🌐
DZone
dzone.com › data engineering › databases › rds, redshift, dynamodb, and aurora – how do they compare?
RDS, Redshift, DynamoDB, and Aurora – How Do They Compare?
April 3, 2020 - RDS – RDS’s storage limit depends on which engine you’re running, but it tops out at 64 TB using Amazon Aurora. SQL accommodates 16 TB, and all the other engines allow for 32TB. Redshift – Redshift’s max capacity is much higher at 2PB.
🌐
Reddit
reddit.com › r/aws › deciding between rds and redshift for "data warehouse"
r/aws on Reddit: Deciding between RDS and Redshift for "data warehouse"
January 27, 2023 -

Hi all,

I have a business request to ETL data from several sources into a data warehouse to run BI tools on (Tableau or PowerBI for example).

The dataset isn't that big, 400GB growing 4GB per week. I can't find any good explanation on if I should use RDS or Redshift to store the data.

Can anyone with experience on this topic guide me please?

Thank you!

Discussions

amazon web services - AWS Redshift or RDS for a Data warehouse? - Stack Overflow
We are currently evaluating Redshift but never used the service before. Also, we thought of some snowflake schema(some kind of fact table with dimensions) in an RDS because is intended to store 10GB to 100GB but don't know how much this approach can scale. ... AWS RDS and Aurora databases are ... More on stackoverflow.com
🌐 stackoverflow.com
Deciding between RDS and Redshift for "data warehouse"
You can go for Aurora first then migrate to redshift when your data gets around 5Tb or so, that’s my estimate in which the query starts to get slow in a rds and dwh will be much faster More on reddit.com
🌐 r/aws
10
6
January 27, 2023
DynamoDB or Aurora or RDS?
Try this search for more information on this topic. Comments, questions or suggestions regarding this autoresponse? Please send them here . I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns. More on reddit.com
🌐 r/aws
36
21
December 2, 2024
RDS vs Aurora big price difference
Hello, PM for Amazon RDS and Aurora here. We recommend Amazon Aurora Serverless for bursty workloads that spike up/down frequently. Think an e-commerce website which gets a lot of traffic on weekends and nothing on weekdays. Our customers love not having to scale the database to account for the surge or drop in traffic. Amazon RDS and "regular" Amazon Aurora are for workloads that need sustained throughput. Think a search website which gets traffic throughout the day/week etc. Hope that helps! More on reddit.com
🌐 r/aws
49
51
May 10, 2020
People also ask

