - What are the advantages of installing Eclipse Temurin OpenJDK in place of OpenJDK Deb Package on Debian? - Stack Overflow
I want to switch to OpenJDK 17 ... of deb OpenJDK 17 package? NB: Temurin advantages according to Adoptium are : supports high-quality, TCK certified runtimes and associated technology for use across the Java™ ecosystem ... IMHO this is mostly opinion based. If you just want to work with Java 17 use whatever is easiest to install. If you need to decide between the various versions because of performance constraints ... More on stackoverflow.com
🌐 stackoverflow.com
Is Eclipse Temurin good for production as an OpenJDK replacement?
Temurin is what I use on all of my boxes. It's also what my employer - a Fortune 100 financial with a huge Java footprint - replaced the Oracle jdk with basically across the board. More on reddit.com
🌐 r/linuxadmin
6
10
January 24, 2024
What is Temurin?
I think any Java 11 SDK will be sufficient. There is no real difference which SDK you are going for. Have a look there: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/52431764/difference-between-openjdk-and-adoptium-adoptopenjdk If you are using Linux or MacOS then I advise to install sdkman ( https://sdkman.io/ ) and then switching between SDKs will become just a matter of 3 commands in the terminal. Here is a guide for how to use sdkman: https://www.wimdeblauwe.com/blog/2018/2018-09-26-switching-between-jdk-8-and-11-using-sdkman-/ Ignore that it is talking about Java 8. You can use it with other versions as well. At work I'm using 8.0.265.dh-adpt and 11.0.8.hs-adpt (both from AdoptOpenJDK). But if you get anything else working there then that is also OK. And I would install IntelliJ instead of TMCBeans. Either IntelliJ or Eclipse. But if you are used with Netbeans then go with that. Oh, and if you want to read about Adoptium and Temurin then here is an article: https://blog.adoptopenjdk.net/2021/08/goodbye-adoptopenjdk-hello-adoptium/ More on reddit.com
🌐 r/learnprogramming
4
3
January 24, 2022
🌐
Which JDK
whichjdk.com
Which Version of JDK Should I Use? | whichjdk.com
The OpenJDK is the open source reference implementation of the Java SE Specification, but it is only the source code. Binary distributions are provided by different vendors for a number of supported platforms. These distributions differ in licenses, commercial support, supported platforms, and update frequency. This site gives independent, yet opinionated recommendations. ✅ Recommendation: Use Adoptium Eclipse Temurin ...
🌐
Bell Software
bell-sw.com › blog › oracle-java-alternatives-comparison-of-openjdk-distributions
Alternatives to Oracle Java — Overview of OpenJDK Distributions (2026)
April 21, 2026 - Adoptium has committed to building binaries for LTS releases as long as the corresponding upstream OpenJDK source is actively maintained. For teams evaluating Temurin alongside other distributions, the feature set is deliberately minimal. It is a strength for those who want an uncomplicated, standards-compliant baseline, and a limitation for those who need performance-optimised builds, CRaC checkpoint support, native image compilation, or OpenJFX.
🌐
Foojay
foojay.io › home › which java runtime should you use in production? comparing openjdk distributions
Choosing the Right OpenJDK Distribution for Production
April 20, 2026 - Compare leading OpenJDK distributions for production use, including Temurin, Liberica, Zulu, Corretto, Semeru, Red Hat, SapMachine, and Microsoft Build of OpenJDK. Learn how support, lifecycle, platform alignment, and Java-focused tooling affect the choice.
🌐
Devopskit
devopskit.tech › posts › which jdk image should you use: openjdk, zulu, eclipse temurin?
Which JDK Image Should You Use: OpenJDK, Zulu, Eclipse Temurin? | Real-World DevOps: CI/CD, Monitoring & Kubernetes Guides
August 27, 2025 - A comparison of popular JDK base images — OpenJDK, Zulu, and Eclipse Temurin — to help you choose the right one for your Java applications in Docker. August 27, 2025 · 2 min · 288 words · John Cena | Translations: ... Choosing the right Java Development Kit (JDK) base image for your containerized Java applications can impact stability, performance, and licensing.
🌐
IBM
community.ibm.com › community › user › ibmz-and-linuxone › discussion › jdk-11-temurin-performance-vs-openj9
JDK 11 Temurin performance vs OpenJ9 | Java
Hello,I was wondering if anyone had any performance issues running JDK 11 Temurin.In the past, I've used OpenJDK 8 which had some performance issues running on
🌐
Reddit
reddit.com › r/java › so is temurin is the de-facto standard jdk?
r/java on Reddit: So is Temurin is the de-facto standard JDK?
March 6, 2024 -

Just been browsing through the OpenJDK projects, which probably everyone knows, is an Oracle trademark and provides the "Reference Implementation" JDKs for each release.

Under their "Updates" Project however, for each JDK they are instead recommending people to use Temurin, instead of Oracle's OpenJDK. Source: https://openjdk.org/projects/jdk-updates/

Is it due to Oracle's OpenJDK never having LTS Updates? And does this mean that Temurin is now the de-facto standard OpenJDK build, out of all others?

