I have never even heard of using "I'ld", although I may not be the most authoritative source. I guess the point of contractions is to take out letters, though, and it certainly is a contraction of "I would", but I would never use it because it seems more awkward and it is one more letter than the conventionally accepted "I'd". Also, how does this person pronounce it? It seems like it would be very weird, at least with the possible expected pronunciations of /ɪld/, /aʊld/, and /aɪld/. Answer from Deleted User on reddit.com
WordReference
forum.wordreference.com › english only › english only
It'd = It would? [Contraction with 'would'] | WordReference Forums
January 12, 2017 - Well, the term "contraction" to me means "written contraction". If we're talking about speech, then unstressed "would" and "had" can, in the appropriate environments, become either /əd/ or /d/.
Grammarly
grammarly.com › blog › grammar › contractions
What Are Contractions in Writing? Definition and Examples | Grammarly
August 10, 2022 - Only certain words can be contracted: ... he/she/it, they), and modal verbs (can, will, might, must, should, would, could). Even though they represent multiple words, contractions act as a single word. Moreover, contractions all have a definite spelling, which means you can’t ...
Videos
08:53
Speak English Naturally with WOULD contractions: I'D, YOU'D, HE'D... ...
05:30
Learn English Contractions using HAVE | Could've, Would've, ...
04:50
Learn Contractions using WILL | Pronunciation and Grammar - YouTube
14:47
Repeat-After-Me + Shadowing Practice | Contractions with Would ...
What is the difference between an abbreviation and a contraction?
Abbreviations and contractions are both used to shorten a word, but in different ways. · An abbreviation is formed using the initial letters (or sometimes other parts) of a longer word or phrase to represent the whole. Common examples include “Mr.” for “Mister,” “Dr.” for “Doctor,” and “NASA” for “National Aeronautics and Space Administration.” They are used in formal writing as well as everyday conversations. · A contraction, on the other hand, is formed by combining two words and omitting one or more letters. The deleted letters are replaced with an apostrophe (e.g., “cannot” becomes “can’t”
scribbr.com
scribbr.com › home › contractions (grammar) | definition & examples
Contractions (Grammar) | Definition & Examples
What is the difference between a contraction and a portmanteau?
Contractions and portmanteaus are similar in that they are both formed by combining two words and omitting some letters. However, there is a difference between them: · Contractions usually combine two words that are often used together (e.g., “do not” becomes “don’t”). A contraction has the same meaning as its uncontracted form. · A portmanteau is formed by blending two words together to create a new word with a different meaning. For example, “brunch” is a combination of “breakfast” and “lunch.” This is also called a neologism.
scribbr.com
scribbr.com › home › contractions (grammar) | definition & examples
Contractions (Grammar) | Definition & Examples
What are contractions (words)?
Contractions are short words that are made by combining two words. This is often done by deleting certain letters and replacing them with an apostrophe (e.g., “do not” becomes “don’t”). · Although contractions are common in everyday speech, they should generally be avoided in formal or academic writing. However, there are exceptions (e.g., when writing dialogue in a story or directly quoting an author who uses contractions in your paper). · A good rule of thumb is to consider your audience and the intended effect of your writing when deciding whether to use contractions.
scribbr.com
scribbr.com › home › contractions (grammar) | definition & examples
Contractions (Grammar) | Definition & Examples
San Jose State University
sjsu.edu › writingcenter › docs › handouts › Contractions.pdf pdf
San José State University Writing Center www.sjsu.edu/writingcenter
By definition, a contraction is a shortened form of a group of words.
Reddit
reddit.com › r/grammar › question: i am having a hard time trying to figure out if “i'ld“ (for “i would”) is a correct word/contraction or not. i really, sincerely believe, that “i’d” is the only correct form and spelling, isn’t it?
r/grammar on Reddit: Question: I am having a hard time trying to figure out if “I'ld“ (for “I would”) is a correct word/contraction or not. I really, sincerely believe, that “I’d” is the only correct form and spelling, isn’t it?
