Hello, starting to learn about exchanges but havent been able to properly understand difference between dealer market and auction market. Hoping someone can help me out.
I understand that NYSE is auction, and that they pretty much just serve as a room to gather buyers and sellers. These buyers and sellers use stock brokers to place orders that get matched by the exchange's "specialist".
However, how is this different that the dealer market?
Dealer market doesnt have physical grounds but isnt it the same thing? Buyers and sellers place their order and the market maker matches them. I guess im confused as to what market makers actually do.
Im sorry if this is wayy too dumb to be on this subreddit, and hope you have a great day.
Videos
Our office talk (especially lately) has been about the ups and downs of the DJIA. I never understood how that works in relation to the S&P500, the NYSE, and Nasdaq. Bonus Question - what's all the screaming and yelling on the NYSE floor, and does Nasdaq even have that?
Total noob to stock markets and investing here.
I was driving in my car today and a question popped into my head: why are some stocks listed on the NYSE while others are on the NASDAQ, and so on?
Why aren't all stocks simply traded on one single exchange? What are the benefits/drawbacks for a company to be on one exchange versus another? Do traders have to go through different hurdles to trade on one exchange versus another?
Thanks!
For the past 40+ years, nasdaq has continually outperformed the s&p 500, essentially over almost any time period. So why is S&P always suggested as the index to invest in and never nasdaq?
Now, I understand that nasdaq is heavily weighted towards tech and the S&P is more diversified. But this should not matter if, over the long term, s&p is outperformed by nasdaq. By quite a significant amount over 40 years as well.
So what gives? What am I missing? Is it solely the advice of diversification over historically less average annual gains?
Spirit Airlines ($SAVE) just announced a move from NDAQ to NYSE.
What's the benefit? Is the verbiage about how the board believes "the transfer is in the best interests of Spirit's stockholders" just a way of saying it will save the company money but not matter to shareholders at all?
-
costs: NYSE might offer them a deal on fees because the listing brings trading volume which means money for the exchange
-
Filing requirements: I think nyse has more requirement than nasdaq but maybe not
-
inclusion in certain indices: For example, if you want to be in the Nasdaq 100 (QQQ Etf) you need to be nasdaq listed. NYSE has the NYSE Composite. However, each index only allows so many of the same industry which means you need to switch exchanges to get on a major index and get that volume boost.
Probably fees. Pepsi moved from NYSE to NDAQ the other day, SAVE the reverse today. I don't really pay attention to it.
I'm looking to subscribe to level 2 market data, and these are my two options for NASDAQ and NYSE.
So far I haven't found a difference in the securities these two support.
So what would be the difference between them? Range of securities? Level of depth? Something else?
Hi everyone, I believe I'm missing some fundamental knowledge on how trading works. I've always wondered what is the difference between the NASDAQ shown at the top and the NASDAQ shown in the Level 2?
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe the NASDAQ at the top tells which exchange the stock GOVX is listed on. In this case, it's listed on the NASDAQ, but I frequently see NYSE and AMEX also.
I'm confused why the Level 2 has bids/offers from other exchanges. If the stock is listed on the NASDAQ, shouldn't it have quotes only from the NASDAQ? I can see that there also quotes from the NYSE, ARCA, and EDGX as well. What am I missing here?
Everytime I see OTC I think it’s weird, but not much else. I know listing requirements are far less but was curious if anyone had insights into the structural differences between OTC and the standard markets.
Thanks!
I read about both of them and still confused
Are they corporations or what? Every day on the local news they talk about those two and I'm not sure what their significance is.
Hi,
I was searching the difference between Nasdaq 100 and Nasdaq Composite on the Internet. I came across a forum message where a man said that Nasdaq Composite is made of all american and foreign companies listed on Nasdaq and Nasdaq 100 only the top 100 companies listed on Nasdaq.
First, is this true ? And finally, what does "listed on Nasdaq" mean ? What really is Nasdaq ? I'm a bit lost... Here's the original topic if you wanna read it, but use Google Translate (it's in french).
Thanks.
I get that it’s more volatile than the SP 500 but if you keep your money in long term, won’t you come out ahead regardless? I’m just really confused because my wealth advisor ( who is a different person than my fiduciary advisor) told me that if you invest into the stock market long term you’ll be ahead.
Yet, they think investing in the Nasdaq long term is not a good idea and the NASDAQ’s growth is unsustainable. But hasn’t NASDAQ been outperforming the SP 500 for decades? don’t most of the companies on it just get bigger and better over time?
I get that NASDAQ is tech heavy but why does that even scare investors off If society is so tech focused anyway? I did ask the wealth advisor these questions and he couldn’t give me an answer. All he could really say was that fidelity has been doing this 30 years and doesn’t think tracking the Nasdaq long term is a good idea. Even for someone my age ( I am 30)
NYSE is New York Stock Exchange: a stock market in which stocks are bought and sold the old fashioned way by human traders. Makes a good place for news cameras to capture footage of actual traders face palming at their monitors.
