Playwright is puppeteerv2. There is no reason to choose puppeteer over playwright in 2024 Answer from computerjunkie7410 on reddit.com
Medium
medium.com › front-end-weekly › playwright-vs-puppeteer-choosing-the-right-browser-automation-tool-in-2024-d46d2cbadf71
Playwright vs Puppeteer: Choosing the Right Browser Automation Tool in 2024 | by Shanika Wickramasinghe | Frontend Weekly | Medium
May 15, 2024 - Puppeteer also supports network interception, but it might require additional setup for more complex scenarios. Playwright supports detailed performance testing, which helps in optimizing web page performance.
Videos
07:04
Playwright vs. Puppeteer: The Differences - YouTube
54:31
Selenium, Puppeteer or Playwright How to Choose - YouTube
03:53
How to Choose Between Playwright & Puppeteer for Web ...
03:53
How to Choose Between Playwright & Puppeteer for Web Scraping - ...
00:26
Learn the differences: #Playwright 🆚 #Puppeteer - see the full ...
Selenium vs Playwright vs Cypress vs Puppeteer | Ultimate Web ...
BrowserStack
browserstack.com › home › guide › playwright vs puppeteer: which to choose in 2025?
Playwright vs Puppeteer: Which to choose in 2025? | BrowserStack
October 22, 2025 - Complex Handling of Dynamic UIs: While Puppeteer is strong with Chromium, handling frequently changing selectors or highly dynamic SPAs requires careful scripting and can increase maintenance. Smaller Advanced Testing Ecosystem: Compared to Playwright, fewer built-in features exist for cross-browser testing, multiple contexts, or parallel fixture management, which may require custom solutions.
Reddit
reddit.com › r/softwaretesting › puppeteer or playwright?
r/softwaretesting on Reddit: Puppeteer or Playwright?
February 14, 2024 -
Hey. I'm in a situation where I have to choose either Puppeteer or Playwright. I'm interested in nothing else but maximum efficiency and stability, knowing that my scripts take hours/days to finish.
Thanks.
Top answer 1 of 7
24
Playwright is puppeteerv2. There is no reason to choose puppeteer over playwright in 2024
2 of 7
10
Choose playwright and get better at writing scripts, make sure they can run in parallel and don't use sleeps, use wait for element x to be visible before doing y if you need to wait. Or wait for the page to finish fully load the dom content Also don't bother with c# or java, they are full of syntax bloat. Choose python or TypeScript. Python may be a bit easier but TS has more features, however I have not needed them but they are very nice to have.
Contentful
contentful.com › blog › puppeteer-vs-playwright
Puppeteer vs. Playwright: Automated testing tools compared | Contentful
March 12, 2025 - While Puppeteer · focuses on Chromium-based browsers and Firefox, making it highly optimized for those environments, that fact naturally limits its cross-browser testing capabilities. Playwright has a much broader compatibility, supporting the three major browser engines: Chromium, Firefox, and WebKit (the engine behind Safari).
Thunderbit
thunderbit.com › blog › playwright-vs-puppeteer
Playwright vs Puppeteer: Detailed Comparison
June 17, 2025 - Both Playwright and Puppeteer share some pain points—especially when you scale up: Selector Fragility: Websites change. One tweak to a CSS class or page layout, and your script breaks (). Maintenance becomes a never-ending game of whack-a-mole. Manual Maintenance: Developers spend a lot of time fixing selectors, updating logic, and handling new anti-bot measures (). Performance Bottlenecks: Running real browsers is resource-intensive.
Bright Data
brightdata.com › blog › web-data › puppeteer-vs-playwright
Puppeteer vs Playwright for Web Scraping
September 16, 2025 - This speed advantage is partially attributed to Playwright’s consistent and significant updates, which have surpassed the more modest updates and bug fixes of Puppeteer. Moreover, Playwright’s ability to support cross-browser testing accelerates testing cycles across different browsers, further boosting its speed performance.