I wrote the entire essay myself (it’s for a creative supplemental prompt). Recently, I ran it through Winston AI, and it flagged it as 100% AI-generated. I just don't know what to do with these AI detectors anymore.

I wonder if colleges will trust these AI results when they run essays through such unreliable programs.

P.S.: I even tried inserting my entire academic research paper (with proper citations), and it said no AI was detected. But for a creative prompt, especially a college supplement, how are you supposed to expect citations?

I tried Winston AI recently while working on some academic content. i mainly wanted to check if my text sounded too AI generated, since i’d used tools like chatgpt just to improve grammar and flow. figured it’s better to be safe than sorry.

the tool itself is simple to use, just paste your content and it gives a score showing how much of it might be AI. what surprised me was how much more sensitive it was compared to turnitin. i ran the same text through both, and while turnitin gave me 0%, Winston AI flagged a noticeable chunk. kind of made me rethink things.

not saying it's perfect, but if you're unsure whether something might come off as ai written, it’s definitely useful for a second look. worked for what i needed, especially when i had to rewrite just a few bits to lower the score. if you're using AI to help with structure or grammar, this kind of tool helps you stay on the safe side.

I had used chatgpt just for checking the academic fluency and grammar. Then i felt Wht if i used it in wrong way.. So i checked AI detection by using these two.. I had heard that faculties mostly use Turnitin.. And my turnitin shows 0% AI while Winston showed 60%.. Now I'm confused, should i rewrite again...

What's ur thoughts and experiences?

I was curious so my gf and I did an accuracy test of some of the most common AI detectors on the market. Turns out, all AI detectors either have a strong bias towards detecting writing as AI-generated or human-generated, with no middle ground. As a general rule, lots of detectors are quite good at detecting AI generated writing BUT, they SUCK at detecting human writing. As a highlight, yhe best performing AI detectors, Winston AI and Sapling on average, detected 100% human writing as only 51.8% and 20.2% human. Now I know this isn't some huge research study but for a layperson, this tells you a lot.

So... that's a huge problem. No wonder so many people are getting ruined by these "detectors" and I suspect a lot of people are actually telling the truth when they say they didn't use AI. I'm curious to hear everyone's experience with AI detectors. Are my findings true for other people as well?

If you want to see the specific data and results: https://gradsimple.com/ai-content-detectors-accuracy-test/

I'm writing an essay, and in the past I've used chatgpt to help. Not getting it to write it for me or anything like that, but getting it to help draw up a plan, or if idk how to phrase somthing ill ask it for suggestion then make my own based on that.

I also send the finnished essay to chatgpt to mark it, and make suggestions on areas to improve, then act on those changes and repeat until I get a grade I'm happy with.

Will doing this now get me flagged by turnitin?

I should also add that all I've mentioned above is allowed, and we have actually had lectures on how to use chat gpt in these ways. But of course if it gets flagged, they won't care and fail me anyway to save face 😂.

Thanks.

How accurate is Winston AI Detector? I copied and pasted my whole essay and it showed 2% human 💀 💀

Hello, has anyone used Winston ai detector for your content written in Bard? I am curious how accurate it is and if it picks up the content as Ai written.

I am using bard to write content for my blog and want to run it through an Ai content detector. I also had a look at undetectable Ai.

if you have any insight that would be great, alternative suggestions also welcome.

Winston AI has emerged as a notable player in the realm of AI content detection, aiming to help users identify whether text has been generated by artificial intelligence tools such as ChatGPT and GPT-4.

While it boasts impressive features and a user-friendly interface, its accuracy and reliability have been subjects of scrutiny. Here's a detailed look at Winston AI based on recent evaluations.

Overview of Winston AI

Winston AI is designed primarily for publishers, educators, and content creators who need to ensure the authenticity of their written material. It employs advanced algorithms to analyze text and detect patterns typically associated with AI-generated content.

The tool also includes Optical Character Recognition (OCR) technology, enabling it to extract text from images and scanned documents, which adds a layer of versatility not commonly found in other detection tools.

Key Features

• AI Detection: Claims to detect content generated by various AI models, providing a score indicating the likelihood of AI authorship.

• OCR Technology: Allows users to scan images or documents for text, including handwritten material.

• Flexible Input Options: Users can paste text directly, upload documents in multiple formats, or import from URLs.

• Plagiarism Checker: Available in higher-tier plans, this feature checks for copied content alongside AI detection.

Performance and Accuracy

Winston AI's accuracy has been tested against various types of content. Here are some notable findings:

• AI-Generated Content: The tool performed well in identifying text produced by ChatGPT and Gemini, scoring 100% accuracy in these tests.

