🌐
Nithin Bekal
nithinbekal.com › posts › galaxy-watch-7-ultra
Review: Galaxy Watch 7 Ultra
Galaxy Watch 7 Ultra
Nithin Bekal's blog about programming - Ruby, Rails, Vim, Elixir.
Rating: 4 ​
🌐
CNET
cnet.com › tech › mobile › smartwatches › galaxy watch 7 and ultra review: samsung squares up its smartwatches
Galaxy Watch 7 and Ultra Review: Samsung Squares Up Its Smartwatches - CNET
Galaxy Watch Ultra and Galaxy Watch 7
Samsung finally has a watch worthy of the Ultra name. But for most people, the Galaxy Watch 7 will be the better buy.
Rating: 8.4/10 ​
🌐
PCMAG
pcmag.com › home › reviews › wearables
Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra Review | PCMag
Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra
Outside of the Quick Button, the experience of setting up, controlling, and even customizing the Galaxy Watch Ultra is the same as on the Galaxy Watch 7. Check out my review of the Galaxy Watch 7 for more details. Since both watches run Wear OS, the app selection is also the same. A rugged Wear OS watch with good-enough battery life
Rating: 4 ​
🌐
Reddit
reddit.com › r/galaxywatch › the official galaxy watch ultra review after a month.
r/GalaxyWatch on Reddit: The official Galaxy Watch Ultra review after a month.
September 7, 2024 -

Tl;dr: If you want the best of the best, now in Android; get this watch.

I've had the Galaxy Watch Ultra for a month now and in that time I've found it to be the best and most complete Samsung smartwatch. In this review, I'll talk about what I like and what I don't like about this watch in no particular order, hoping that it can shed some light on interesting topics such as design, battery life, and the functionality and precision of its sensors.

First of all, let's talk about Samsung copying Apple. Indeed, the entire concept of an "Ultra" smartwatch first came from Apple and THAT is what Samsung is copying. From the straps to the use of orange on the action button to the siren and night mode; you can clearly see the inspiration that the South Korean company took from the Silicon Valley one. However, what Samsung was really original about was the design of the watch itself. Called "squircle" (square and circle = squircle), the design of this watch is actually inspired by Samsung's Gear Sport. And I understand why they didn't change the circular design, because otherwise they would have to completely redesign the software of their watch to adapt it to the new Ultra. Anyway, companies always copy everything. The Always On Display Apple took from Android, as well as the Widgets on the home screen, or the use of type C cables for charging, and even the first (between Samsung and Apple) to reach the smartwatch market was Samsung with the legendary Galaxy Gear. Two years before the first Apple Watch. Apple even took the word "Ultra" from Samsung and its premium line. Samsung has also taken inspiration from Apple: generally for the worse, such as removing the charger from the phone boxes, leaving the price the same. In short, companies copy each other over and over again but that only means benefits for users by having more options.

Regarding the design of the watch, I think the bezel and the titanium plate on which the watch face rests are a good idea. It is an elegant and whimsical design; because it does not look like your conventional watch and does not pretend to be discreet. Its orange accents give it an almost stealthy but at the same time striking appearance. Depending on the watch face you use (I always try to get one that matches the orange accents), it will turn heads wherever you go. I find it very disappointing that the entire body of the watch is not titanium; it is a very hard and durable plastic but it is not metal. I wouldn't have minded if it were aluminum or something similar, and perhaps because of the antennas (LTE and dual-band GPS) it is necessary to opt for a plastic case but in my opinion it takes away from the seriousness and premium feel of the watch.

I do have to say that the design of the Watch Ultra (and the Buds 3 Pro too, oddly) doesn't feel Samsung... Its hard to explain - but the design choices are so off with what the brand has brought to the table before. I like both of them but again, they don't feel Samsung.

