I think this is related to why Mac is doing so well. They have a simple product line that most people can understand. Either in phones or laptops, most people can easily figure out what they want. They know what they are getting. The PC/Android market has way too much choice and way too much confusion for most customers to deal with. More on reddit.com

Welp there you have it Real-world application code is incredibly varied, and Geekbench is designed to reflect that by using a broad range of workloads written in different styles. BOT undermines this by replacing that varied code with processor-tuned, fully optimized binaries, measuring peak rather than typical performance. If BOT worked with every application, we wouldn’t have concerns with its use with Geekbench. It is an interesting optimization technique that has some drawbacks (the two-second startup delay being one of them, especially for short-lived processes). However, right now, BOT only supports a handful of applications, meaning BOT-optimized benchmark results paint an unrealistic picture of how a CPU performs in practice. This makes Intel processors appear faster relative to AMD and other vendors than they would be in typical, real-world usage. .. We will continue to flag BOT-optimized results in the Geekbench Browser. BOT optimizations are poorly documented, aggressive in scope, and damage comparability with other CPUs. For example, BOT allows Intel processors to run vector instructions while other processors continue to run scalar instructions. More on reddit.com

Her content is great, i remember the first time watching something of hers thinking that something's fishy, it's too good, there has to be a catch More on reddit.com

Always pointless with these lists, but I expected the original 8086, the Q6600, and the i7 920 and I was not disappointed. More on reddit.com