Bo Bennett's site Logically Fallacious provides dialogues for arguments that Bennett considers to be legitimate fallacies and not pseudo-fallacies.
Here are two examples he provides for the Ad Hominem logical fallacy:
My opponent suggests that lowering taxes will be a good idea -- this is coming from a woman who eats a pint of Ben and Jerry’s each night!
Tony wants us to believe that the origin of life was an “accident”. Tony is a godless SOB who has spent more time in jail than in church, so the only information we should consider from him is the best way to make license plates.
Explanations are provided for the examples. Where appropriate exceptions and tips are also offered for these examples.
For the law of excluded middle see False Dilemma.
Bennett, B. "Ad Hominem (Abusive)" Retrieved on May 12, 2019 from Logically Fallacious at https://www.logicallyfallacious.com/tools/lp/Bo/LogicalFallacies/1/Ad_Hominem_Abusive
Answer from Frank Hubeny on Stack ExchangeNew student to philosophy, and I hope this is a legit question, but would you guys be able to reccomend any books/resources that list and explain logical fallacies (straw Manning etc)?
In an argument about something with someone and you notice that your opponent use of the logical fallacies? Just link them to one of the fallacies.
Very useful in topics like r/DebateReligion or r/DebateAnAtheist.
Or r/politics r/news r/worldnews and bashing bias news in general.
And even r/askscience , r/AskReddit and r/changemyview
Hope it helps!
Thanks OP. Because what we really need is more people on reddit who think they dealt a knockout blow in an argument by jumping up and down and shouting STRAWMAN or AD HOMINEM.
YSK that if you have to point out a logical fallacy, you're well on your way to lose that argument. You can't just say "FALLACY, THEREFORE I WIN". They're there to help you identify flaws in your opponent's logic and form an effective counter.