Google Antigravity

I've been using it today and it works really well. One nice thing I've noticed is that even if one model hits the limit, I can switch to another model and ask it to just continue from where the previous model stopped. It's very seamless and the flow is pretty good too I think. I used some other IDEs like windsurf and cursor before and I think this is even better. More on reddit.com

The multi-agent orchestration is a nice UI, but like you say, it just makes it easier to do lazy vibe-coding. I also find that Gemini 3.0 is way more aggressive at doing stuff you probably don’t want. I started it in the wrong directory yesterday, and rather than stopping and telling me it didn’t have permissions, it was writing shell scripts to try and edit folders it didn’t have access to via normal tools! Very scary. For me, CLI tools are the sweet spot - make it write a design doc you give feedback on first. Let it run in yolo mode, but review the PR on GitHub just like you would with a junior dev. I also never like letting any agent touch git commands aside from log and diff - takes an extra 30 seconds to write commit messages but I don’t have to worry about it doing a bad rebase or force push, which is basically the only way it can seriously screw up more than an hour’s worth of work. More on reddit.com

It's not just X, it's Y!!!!! More on reddit.com

Are these agent features useful for beginners? In my honest opinion: People who are learning should not use any AI to generate any kind of code. Can it help understand code (esp. with AI explanations)? Sure. How reliable is the auto-refactor and API testing (from inside the IDE)? As reliable as any LLM can be: Not reliable enough. Would you pick it over Cursor or Copilot, especially for learning workflows? For learners, I'd look for an editor that does less, not more. Fewer bells and whistles = the more thinking you have to do = the more you learn because you have to think and solve the problems. More on reddit.com