What is the difference between Redshift and RDS?
Purpose: Redshift is designed for data warehousing and analytics (OLAP), while RDS (Relational Database Service) is designed for transactional database workloads (OLTP).
Performance: Redshift utilizes a columnar storage format and is optimized for complex queries and large datasets, whereas RDS is optimized for high-speed transactions and relational data operations.
Scalability: Redshift can scale to handle petabyte-scale data warehouses, while RDS is more focused on scaling for standard database applications.
🌐
hevodata.com
hevodata.com › home › blog › data warehousing
Amazon Redshift vs Aurora: 9 Critical Differences
Which is better, Aurora or Redshift?
Choosing between Aurora and Redshift depends on the use case. Aurora is better for transactional workloads and applications that require high availability and low-latency access to data. Redshift, on the other hand, is optimized for analytical workloads, providing fast query performance on large datasets for business intelligence and reporting.
🌐
hevodata.com
hevodata.com › home › blog › data warehousing
Amazon Redshift vs Aurora: 9 Critical Differences
Is Aurora OLAP or OLTP?
Aurora is primarily designed for OLTP (Online Transaction Processing) workloads, focusing on high availability, low-latency performance, and transactional integrity for applications requiring real-time data processing. However, it can also support some analytical queries, but it is not optimized for OLAP.
🌐
hevodata.com
hevodata.com › home › blog › data warehousing
Amazon Redshift vs Aurora: 9 Critical Differences
🌐
TechTarget
techtarget.com › searchcloudcomputing › tip › When-to-use-Amazon-RDS-vs-Redshift
When to use Amazon RDS vs. Redshift | TechTarget
Redshift can store many large data sets, up to 128 TB per node, potentially reaching petabytes of data in a cluster. Most RDS engines have a storage limit of 70 TB, while Aurora has a limit of 140 TB.
🌐
Medium
medium.com › @abylead › aws-database-overview-rds-vs-aurora-vs-redshift-vs-dynamodb-7eeebb61ca98
Amazon RDS vs Redshift vs DynamoDB Database
November 12, 2023 - For SQL, the answer is simple with ... handle a bit of JSON documents. RDS is a standardized service on its instance with seven optional SQL database engines and Aurora provides two of them....
🌐
AWS
docs.aws.amazon.com › databases-on-aws-how-to-choose
Amazon
Amazon Redshift is a fully managed, cloud-based data warehousing service that handles large-scale analytics workloads. There are two high-level categories of AWS OLTP databases—relational and non-relational. ... The AWS relational database family includes eight popular engines for Amazon Aurora ...
🌐
Medium
medium.com › @singhsaloni890 › learning-aws-day-by-day-day-37-amazon-rds-redshift-and-aurora-overview-8bb396b22f77
Learning AWS Day by Day — Day 37 — Amazon RDS, RedShift and Aurora — Overview | by Saloni Singh | Medium
April 15, 2024 - - Allows you to create database in cloud that are managed by AWS - supports: Postgres, MySQL, MariaDB, Oracle, MS SQL server, Aurora (AWS proprietary database) Advantages over using RDS v/s deploying Database on EC2: - RDS is a managed service - Automated provisioning, OS patching - Continuous backups and restore to specific timestamp (Point-In-Time-Restore) - Monitoring dashboards - Multi-AZ setup for Disaster recovery - Maintenance window for upgrades - Scaling capability (vertical and horizontal) - Storage backed by EBS - Can’t SSH into instance · Amazon RedShift: - user columnar data storage - unlike SQL, data is not stored in rows but in columns, which is ideal for data warehousing.
🌐
Medium
thedataexplorer.medium.com › relational-databases-97bc97af7ad5
What are the differences between RDS vs. Redshift vs. Redshift Serverless vs. Aurora? | by The Data Explorer | Medium
July 5, 2024 - RDS — RDS’s storage limit depends on which engine you’re running, but it tops out at 64 TB using Amazon Aurora. SQL accommodates 16 TB, and all the other engines allow for 32TB. Redshift — Redshift’s max capacity is much higher at 2PB.
Find elsewhere
🌐
Just After Midnight
justaftermidnight247.com › insights › rds-redshift-dynamodb-and-aurora-how-do-aws-managed-databases-compare
RDS, Redshift, DynamoDB and Aurora - how do AWS’ managed databases compare? | Just After Midnight
January 23, 2026 - Aurora is also an enterprise solution, even when used with RDS. RDS – Because RDS is less complex, it’s easier to scale – requiring just a few clicks on the AWS Console to determine an auto-scale max capacity. It can be run using a reserved capacity or on-demand. Redshift – Redshift’s infrastructure is more complicated, meaning there’ll be more downtime and complexity involved in scaling.
🌐
Hevo Data
hevodata.com › home › blog › data warehousing
Amazon Redshift vs Aurora: 9 Critical Differences