Nevertheless, every single step away from Oracle is always nice. Considering how scummy they are for not providing LTS Updates for their own trademark product in order to force them to use the commerical JDK instead. Temurin all the way.

Top answer
1 of 12
202
Remember waaay back in the day that you would go to a store and buy a shrink-wrapped carton box, inside of which were 3 things: A CD or two with the actual application. A manual. A warranty / support card you would fill in and toss in a mailbox. It would entitle you to something like 30 days of free support by phoning them. Whilst it wasn't really in the box, you actually bought a fourth thing: That elusive "merchantability" - in most jurisdictions if you pay for a product, you get certain rights that you can't trivially shrink-wrap-sign-away. That the product is even remotely capable of doing what it is advertised as being capable of doing, for example. If you walk into a shop that looks like a bakery and is called 'bakery', and I order "One sandwich please!", and you hand me a rubber sandwich, I can sue you (don't get excited; just for the value of product, not emotional damages or some such) because you didn't deliver on the implicit contract being formed here. Open Source licenses explicitly disavow this one (read any FOSS license, the term will be in there), based on the (to me, anyway, IANAL) solid idea that you aren't paying. When you think about those 4 things, it turns out that it doesn't actually matter who wrote the software that is on those CDs. It is perfectly fine if, say, Yoyodyne incorporated sells one of these boxes (and wrote that manual, and mans those phone lines, and are the party you would sue if the product wildly / neglectfully isn't fit for the clearly communicated purpose), and Intracorp Ltd also sells a box (with their manual, their phone number, etc), and it turns out the actual bytes on those CDs are identical. So what? That's no problem, right? That is EXACTLY how to think about OpenJDK releases! Let's call that a 'packaging': The bytes of the actual software app on that CD are all the same, but, that manual, the phone lines, an arrangement to keep it security-wise up to date in some fashion, the installer, the website, you name it - that's where every 'packaging' can differ. Oracle JDK, Oracle OpenJDK (Those are different things), Azul JDK, Temurin, Coretto - these are all packagings of the exact same thing: The OpenJDK source repo. It's all from the same git branch, it's just - different folks going through the motions to produce binaries, provide websites where you can download them, take care of distributing security updates (which might be as simple as: Hey, downloader? It's all on you mate, you figure it out - but that's still "an arrangement" and notably, one with some legal exposure). It works this way because Oracle does not want the responsibility. They had that responsibility with jusched.exe and the like (where oracle and the end user are jointly responsible for keeping that JVM up to date, which often failed and java was often the butt of security incidents), and oracle no longer wants to have anything to do with it. So, we have: Oracle JVM. A commercial offering (you pay for it). It has support schedules for each version, where LTS versions have much, much longer support. A 'dev' version of this offering is donwloadable but it explicitly disavows absolutely everything, costs nothing, and the license expires the day the next JVM release is out, even for LTS versions. You should not use these, for obvious legal reasons: It's not meant for that, you aren't licensed to use it as general JVM. Oracle OpenJDK. A FOSS offering published directly by the OpenJDK team. These are supported until the next JVM release, and then support ends immediately - there is no such thing as an OpenJDK LTS release at alL! - you should not actually use these because Oracle clearly doesn't want the burden, and, you get no LTS versions here. Temurin. An open source offering that you do want: They support (Weeellll, remember that whole merchantability thing? You don't pay and it's FOSS. They aim to support; you have no legal standing if they don't, of course) their releases and do engage in LTS: Versions that Oracle JVM terms 'LTS' (technically the only canonical meaning of the term 'LTS release' - oracle's commercial offering) are also termed LTS by the adoptium project. corretto - a FOSS-ish offering paid for by amazon. Free, and the JDKs are specifically tested extensively on Amazon's IAAS (Amazon Web Services) offering. Fine to use, especially if you end up running your java code on EC2 or AWS lambda. Azul, SAP, and many other packagings - I think some parties have a free offering but don't use these unless you have an extensive business relationship with these companies. They are consultancies. If you aren't paying they don't give a shit about you: These products are slippery slopes to capture you as a customer. If you know what you are doing and are aware of why these things exist, by all means. If you're already paying these companies, by all means. I've also said that the usual community default (OpenJDK project's own releases) are a bad default - adoptium is better. Same stuff (FOSS, no guarantees not even merchantability), except with a better track record, a much improved support schedule (namely, LTS releases are actually supported for longer), no clear financial incentive to make a bad project (as oracle would prefer you use the commercial Oracle JDK packaging), and motivation for the product itself (vs OpenJDK whose primary job is to make that source code shine, not to make the packaging of it any good). I guess OpenJDK team itself figured this out too. That's nice.