DJIA is the Dow Jones Industrial Average: a market index that is sort of like a sum of the stock prices of 30 major American companies. This serves as an indicator of trader's confidence in owning stock in large American companies.
NASDAQ is a stock exchange which is entirely electronic. No exciting backdrops of human traders scurrying around a trading floor, just boring computers with blinking lights pushing trillions of dollars around.
The Nasdaq Composite index is sort of a combined sum of the prices of all 3000+ stocks traded on the NASDAQ, some of which are not American companies. This serves as an indicator of traders overall confidence in owning stocks in general.
The S&P 500 is yet another market index that tracks the price trends of the 500 biggest stocks traded on NYSE and NASDAQ, where "biggest" = biggest market cap = stock price * number of shares
It is important to know that stock market indexes are not "the economy" any more so than today's baseball scores sums up all of "sports", but these indexes can reflect how stock traders feel about the economy, or at least how they feel about owning stocks.
Let's forget for a moment that we're talking about the stock market and pretend that we're making teams of "fantasy redditors". We are going to hold a competition between 3 teams to see who can rack up the most average karma in 1 week.
Each team has a captain, the captains names are: Donald, Nancy, and Stephen.
Rules
-
Each captain can pick as many redditors as they want on their team.
-
If a captain would like to, they can use a weighted average for the more popular reddit contributors.
-
A redditor can be on multiple teams simultaneously
Team Selection
Donald chooses the top 30 redditors throughout the entire community and opts for the weighted average approach. As such, his top two redditors will contribute more to his team's average karma.
Nancy, on the other hand, decides that she wants every single redditor that subscribes to r/technology. As such, her team is comprised of 3,000 redditors and she uses a basic average karma of all 3,000.
Stephen decides that he will hand pick 500 redditors for his team and he will use a basic average of karma. Keep in mind, that it is entirely possible that some of Stephen's team selection could already be on Nancy or Donald's team, and that's totally cool as it is within the rules.
At the end of each day for the next week, the average karma for each team is calculated. It could be that Donald's team karma increased by 10%, Nancy's team karma decreased by 5%, and Stephen's team karma increased by 7%. Whichever team at the end of the week has the largest overall gain in karma is the winner.
The scores of each team would be entirely dependent on the reddit community at-large, what with its continuous upvoting/downvoting.
So, to make this analogous to stock market indices, just imagine that our Team Captains are actually just named different: Donald = Dow Jones, Nancy = NASDAQ, and Stephen = S&P 500. The constant swings in the market are traders/investors buying/selling the same way that redditors upvote/downvote and at the end of the day we have an aggregate output.
Instead of picking redditors, these Team Captains pick companies that are traded publicly.
How does this apply to what people do with their money? Well, many investors, instead of picking a single company to own, will often put money into an investment vehicle that moves with one of the indices.
Im looking to invest a lump sum and then additional monthly sums. From my research the Nasdaq100 consistently outperforms the S&P500 every year in terms of growth, however I see almost always people on here suggesting that folks invest into the S&P500. Why is that? What am I missing?
So, while I know that the NASDAQ 100 is very tech focused and you should strive to diversify the returns have been much better all things considered.
Yes, the tech sector has been doing great the past two decades and I really can’t find any reliable source on NASDAQ 100 returns prior to that.
Going through a back test calculator on both investments starting 2007 (that’s the time it lets me go the farthest in time for NASDAQ) the returns are quite favorable for NASDAQ.
NASDAQ data: https://curvo.eu/backtest/portfolio/full-bull--NoIgYgrgNlAEBC0ogDTFASQKIAYfwFYBmAZQC14BGATlUoF1Gg?config=%7B%22investmentPatterns%22%3A%5B%5B%22one-off%22%2C14000%5D%2C%5B%22recurrent%22%2C1%2C1250%5D%5D%2C%22transactionFee%22%3A1.9%2C%22managementFee%22%3A0.33%7D
S&P 500 data: https://curvo.eu/backtest/portfolio/test--NoIgKgpgzgLiA0xQEkCiAGdAhAYgWQA0CARAVgBYEBGAXTqA?config=%7B%22investmentPatterns%22%3A%5B%5B%22one-off%22%2C14000%5D%2C%5B%22recurrent%22%2C1%2C200%5D%5D%2C%22transactionFee%22%3A1.9%2C%22managementFee%22%3A0.07%2C%22periodStart%22%3A%222007-07%22%7D
After looking at the numbers you can see the NASDAQ is just returning more overall.
Now the problem is should I just put all the money into it or go with the S&P for more diversification and much less fluctuations? Or maybe is it worth to buy both and just adjust the percentage?