I’m focusing on the Ultra here given the cost of the device and the physical robustness of it, but it could in theory apply to any Apple Watch…

One of the criticisms of smart watches is that they are “disposable,” especially compared to traditional mechanical watches. But do they have to be?

1. The Apple Watch Ultra is made of titanium and sapphire glass. My band is also made of titanium. These durable, premium matetials should last for decades, right? Mechanical watches made out of the same grade of steel, titanium also last for decades.

2. The software provides the time, notifications, various complications, and various health sensors. As long as Apple software supports these functions and the electrical systems and chip systems of the device remain intact, why shouldn’t the device be able to do these tasks indefinitely? Lack of ability to these things 5, 10, 20 years from now would seem to be a software decision rather than a hardware limitation.

3. My battery capacity is at 100% after two years. The battery will surely degrade over time. However- shouldn’t the battery be replaceable by Apple (or be replaceable in a future design)?

In short - I don’t see much about the physical device that limits the longevity of an Apple Watch made of durable metal. Any obsolescence seems to really be a software and support issue. Personally I don’t see why I wouldn’t want to wear my current AWU for another decade.