As for battery independence, I am someone who does not like to limit the functions of my devices to have greater autonomy. I do not want to limit the AOD (Always On Display), nor the heart rate metrics, and I am constantly using contactless payments with google wallet and recording walking sessions around the city. So the battery life that I have is relatively short. It can last me from a day and a half to two days. To give an example, I currently have 80% battery, having used it for 6.5 hours and with all the functions active. The app says that I have one day with 14 hours left.

You can extend the battery yes, but by limiting the functions of the watch. Although I did not buy nor do I recommend cutting the functions of the watch in half to have greater autonomy, but again; everyone has different priorities.

As for the OS and processing power; its fast. Its buttery smooth. Its almost flawless. I'm coming from a Galaxy Watch 4 Classic and it's day and night difference. Its like a 70 year old running against The Flash. My old watch used to stutter, lag, sometimes it wouldn't even be able to activate a routine because... Idk it got confused or something. But this watch is amazingly smooth, finally having a good experience while using a Samsung Smartwatch. Can switch modes with ease, start timers, pay, change watch faces... Everything smoothly. Honestly, its quite impressive.

The action button only has 4 options; workout tracking, water lock, torch or a stopwatch. Its nice and all, but I alway say that if you can't do something (digitally) its because it hasnt been designed yet. I feel like we should be able to have a tap, long press, and double tap options for the action button. Otherwise its kinda lacking in my opinion.

Regarding the AGE's index, I did not understand it, its metrics are not clear and it is not really information that is useful to me. I have that feature deactivated.

On the other hand, I found the energy score to be accurate and very useful. It takes into account factors such as quality, consistency and hours of sleep, as well as physical activity from the previous day to give you an energy score and how you can make the most of your day. Whether by exercising more or taking a break.

The accuracy of the heart rate and oxygen saturation sensors are relatively accurate based on other professional measurements made by third parties. In general they can correctly track changes in BPM and 0²sat, but these should be taken as a guide and not as a law. This is because there are many factors that influence a good measurement; if the watch is adjusted correctly, if the sensors are clean, if the hands vibrate or shake (when lifting weights or riding a dirt bike, for example) and so on. Even people with tattoos (in the area where they wear their watch and under the sensors) have pointed out that the readings are wrong. It is important to consider that.

Regarding the dual-band GPS, I have not had such positive results because I generally use it in parks surrounded by trees and tall buildings that affect the signal. Which should not happen. However, third parties have found favorable results so it will depend on the circumstances.

Regarding watch bands, I've tried both the marine and alpine loop (ahem, trail band) and I honestly couldn't say which one I like more. The marine band feels sturdy and secure, while also being very flashy and gorgeous. Honestly, I take this one clubbing and partying the most. As for the trail band, I really like it; it looks stealthy and elegant. Its material is really stretchy; however, I've encountered some problems. Maybe it's me having to get used to it, but I see some red marks as if the band were too tight... Only that I could easily fit another three fingers when I stretch it between my wrist and my watch... Vertically. I don't know why that is, but it feels more like a relief when I take it off. Which is sad because I think I do like this one more aesthetically.

Finally; the Galaxy Watch Ultra is a watch that Samsung designed for high-performance athletes committed to their sport. However, I think it's also a watch for those looking for the best of the best in Android smartwatches. The adventurous and elegant design, especially of its Black and White editions, make it a must-have candidate for all kinds of situations, whether deep in the jungle, the sea or the tundra, as well as in meetings, outings and other social events.

