The other comments are correct: is undefined. Similarly, the limit of
as
approaches
is also undefined. However, if you take the limit of
as
approaches zero from the left or from the right, you get negative and positive infinity respectively.
Like 10/2- imagine a 10 square foot box, saying 10 divided by 2 is like saying “how many 2 square foot boxes fit in this 10 square foot box?” So the answer is 5.
But if you take the same box and ask “how many boxes that are infinitely small, or zero feet squared, can fit in the same box the answer would be infinity not “undefined”. So 10/0=infinity.
I understand why 2/0 can’t be 0 not only because that doesn’t make and since but also because it could cause terrible contradictions like 1=2 and such.
Ah math is so cool. I love infinity so if anyone wants to talk about it drop a comment.
Edit: thanks everyone so much for the answers. Keep leaving comments though because I’m really enjoying seeing it explained in different ways. Also it doesn’t seem like anyone else has ever been confused by this judging by the comment but if anyone is I really liked this video https://www.khanacademy.org/math/algebra/x2f8bb11595b61c86:foundation-algebra/x2f8bb11595b61c86:division-zero/v/why-dividing-by-zero-is-undefined
The other comments are correct: is undefined. Similarly, the limit of
as
approaches
is also undefined. However, if you take the limit of
as
approaches zero from the left or from the right, you get negative and positive infinity respectively.
does tend to
as you approach zero from the left, and
as you approach from the right:

That these limits are not equal is why is undefined.
Videos
sorry if the question doesnt make sense i havent been invested in math theory for long as ive only taken alg 2 and minor precalc but why is it that one over infinity equals zero rather than an infinitely small finite number? from my thoughts i feel as if it cant be zero because if you have anumerator there is a value no matter the size of a denominator, almost like an asymptotic relationship with the value reaching closer to zero but never hitting it. i understand zero is a concept so you cant operate with it so you cant exactly create a proof algebraicly but then how could you know it equals zero? just need second thoughts as its a comment debate between me and my brother. many thanks!
edit: my bad i wasnt very misunderstood on alot of things and the question was pretty dumb in hindsight, my apologies
I saw too many people saying this statement is true but its not I can prove it. Sometimes you find the limit of a function with an "a" integer 0/0 so you change the function form and make with a known form and limit of a/0+ is infinite there cant be 0/0 is infinite ..
So I was solving some calculus questions primarily dealing with lhôpital rule
Here is the question
lim x tends to 0 (1+sinx)^1/x²
Now what I did was to take the natural log of the function as we know that e^lnf(x)=e^L
A1: 1/x² ln(1+sinx)
A2: ln(1+sinx)/x²
A3:Applying the lhôpital rule
1/(1+sinx)/2x (note I am neglecting the derivative of (1+sinx) which we will get)
Now here I am having question
Can I substitute x=0 and say infinity?
Then prove that e^infinity = undefined and thus limit DNE?
or should I just stop at A3 step?
Or did I just get entire question wrong?
S
ol