April 2, 2019 -
I only know ONE person, that uses the contraction “I’ld”, and she believes that this is an okay form to use. I really want to prove my friend wrong.
Top answer 1 of 8
16
I have never even heard of using "I'ld", although I may not be the most authoritative source. I guess the point of contractions is to take out letters, though, and it certainly is a contraction of "I would", but I would never use it because it seems more awkward and it is one more letter than the conventionally accepted "I'd". Also, how does this person pronounce it? It seems like it would be very weird, at least with the possible expected pronunciations of /ɪld/, /aʊld/, and /aɪld/.
2 of 8
14
“I’ld” is a seemingly antiquated contraction mostly used now by older people, apparently. While I think it’s technically correct, I think you’d be better off using “I’d” in virtually any situation.
Speakspeak
speakspeak.com › resources › english-grammar-rules › various-grammar-rules › apostrophe-d-had-or-would
‘d = “had” or “would”
May 15, 2018 - The contraction I’d can mean “I would” or “I had”. Here are some similar examples: You’d = you would or you had He’d = he would or he had She’d = she…
Top answer 1 of 5
22
I would must be followed by an infinitive without to ( or perfect infinitive as in I would have gone). I had must be followed either by an object (a noun phrase, e.g. I had a little lamb, in which meaning it is rarely contracted) or by a verb's past participle. So it's (almost) always possible to distinguish between them by analyzing the words that follow.
Examples:
I'd go. (go = infinitive => 'd = would)
I'd had. (had = participle => 'd = had)
The only ambiguous case is when the verb's infinitive coincides with its participle.
I'd put. (could be would or had)
But these cases are rare and the meaning can be deduced if more context is provided
2 of 5
2
It will usually be clear from the context. For example, in the sentence I’d like to have a million dollars, I’d can only be a contraction of I would. By contrast, in I’d been there some time, it can only be a contraction of I had.
Scribbr
scribbr.com › home › contractions (grammar) | definition & examples
Contractions (Grammar) | Definition & Examples
May 2, 2025 - Contractions are words or phrases that have been shortened by omitting one or more letters (e.g., “You’re”).
Cambridge Dictionary
dictionary.cambridge.org › grammar › british-grammar › contractions
Contractions - Grammar - Cambridge Dictionary
+ object + infinitive or -ing Help somebody (to) do Look forward to Stop + -ing form or to-infinitive Verb patterns: verb + infinitive or verb + -ing? Verb patterns: verb + that-clause Verb patterns: with and without objects Would like Would rather, would sooner Phrasal verbs and multi-word verbs ... Get passive Have something done Passive: forms Passives with and without an agent Passive: uses Passive: other forms Passive: typical errors ... Can Could Could, may and might Dare Had better May Might Modality: forms Modality: meanings and uses Modality: tense Modality: other verbs Modality: other modal words and expressions Must Need Ought to Shall Should Will Would
GCFGlobal
edu.gcfglobal.org › en › grammar › contractions › 1
Grammar: Contractions
The apostrophe goes in its place, right between the n and t. Let's look at another example. You'll means you will. This contraction is missing two letters from the word will: w and i.
YouTube
youtube.com › learn english with emma [engvid]
Speak English Naturally with WOULD contractions: I'D, YOU'D, HE'D... - YouTube
Want to sound more like a native speaker? In this lesson, I will teach you many "would" contractions that native speakers use frequently without thinking abo...
Published June 15, 2015 Views 665K
Langeek
langeek.co › home › grammar › punctuation and spelling › contractions
"Contractions" in English Grammar | LanGeek
3 weeks ago - If the contractions are confusing, it's better to avoid them. For example: "she'd" can be both "she had" and "she would", so if the context of the sentence cannot clarify which meaning is intended, it's best to avoid using it.
