Super-sampling is enabled for BB. It looks great. Still has framerate issues around fire but oh well.

More on reddit.com

So much criticism in this thread. This is fucking sick. I love it. Sure it’s “impractical” but it’s fun as fuck, interesting, cool, and it sounds dope!

More on reddit.com

I'm also experimenting with the two tower architecture I think making sure each batch not having the same user multiple times makes sense to me. Maybe if you have enough users this becomes almost a non issue Using the same method to get negative samples in training and validation would be what I would do Including the same users in your training and validation seems to me that there is potential of leakage of information from training to validation. For example, if your user has a lot of features that your model could have to overtrained on, it could skew the validation metrics. I'd definitely take this with a grain of salt as I'm relatively new with this as well. One thing that I ran into was bias with negative sampling. More popular items are more likely to be selected as a negative samples. How have you dealt with this? More on reddit.com

As I’ve been told during my training and recertification classes (by Jim Galvin) “If it is round and you can get it to flow then you can use it!” The issue here would be if the AHJ had an issue with the material. Some jurisdictions specify copper or CPVC only, but this may not be an issue since it isn’t in a plenum space. Edit: didn’t see the second picture. That may be an issue as it can cause a disturbance in the airflow, but this would be a question for VESDA and not code authority. Using conduit would be perfectly acceptable, I just don’t know about the fitting that is installed. But in my general experience, once you get it to flow and have it dialed in properly then just about anything is permissible. I’ve had Jim and a couple of the VESDA technical guys on a few of my project sites and I’ve heard “I never would have imagined that, but it works and there isn’t anything that prohibits it so you’re good to go”. I had a data center where I networked 63 detectors that I had one of their techs come out pre-acceptance to run through the system to see if there was anything that I’d missed or could make it better - I ended up missing a sensitivity change during the after hours settings. I had another data center in which i was having a tough time getting a layout because I had no clearance to get into the subfloor because it was so full. I designed the system to drop down through their racks with flexible tubing from the CPVC network above. More on reddit.com