January 27, 2026 - Aurora is better for transactional workloads and applications that require high availability and low-latency access to data. Redshift, on the other hand, is optimized for analytical workloads, providing fast query performance on large datasets ...
🌐
DataCamp
datacamp.com › blog › rds-vs-aurora
Amazon RDS vs Aurora: Which is Right For Your Data Workload? | DataCamp
March 23, 2025 - An example of the Amazon Aurora architecture diagram - Source: AWS · Learn to optimize AWS services for cost efficiency and performance. ... Both RDS and Aurora simplify database administration, but they have key differences in performance, cost, scalability, availability, and fault tolerance.
🌐
Hevo Data
hevodata.com › home › blog › data warehousing
Amazon Redshift Vs RDS Comparison: 9 Critical Factors
January 27, 2026 - Storage scaling will depend on ... database engine. Redshift is a completely managed data warehouse as a service and can scale up to petabytes of data while offering lightning-fast querying performance....
🌐
GeeksforGeeks
geeksforgeeks.org › dbms › difference-between-amazon-aurora-and-amazon-redshift
Difference between Amazon Aurora and Amazon Redshift - GeeksforGeeks
August 6, 2025 - Features of Aurora have distributed fault-tolerant and self-healing storage system. 2. Amazon Redshift : Amazon Redshift is an efficient solution to collect and store all your data and enables you to analyze it.
🌐
AWS
aws.amazon.com › what is cloud computing? › databases › compare amazon aurora and amazon rds
Differences between Amazon Aurora and Amazon RDS - AWS
2 weeks ago - Compare Amazon Aurora and Amazon RDS side by side. Aurora offers up to 5x MySQL performance with cloud-native architecture; RDS provides familiar engines with managed infrastructure. See features, pricing, use cases, and expert guidance to choose the right AWS relational database.
🌐
The New Stack
thenewstack.io › home › amazon aurora vs. redshift: what you need to know
Amazon Aurora vs. Redshift: What You Need to Know - The New Stack
May 25, 2023 - Aurora also offers a low-cost pricing structure, enterprise-grade security features and the ability to scale with ease. With this service, businesses can build and maintain sophisticated applications that require high performance, scalability and availability. Amazon Redshift is a petabyte-scale data warehouse service that can store and analyze vast amounts of data quickly and easily.
🌐
K21 Academy
k21academy.com › aws-cloud › aws-database-service-amazon-rds-aurora-dynamodb-elasticache
AWS Database Services | Amazon Aurora, RDS, DynamoDB
June 6, 2023 - Each cluster contains one or more databases and runs an Amazon Redshift engine. The type and number of compute nodes that you need depend on the size of your data, the number of queries you will execute, and the query execution performance that you need. Read More: About AWS Elastic Load Balancers. Click here · The managed relational database service offered by AWS is called Amazon Aurora.
🌐
Satori
satoricyber.com › home › amazon redshift vs. amazon rds
Amazon Redshift Vs. Amazon RDS - Satori Cyber
April 22, 2023 - With its large type instance, AWS Redshift has a limit of 2 PB. Because RDS works with individual virtualized instances, the storage limit is in the TBs and varies depending on the database engine selected. The storage capacity of the SQL server gets restricted to 16 TB. However, the Aurora engine can extend up to 64 TB.
🌐
CloudThat
cloudthat.com › home › blogs › comparison between amazon rds and amazon redshift
Comparison between Amazon RDS and Amazon Redshift
June 25, 2024 - Routine database functions, including ... are handled by Amazon RDS. ... A petabyte-scale data warehouse service called Amazon Redshift is quick, potent, and completely managed in the cloud....
🌐
TechTarget
techtarget.com › searchcloudcomputing › answer › When-should-I-use-Amazon-RDS-vs-Aurora-Serverless
Amazon RDS vs. Aurora Serverless: What's the better option? | TechTarget
Amazon RDS is a managed service that launches and maintains database servers in the cloud. This service enables developers to choose database instance type and size. Users can also select a database engine, including Amazon Aurora, PostgreSQL, MySQL, MariaDB, Oracle and Microsoft SQL Server.
🌐
CloudZero
cloudzero.com › home › blog › aurora vs. rds: choosing the best aws database solution
Aurora Vs. RDS: Choosing The Best AWS Database Solution
May 15, 2026 - Overall, RDS is a great option for businesses that need a reliable, scalable, and cost-effective database solution. ... 260 senior finance leaders (more than half CFOs) told us why the speed of seeing AI spend, not the size of it, separates who pulls ahead on AI from who gets burned. ... Amazon Aurora is one of RDS’s database engines.