2 of 12
50
Nevertheless, every single step away from Oracle is always nice. Considering how scummy they are for not providing LTS Updates for their own trademark product in order to force them to use the commerical JDK instead. That is a really uncharitable take. OpenJDK is primarily developed and maintained by Oracle, and is provided as completely free software (even for commercial use and redistribution). Nobody is forcing anyone to use LTS versions, or to buy commercial support. The team frequently participates on this subreddit (in this thread, even) and are always helpful. Please be a bit more gentle.
Find elsewhere
🌐
Azul
azul.com › home › products › core › oracle java alternatives: oracle java se vs. the challengers
Oracle Java Alternatives: Oracle Java SE vs. the Challengers
March 24, 2026 - Forrester reports an 129% ROI by Optimizing Java Runtime Performance. ... Insights from over 2,000 global Java users reveal the 2026 Java trends that are powering the next era of innovation. ... Oracle’s surprising January 2023 pivot to pricing commercial support for Java based on an employee count has re-ignited interest in popular OpenJDK distributions. Four alternatives to Oracle Java are Azul Core, Eclipse Temurin, Red Hat OpenJDK and Amazon Corretto.
🌐
Adoptium
adoptium.net
Home | Adoptium
Prebuilt OpenJDK Binaries for Free! ... Run your enterprise applications with confidence using Eclipse Temurin, a secure, high-performance Java runtime rigorously tested for stability and optimized for seamless operation across diverse environments.
🌐
Hacker News
news.ycombinator.com › item
It went from Java to OpenJDK, to Eclipse Temurin (formerly OpenJDK from Eclipse ... | Hacker News
November 1, 2021 - To compare I find a licensing situation on mid-size (50+ direct dependencies) or larger project much harder to comprehend - you need to figure out what licenses are used, if they can be used at all due to the requirements and company's policy, if they are compatible with each other and what's ...
🌐
Medium
raymondmeester.medium.com › java-21-benchmarks-c73812dcb551
Java 21 benchmarks. Following are 16 benchmarks of various… | by Raymond Meester | Medium
December 27, 2023 - OpenJDK (Hotspot) based distributions like Temurin, Bellsoft, Corretto, Microsoft and Zulu didn’t come far behind. OpenJDK (Hotspot) based distributions performed all more or less the same, which was accordance to the question I asked on the Java subreddit.
🌐
Jdkcomparison
jdkcomparison.com
JDK Comparison
JDK Comparison allows you to compare JDKs of the most important vendors side-by-side. Filter and sort them by the features that interest you most, like garbage collectors or support.
🌐
Chriswhocodes
chriswhocodes.com › compare_openjdk11_temurin_jdk11.html
Switch comparison of OpenJDK11 vs Temurin JDK11
Byte-Me · FullJEP · JEPMap · JEPSearch · hsdis · JITWatch · JaCoLine · VM Options Explorer · VM Intrinsics Explorer · GC Explorer
🌐
Oreate AI
oreateai.com › blog › temurin-vs-openjdk-vs-corretto › 1c7b0469c061bce0cbda2844d0be8f58
Temurin vs Openjdk vs Corretto - Oreate AI Blog
January 7, 2026 - If you picture Java as a fine wine, then OpenJDK is its base ingredient—unadulterated and classic. Now that we have our baseline established, let’s dive into two prominent players: Oracle JDK and Temurin (formerly known as AdoptOpenJDK). Oracle JDK has long been considered the gold standard in terms of stability and performance—it’s essentially Java's parent company product.
🌐
TrustRadius
trustradius.com › compare-products › eclipse-temurin-vs-microsoft-build-of-openjdk
Compare Eclipse Temurin vs Microsoft Build of OpenJDK 2026 | TrustRadius
Compare Eclipse Temurin vs Microsoft Build of OpenJDK. 9 verified user reviews and ratings of features, pros, cons, pricing, support and more.
🌐
Piotr's TechBlog
piotrminkowski.com › home › which jdk to choose on kubernetes
Which JDK to Choose on Kubernetes - Piotr's TechBlog
February 17, 2023 - In fact, the difference between the fastest and the slowest average startup time is not large. I get the best result for Eclipse Temurin (7.2s) and the worst for IBM Semeru OpenJ9 (9.05s).
🌐
DEV Community
dev.to › bsanju › rise-of-openjdk-oracle-vs-others-2aem
Rise of OpenJDK & Oracle vs Others - DEV Community
June 26, 2025 - Production JDK Usage (2024): ├── ... Eclipse Temurin: 22.1% │ ├── Amazon Corretto: 15.3% │ ├── Oracle OpenJDK: 12.4% │ ├── Azul Zulu: 7.8% │ └── Red Hat OpenJDK: 3.6% ├── Oracle JDK (Commercial): 23.7% ...
🌐
Reddit
reddit.com › r/linuxadmin › is eclipse temurin good for production as an openjdk replacement?
r/linuxadmin on Reddit: Is Eclipse Temurin good for production as an OpenJDK replacement?
January 24, 2024 -

This is the first I've heard of this project, based on a developer request. My prod OS is Ubuntu 22.04, which does still have OpenJDK packages. However, we're looking to make a few changes, so could conceivably switch. I see Red Hat is contributing to the project now as well. I'm unsure of the politics of these projects, and am mainly looking for the most stable, long-term supportable, open source java available for Ubuntu. Thanks in advance.

https://adoptium.net/temurin/releases/

https://developers.redhat.com/articles/2022/08/24/red-hat-expands-support-java-eclipse-temurin#