I'm creating a world for my DnD campaign. And I would love it to be a complete world which I perfectly understand (a daunting task, I know, we will see how I do). Therefore I wanted to start at the beginning...
And that's where the problem arose. The beginning of the universe is somewhat incomprehensible for us mere humans. Even if The Big Bang is a thing it does not describe where all the stuff comes from. That's what I'm interested in.
The easiest solution is to say that everything always existed and avoid the question. Then the inevitable conflict between nothing and something (everything) begins.
Now is the time to ask the question: "What is the opposite of The Void?"
If we have a fancy name for the nothingness, The Void, what is the fancy name for the everything?
I have found my answer but I am curious what you guys can come up with.
Select the antonym of void
Need Help Coming Up With an Antonym for Void
html - what are the opposite of void tags called? - Stack Overflow
Difference between void and non-void functions in C++ - Stack Overflow
How does the adjective 'void' contrast with its synonyms?
Some common synonyms of void are blank, empty, vacant, and vacuous. While all these words mean "lacking contents which could or should be present," void suggests absolute emptiness as far as the mind or senses can determine.
// a statement void of meaning
In what contexts can 'vacuous' take the place of 'void'?
Although the words vacuous and void have much in common, vacuous suggests the emptiness of a vacuum and especially the lack of intelligence or significance.
// a vacuous facial expression
When can 'vacant' be used instead of 'void'?
In some situations, the words vacant and void are roughly equivalent. However, vacant suggests an absence of appropriate contents or occupants.
// a vacant apartment
Greetings, my fellow fantasy fans and authors! Tonight, I come seeking your guidance and insights in trying to put into words a core concept and setting in my story.
To make a very, VERY long story short, the series of books I am trying to write deals with various characters and kingdoms coming to grips with and facing a multiversal collapse.
Basically, at the most basal strata of my setting exists what could best be described as a sea of energy. And this sea is filled to the brim with eldritch entities and creatures whose mere motions, let alone machinations, cause waves within the energy which coalesce into the physical laws upon which realities, which I call Ordered Spheres, are built. Most of which are built accidently via the machinations of Courts, unions of smaller, sentient entities, trying to keep their larger, more bestial kin subdued in an attempt to both feed on them and keep themselves from being fed upon. However, by the time my various stories have begun, something has caused the greater kin to awaken, which has caused the Courts to disperse, which is causing the laws and structure of the Ordered Spheres to collapse.
Now my question, and what I need your help with, dear reader, is what can I call this primal sea?
One thing I am trying to subvert is the idea of the " Void" or emptiness, as that is where most eldritch or Lovecraft coded creatures are often described as coming from. Things like "the void between stars" or "the void at the heart of creation." Rather, I want to go with the idea that not only is there something beyond the characters' known worlds, but this something is teeming with matter, energy, and life on such a scale as to make survival, let alone fixing the collapse, seem as short lived as a mayfly's dream.
So, any thoughts on a word or words that you can think of that could be used as an antonym for "void," or denotes an abundance or something full would be most appreciated, along with any thoughts, questions, or criticisms of whatvi have presented would be most appreciated.
Thanks for taking the time to read and comment, and I hope you have a wonderful rest of your week.
In HTML you have void elements. These are elements which cannot have any child nodes. Elements which are not void elements are non-void elements.
In HTML <img> is a start tag. <img /> is a start tag with a / in it (the / has no special meaning). <div> is a start tag. </div> is an end tag.
In XML <foo /> is an empty-element tag. (Start and end tags are the same).
According to this list https://www.w3.org/TR/html/syntax.html#writing-html-documents-elements on the same page what @corgrath referred to they call them normal elements. (Mentioning another 3 categories beyond void and normal).
If your function has no reason to return something, it shouldn't return anything, i.e., it should return void. There is no point in giving a function which doesn't produce any result an artificial return value.
If you function has a reason to return something, e.g., because it can fail, it should return the corresponding result. Since the result will be meaningful, it won't be ignored, i.e., there is no optimization potential for not returning value.
Where things do become interesting is when returning massive objects: the potential copy happening may be expensive and there is also a speed advantage with respect to reusing memory. However, these considerations don't apply to any of built-in types.
In terms of memory and speed, the difference between void DoSomething(); and bool DoSomething(); is likely negligible. Choosing between them depends on the function's intended purpose: use void for actions without a return value and bool if you foresee needing to convey a boolean result. The unused return value may not significantly impact performance, but it's good practice to align the return type with the expected behavior of the function.