Lmk if you have any questions. I'll do my best to answer them

🌐
Sypnotix
sypnotix.com › reviews › samsung-galaxy-watch-ultra-review
Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra Review — Sypnotix
February 27, 2025 - Occasionally I found some inaccuracies with my step count that probably had correlation with other physical activities my watch hand was currently doing. However, even the biggest pedometer discrepancies are within a tolerable range of error when compared to other modern pedometers I currently utilize. At the end of the day, I did find the Galaxy Ultra to be trustworthy enough to rely on for valid numbers.
🌐
Tom's Guide
tomsguide.com › wellness › smartwatches
I’ve avoided smartwatches for years but a month with the Galaxy Watch Ultra changed my mind | Tom's Guide
October 2, 2024 - Somehow I got sent the high-end Galaxy Watch Ultra which retails for $649. That was a surprising package to open. I have to admit the watch looks pretty slick. Personally, I would have preferred if Samsung had kept the case shape round instead of a circular face stuffed into a square body. It’s also a fairly large watch at 47mm compared to the 40 and 44mm sizes for the Watch 7.
🌐
TechRadar
techradar.com › health & fitness › smartwatches
Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra review: Technically Samsung’s best watch yet | TechRadar
Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra review: Technically Samsung’s best watch yet
However, it is pricey, and unless ... withstand knocks, a Galaxy Watch 7 is going to be better value. However, if you want a Wear OS adventure watch, and if you can put up with recharging the watch a few times a week, the Galaxy Watch Ultra is a very reasonable purchase at this ... A powerful, slightly flawed smartwatch
Rating: 4 ​
🌐
PCMAG
pcmag.com › home › reviews › wearables
Samsung Galaxy Watch 7 Review | PCMag
Samsung Galaxy Watch 7
Those last two features go above ... Watch Ultra 2, which also can’t detect snoring. Something else to consider is that neither of the Apple Watch models allows for blood oxygen saturation monitoring in the US. In our review of the Galaxy Watch 6, we noted some minor issues with heart-rate accuracy. Samsung’s latest BioActive sensor makes improvements on this front. The heart-rate readings of the Galaxy Watch 7 proved spot-on ... An iterative update to the best Android-based smartwatch
Rating: 4 ​
🌐
DC Rainmaker
dcrainmaker.com › 2024 › 07 › samsung-galaxy-watch-ultra-finally-accurate.html
Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra In-Depth Review: Finally Accurate? | DC Rainmaker
August 4, 2024 - I did have one scenario on the Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra where an activity mysteriously stopped/ended during a ride, but I don’t know why. It started a new automatic activity, though that doesn’t record GPS. I then re-started a manual activity and it was fine. I had many more instances of this on the Galaxy Watch 7, even despite enabling water lock just in case I was somehow inadvertently ending it via sweat or something.
Find elsewhere
🌐
Wareable
wareable.com › home › samsung galaxy watch ultra vs. galaxy watch 7: key differences explained
Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra vs. Galaxy Watch 7: Key differences explained - Wareable
November 20, 2024 - The Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra is a big upgrade and you pay for that extra day of battery life. It’s available for around $649/£599. The Galaxy Watch 7 has always been good value, and starts at around $299/£289 for the 40mm size.
🌐
Android Central
androidcentral.com › wearables › samsung galaxy watch
Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra review: Stronger than expected | Android Central
Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra review: Stronger than expected
Most importantly, Samsung patched a serious issue with the Galaxy Watch Ultra and Galaxy Watch 7 a few weeks after launch. During my initial review, the battery drained so quickly that I found it hard to recommend paying so much for so little upside. The Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra has a bright display, fast performance, surprisingly accurate tracking, and respectable battery life. If only it didn't cost so much!
Rating: 4.5 ​
🌐
Reddit
reddit.com › r/galaxywatch › hows your experience with the watch 7?
r/GalaxyWatch on Reddit: Hows your experience with the Watch 7?
August 31, 2024 -

I bought the watch 7 like a week ago. Its my first smart watch. I am liking it so far. Other than GPS features in exercises, i have tried everything i think.

With AOD on, Bluetooth on, Location on, 7 apps notifications allowed, Gestures on, Adaptive brightness on, Sleep tracking on, Heart sensor measures continuously: Getting about 2.2 days of battery life. From the battery usage screen, after using the whole battery, it shows AOD used about 50-60% of it. Havnt tried it with AOD off yet, hopefully that puts it to 3 days.

Whats your experience with the watch, esp if you have used other smart watches before. Hows the sensor accuracy, asking because samsung made a big deal about it in their Launch.

And should i put a protector on the glass? Its sapphire so i was wondering if i could go naked with this.