• Human-Written Content: However, it struggled significantly with human-written texts, often misclassifying them as AI-generated. In multiple tests, it failed to correctly identify human-authored pieces, leading to scores indicating they were likely machine-generated.

In summary, while Winston AI can accurately detect certain types of AI-generated content, it has shown unreliable results when assessing human-written material. This inconsistency raises concerns about its overall effectiveness as a detection tool.

Pricing Structure

Winston AI offers a straightforward pricing model:

• Free Trial: Includes access to main features with a limit of 2,000 words but lacks plagiarism detection.

• Essential Plan: Priced at $18/month or $144/year, allows scanning up to 80,000 words per month.

• Advanced Plan: Costs $29/month or $228/year, with increased limits and additional features like team collaboration and plagiarism detection.

Pros and Cons

Pros

• User-friendly interface with easy document uploads.

• OCR capabilities for analyzing images and handwritten texts.

• Provides detailed reports with sentence-by-sentence assessments.

Cons

• Mixed accuracy results; struggles with human-written content.

• Some features may not work consistently (e.g., PDF uploads).

• Higher-tier plans are necessary for full functionality like plagiarism checking.

Conclusion

Winston AI presents a compelling option for those looking to detect AI-generated content. Its advanced features and OCR technology set it apart from many competitors.

However, potential users should be cautious due to its inconsistent accuracy, particularly regarding human-written texts.

If you're considering using Winston AI, it may be worth testing during the free trial period to assess its performance for your specific needs before committing to a paid plan.

I've been testing a few tools lately, and while some like Undetectable AI and Hix are decent, they don't quite meet the mark. Winston AI’s accuracy is unmatched, and finding a humanizer that works against it is a challenge. I’d prefer something effective but also budget-friendly, don’t want to break the bank subscribing to every tool I come across.

Anyone have recommendations for an AI humanizer that can pass Winston AI detection? 👀

I wrote my own personal statement without the help of AI and used my own personal experiences from my childhood and created a symbolic meaning of an object (that related to my essay). Yet, when I run it through Winston AI, it says it's only 6% percent human. There's no way I could have used AI, and AI could not have written the stories I shared. What do I do? I don't want my admissions officer to hold it against me, but what if they do, and I really wrote this piece myself?

Tested a bunch of ai tools and here’s my current top list:

ChatGPT – still my top pick for brainstorming, drafting, and just chatting ideas out.

Winston AI – perfect for checking if content’s human or ai-made, keeps things transparent.

GPTHuman AI– handy for making ai text sound more human and natural.

Narrato – awesome for managing content workflows and drafts.

Hypotenuse AI – solid for ecommerce copy and product descriptions.

Neuroflash – helps nail your brand voice in marketing copy.

LongShot AI – great for long-form content with fact-checking.

Writer.com – keeps brand style consistent across teams.

Scalenut – mixes ai writing with seo research.

Outranking – ai that builds seo-optimized outlines and drafts.

Anyword – love how it does data-driven ad copy.

ClosersCopy – strong for sales letters and conversion content.

ContentBot – quick, short-form posts and startup blurbs.

Katteb – focuses on fact-checked ai articles.

Bertha AI – integrates well with wordpress sites.

INK Editor – writes plus checks seo scores.

Speedwrite – turns rough notes into drafts fast.

Texta.ai – solid for blogs, ads, and social posts.

Copysmith – bulk content for ecommerce stores.

WordHero – budget-friendly for all-around writing.

Jounce AI – built for marketing team workflows.

Which AI writing tool do you prefer? Let’s discuss!!

I am beyond pissed right now

I can swear on whatever you want - God, my mother's life or whatever - that i never fucking used any sort of AI to write anything. Not even a word.

I got an order for a very specific, technical type of text. I spent nights researching this stuff, gave it my absolute best, followed all the guidelines i have been given, yet this morning i got a message from the client that they're rejecting my text. Not because its bad, mind you, but because "unfortunately the Winston AI detector's assessment is that the text is only 35% human written".

How the fuck is this stuff even legal? Not only people like me end up having the time they worked wasted because of false positives like this, clients who i assume use this stuff in good faith have to pay hard money. These bullshit companies advertise "99% dEtEcTiOn AcCuRaCY" and charge money, and then we end up with shit like this. How are these "services" not a well known scam yet? How come there haven't been any lawsuits yet, especially since we had college professors failing entire classes because AI detectors told them somehow ALL the students were cheating"?