About a year ago I changed to Tidal, from Spotify, but I still use Spotify for podcasts. The primary reason as to why I switched to Tidal is the bitrate (I went for their at the time HiFi 1XXX bitrate subscribtion as a student). I had just gotten my Sony WH-1000XM5 at the time, but I often find myself wondering why in the world Tidal does not have certain songs, altough their libary is huge I've never had this problem with Spotify before. So my question is whether or not Tidal is actually better in terms of audio quality when listening though Sony WH-1000XM5, or the Sony Linkbuds-S

Hey everyone,

I am an avid music listener on all my devices and I've been using several different music streaming services over the years to try them all and see which one was the most suitable for me. I was always bouncing between Spotify and Apple Music, and wanted to try out Tidal because of friends' recommendations. I took the free trial month at the end of January, used it for multiple occasions (home, commute, travel...) and here is my review.

Pros:

Starting with the good things, I loved how central the music is! This may seem stupid but Tidal really puts the emphasis on the music service first rather than pushing podcasts or certain artists blindly. This can be seen in the 'clickable' names throughout the interface to see music producers, composer, sound engineer... for EVERY track, how cool is that? I also loved the overall premiumness of the interface, the Tidal built-in playlists are well-organised and easy to navigate. As for songs recommendations, I actually liked them most of the time! One month is short for a service to refine my profile but overall I actually discovered new songs or rediscovered artists who were "lost" in my Spotify/AM daily listening habits.

Sound quality was the biggest hope I had before installing Tidal and I wasn't disappointed. I listened to it through multiple sources, either on wired headphones or speakers (B&W P7 and Edifier) to test the lossless Hifi quality or most often in normal mode on Bluetooth devices (car, Sony WH-1000XM4, AirPods...) and it sounded as good as AM and better than Spotify which does not offer any lossless mode at the moment. I also loved that Tidal took the time to develop quality apps for most of my devices, including standalone iPad and Apple Watch apps which are not merely replicating the iPhone app design.

Pricing was finally quite competitive, especially when compared to the increased prices of AM/Spotify over the last months. For students like myself, Tidal with Hifi quality comes at €4.99/month in Western Europe which is a very enticing offer!

Cons (I'll be more structured here with a bullet point list):

• Search is just BAD. I read before trying Tidal that its search was sometimes imprecise and could lead to unwanted results. I was used to bad search of AM compared to the overall excellent one of Spotify (which works with filters too!) but Tidal is another level below that. Example with the latest song of the British band Depeche Mode: type "Ghost Again" and not "Ghosts Again" with the -s and Tidal won't return you the song, like WHY? It was also a pain in the arse for me to find an artist whose name I misspelled and I had to open Google or Spotify to find the correct one! It is especially irritating in situations where you have little control on your screen like in the car.

• App stability is disappointed. Many times, I ran into the issue of a buggy iOS app when it said it did not have any connection (I had to restart it) or when I started a track and it froze the screen without any reason. AM can also be buggy and Spotify is generally the most stable in that field but Tidal app feels buggy and "sluggish" at certain times.- Library management suffers from the same issue as Spotify. I sometimes read music services can fall either in the playlist-oriented or album-oriented camp. Although Tidal is better than Spotify for that, it just doesn't leave me with the impression I was managing my music library like I do with AM. I am much more an album-oriented person (hence my conclusion below) and missed the smart playlists, the beautiful album grid...

• Tidal lack of popularity can be problematic. This point has different consequences and I'm not talking about the lack of marketing around it (at least in Europe) although this could be a problem for the financial people running the service. Tidal is stuck between two sides, the utterly well-known Spotify which is the most popular among my friends and has many social features (playlist collaboration, availability everywhere, public playlists choice...) and AM which offers a great sound quality (and Dolby Atmos), human-curated playlists, radios and more fine-grained control over your music library. AM is also, just like Spotify, available on many more devices than Tidal. I miss the TV (LG OS) and Playstation apps for instance.

• Personal music management is inferior to AM. Like Spotify, there is no good way to manage local files and merge them with the streaming library. It's one of the main strengths of AM and it does it so smoothly.

Overall, I liked my experience on Tidal but did not find enough pros to counterbalance its cons. The main ones being the fuzzy search and the app stability. For my own use and having mainly Apple devices, AM has a better value proposition with a similar premium sound quality,is available on more devices, a better library management and also more financial value with a student price of €5.99/month which includes the TV video service. Someone looking for better social features could also be disappointed by Tidal and prefer Spotify.

Thanks for your time!