Any suggestions and opinions are appreciated. Good day

🌐
Android Police
androidpolice.com › home › smartwatches & wearables › samsung galaxy watch 7 vs. galaxy watch ultra: which wearable is right for you?
Samsung Galaxy Watch 7 vs. Galaxy Watch Ultra: Which wearable is right for you?
September 7, 2024 - Additionally, without the physical rotating bezel of the Classic line, the Watch 7's haptic bezel steps in as a decent, albeit still flawed, alternative. In another good move, Samsung doubled internal storage to 32GB, making it much easier to store more apps and offline music. You get the same IP68 dust and water resistance and MIL-STD-810H durability the Galaxy Watch Ultra offers, too, so on paper, it seems like the two are on the same page.
🌐
PhoneArena
phonearena.com › home › reviews
Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra vs Galaxy Watch 7: Rugged vs stylish - PhoneArena
February 21, 2025 - The watch is half the price of the Ultra, and will get you everything you need, barring the rugged casing and the larger battery. The Watch 7 also comes in two different sizes, and two different connectivity options, so there's added flexibility.
🌐
YouTube
m.youtube.com › watch
Galaxy Watch 7 Hands-On Review: Battery, Sleep Scores, AI ...
Share your videos with friends, family, and the world
Published   April 8, 2025
🌐
Gadgets 360
gadgets360.com › home › wearables › wearables reviews › samsung galaxy watch ultra review: an ultra watch for samsung users
Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra Review: Premium Design and Features at a Price | Gadgets 360
October 29, 2024 - Design and battery life aside, this is pretty much your standard Galaxy Watch 7. Written by Sheldon Pinto, Edited by Ketan Pratap | Updated: 29 October 2024 12:23 IST · The Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra has a unique design which is highly subjective
🌐
Tom's Guide
tomsguide.com › wellness › smartwatches
Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra review | Tom's Guide
Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra review
It also has the same Galaxy AI-powered ... Watch 7, as well as Samsung's latest BioActive sensor and new 3 nanometer processor. Beyond that, everything else you'll need to know about this watch, and whether it's right for you, can be found in my full Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra review ... This is Samsung's sportiest smartwatch yet
Rating: 4 ​
🌐
Samsung Community
r1.community.samsung.com › australia › wearables
A rant about the Galaxy Watch 7 - Samsung Members
January 11, 2025 - What really made me regret this purchase is that in my old watch -even though it was experimental- gestures worked waaaaay better than this watch 7, universal gestures on the watch 4 worked flawlessly and I used it all the time, while in the watch 7 I had to disable double pinch because it kept answering my incoming calls just by lifting my arm to see who's calling.. This is simply not acceptable. Lots of reviewers already mentioned the sensor data and tracking are not good but I don't have a better tracker to compare and frankly would have forgiven it if that was the only issue, but as a package it unfortunately fails miserably.
🌐
WIRED
wired.com › review › samsung-galaxy-watch-ultra
Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra Review: Blood Sugar Index and Navigation Features | WIRED
July 24, 2024 - It's remarkably consistent with what I track on my Oura ring—for example, if the Oura said my heart rate was 69, the live reading on the Galaxy Watch Ultra was 70. The other new feature is the AGEs index. According to Samsung, the Galaxy Watch 7 and Watch Ultra can measure your advanced glycation ...
🌐
HotHardware
hothardware.com › reviews › samsung-galaxy-watch-ultra-review
Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra Review: Feature-Rich But Bodacious | HotHardware
Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra Review: Feature-Rich But Bodacious
On the other hand, there's really no way to dress the Watch Ultra up for a more formal event. Samsung's dearth of bands for the new connector limits your styling options greatly. The Galaxy Watch 7, however, is hundreds of dollars cheaper with a sleeker design, and it has almost all the same ... The Galaxy Watch Ultra goes spec for spec with the Apple Watch Ultra, but the high price tag and chunky design might make it a tough sell for some.
Rating: 3.5 ​