Quora
quora.com › Hed-is-a-contraction-of-he-would-Wouldve-is-a-contraction-of-would-have-Is-it-ok-to-write-hedve-as-a-contraction-of-he-would-have
'He'd' is a contraction of 'he would'. 'Would've' is a contraction of 'would have'. Is it ok to write 'he'd've' as a contraction of 'he would have'? - Quora
Answer (1 of 10): Thanks for the A2A, Barney. Yes, it is absolutely okay. I can see why people might think it looks a bit odd, with two apostrophes in quick succession, but it's perfectly right. In Jane Austen’s time they did this with contractions like “sha'n't” and “wo'n't,” but we don't do t...
Reddit
reddit.com › r/linguistics › why is "i'd" a contraction for either "i would" or "i had" but not "i should"?
r/linguistics on Reddit: Why is "I'd" a contraction for either "I would" or "I had" but not "I should"?
November 9, 2018 -
Both "would" and "should" are modal verbs so is there some fundamental reason why one can be contracted and the other cannot?
Top answer 1 of 4
55
Because the "sh" sound is so strong that it doesn't get dropped. /w/ and /h/ are both quite weak so they're easily dropped.
2 of 4
49
There's basically never a "fundamental" reason for things like this. The explanation likely has to do with multiple factors: -as one user already mentioned, the "sh" sound is stronger. Another way of thinking of this is that the path of sound change it would take to get from this sound to nothing is longer. -there are good reasons why we wouldn't want to conflate meanings like "would" vs. "should". "Would" and "had" need different verb forms after them so we can distinguish them even if the words themselves are contracted. But "would" and "should" need the same forms, so they'd be indistinguishable. -Things like contraction happen more often with very common words. But "should" is significantly less common in usage than the other two words, so we would expect it to be less subject to those processes.
Gymglish
gymglish.com › homepage › online english lessons › grammar rules: learn and improve - gymglish › contractions: 'would' vs 'had'
Contractions: 'would' vs 'had': How and When to Use - Gymglish
The auxiliary verbs would and had are both contracted to 'd. How can they be distinguished? • Would is always followed by a verb in the infinitive without the to:
engVid
engvid.com › contractions-for-have-be-would-will
CONTRACTIONS for HAVE, BE, WOULD, WILL: ’d, ’s, ’ve, ’re, ’m, ’ll engVid
2) He sad he’d(would)put it on the table. Do we guess the right meaning only from the context? ... thanks James for this lesson I got 9/10 all ‘Lycan’ tell you is that you ‘rock’ some pokemon jokes from Lycanrock lol. :) ... 8 out of 10 I think that’t not bad. I have a question and it is can you do contraction ...
Learn English
learnenglish.ecenglish.com › lessons › contractions
Contractions | Learn English
Native speakers usually use contractions especially when speaking. We make contractions by connecting two or more words together. One or more letters are removed from the words when they are connected. ... There would → There'd → "There'd have been more people here if the party had been ...
EnglishClass101
englishclass101.com › lesson › ask-alisha-your-english-questions-answered-177-speak-english-naturally-with-would-contractions-id-youd-hed
Speak English Naturally with WOULD contractions: I'D, YOU'D, HE'D... - EnglishClass101
In this lesson, you'll learn about the "would" contractionsVisit EnglishClass101 and learn English fast with real lessons by real teachers.
Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org › wiki › Contraction_(grammar)
Contraction (grammar) - Wikipedia
3 weeks ago - In general, any monosyllabic word ending in e caduc (schwa) contracts if the following word begins with a vowel, h or y (as h is silent and absorbed by the sound of the succeeding vowel; y sounds like i). In addition to ce → c'- (demonstrative pronoun "that"), these words are que → qu'- (conjunction, relative pronoun, or interrogative pronoun "that"), ne → n'- ("not"), se → s'- ("himself", "herself", "itself", "oneself" before a verb), je → j'- ("I"), me → m'- ("me" before a verb), te → t'- (informal singular "you" before a verb), le or la → l'- ("the"; or "he", "she", "it" before a verb or after an imperative verb and before the word y or en), and de → d'- ("of"). Unlike with English contractions, however, those contractions are mandatory: one would never say (or write) *ce est or *que elle.