Reddit
reddit.com › r/springboot › restclient vs. webclient vs resttemplate - using the suitable library to call rest api in spring boot
r/SpringBoot on Reddit: RestClient vs. WebClient vs RestTemplate - Using the suitable library to call REST API in Spring Boot
February 7, 2025 - WebClient is for reactive development and RestClient is blocking and was proposed against the use of RestTemplate and many more clients were added to replace template based API like for JdbcTemplate we get JdbcClient
Medium
medium.com › @sunda.nitsri › rest-client-vs-webclient-vs-resttemplate-choosing-the-right-http-client-in-spring-boot-4937c67858b4
REST Client vs WebClient vs RestTemplate: Choosing the Right HTTP Client in Spring Boot | by Pankaj Sunda | Medium
March 28, 2025 - RestClient offers an intuitive API and supports both blocking and non-blocking calls. WebClient is the go-to for reactive applications.
RestClient vs. WebClient vs RestTemplate - Utiliser la librairie appropriée pour appeler une API REST dans Spring Boot
This is the place to discuss all things Spring and Spring Boot - from dependency injection and AOP to creating production-ready apps with ease. Whether you're a beginner exploring Spring or a pro diving into Spring Boot's auto-config magic, share tips, ask questions, and learn from the community ... More on reddit.com
5
28
February 7, 2025A comparison between RestClient, WebClient, and RestTemplate libraries for calling REST APIs in Spring Boot applications including recommendations on which one is the right choice for different s
On the section 'Final comparison and advice' OTEL support is yellow for WebClient and RestClient. Why is that? What features are missing from those 2 that are present in RestTemplate(green) Thanks for a great blog post! More on reddit.com
9
16
January 8, 2024RestClient vs. WebClient vs RestTemplate - Using the suitable library to call REST API in Spring Boot
Databrokers? nope. Social networks? Also nope. This post was deleted using Redact . fade aware public salt sip resolute truck childlike theory absorbed More on reddit.com
7
32
February 7, 2025When to use Open Feign and when not?
RestTemplate is not deprecated, it's feature complete meaning it will not longer have more features. It's fine to use it with spring boot 3 More on reddit.com
7
4
April 28, 202417:54
Creating REST Clients in Spring Boot 4 Just Got EASIER! - YouTube
🚀 New in Spring Framework 6.1: RestClient
Difference between RestClient, RestTemplate, WebClient
01:50
WebClient vs. RestTemplate: A Comparison for Modern Java Development ...
- YouTube
Medium
medium.com › @rakesh.mali › restclient-vs-webclient-vs-resttemplate-a-comprehensive-guide-6b150df476dd
RestClient vs. WebClient vs. RestTemplate: A Comprehensive Guide | by Rakesh Mali | Medium
March 7, 2025 - Use WebClient if you need a reactive, non-blocking approach. Use RestClient if you want a modern, easy-to-use alternative to RestTemplate without fully adopting WebClient.
Spring
docs.spring.io › spring-framework › reference › integration › rest-clients.html
REST Clients :: Spring Framework
If no request factory is specified ... it will use Java’s HttpClient. Finally, it will resort to the simple default. WebClient is a non-blocking, reactive client to perform HTTP requests....
GeeksforGeeks
geeksforgeeks.org › advance java › spring-webclient-vs-resttemplate
Spring - WebClient vs RestTemplate - GeeksforGeeks
July 9, 2026 - While RestTemplate provides a traditional synchronous and blocking approach, WebClient offers a modern reactive and non-blocking programming model designed for high-performance applications.
YouTube
youtube.com › watch
RestClient vs WebClient vs RestTemplate
To learn more, please visit the YouTube Help Center: https://www.youtube.com/help
Harmelodic
harmelodic.com › blog › restclient-vs-webclient-vs-resttemplate-configuring
RestClient vs. WebClient vs. RestTemplate (Configuring) - Harmelodic
This could be to handle different HTTP status codes in different ways or to manipulate the response in some way. Both RestTemplate and RestClient can return the ResponseEntity class (since the latter is built using the former), whereas WebClient uses the reactive ClientResponse class to allow you to work with HTTP responses whilst staying in the reactive ecosystem:
DevGenius
blog.devgenius.io › restclient-vs-webclient-a-senior-architects-guide-to-spring-s-http-clients-20714e2bb184
RestClient vs. WebClient: A Senior Architect’s Guide to Spring’s HTTP Clients | by Shweta Tyagi | Dev Genius
July 29, 2026 - WebClient showed up in 2017 alongside Spring WebFlux, Spring's reactive stack.
Baeldung
baeldung.com › home › http client-side › spring webclient vs. resttemplate
Spring WebClient vs. RestTemplate | Baeldung
May 11, 2024 - While RestTemplate uses the caller thread for each event (HTTP call), WebClient will create something like a “task” for each event.
Reddit
reddit.com › r › SpringBoot › comments › 1ijqu9q › restclient_vs_webclient_vs_resttemplate_using_the
RestClient vs. WebClient vs RestTemplate - Utiliser la ...
February 7, 2025 - This is the place to discuss all things Spring and Spring Boot - from dependency injection and AOP to creating production-ready apps with ease. Whether you're a beginner exploring Spring or a pro diving into Spring Boot's auto-config magic, share tips, ask questions, and learn from the community ...
Reddit
reddit.com › r/springboot › a comparison between restclient, webclient, and resttemplate libraries for calling rest apis in spring boot applications including recommendations on which one is the right choice for different s
r/SpringBoot on Reddit: A comparison between RestClient, WebClient, and RestTemplate libraries for calling REST APIs in Spring Boot applications including recommendations on which one is the right choice for different s
January 8, 2024 -
Choosing the Right Library for REST API Calls in Spring Boot: RestClient vs. WebClient vs. RestTemplate https://digma.ai/blog/restclient-vs-webclient-vs-resttemplate/
Top answer 1 of 2
2
On the section 'Final comparison and advice' OTEL support is yellow for WebClient and RestClient. Why is that? What features are missing from those 2 that are present in RestTemplate(green) Thanks for a great blog post!
2 of 2
1
To open more confusion, I'm using openfeign with okhttp to simplify.
LinkedIn
linkedin.com › posts › harshavardhankatkam_resttemplate-vs-restclient-vs-webclient-activity-7453374687193235456-qger
Spring HTTP Client Tradeoffs: RestTemplate, WebClient, ...
Login to LinkedIn to keep in touch with people you know, share ideas, and build your career.
Top answer 1 of 6
128
No, RestTemplate will continue to exist (at least for now). You don't have to replace it with WebClient. One of the main differences is RestTemplate is synchronous and blocking i.e. when you do a rest call you need to wait till the response comes back to proceed further. · But WebClient is complete opposite of this. The caller need not wait till response comes back. Instead he will be notified when there is a response. · If you need such a functionality, then yes you need to replace your Resttemplate with WebClient. You can in fact achieve Rest template like synchronous processing in webclient using .block(). But the other way is not possible. · EDIT: · RestTemplate is marked as feature complete in future version(> 5.0) and will not have new features added going forward
2 of 6
60
According to the Java Doc the RestTemplate will be in maintenance mode. Spring team advise to use the WebClient if possible: · NOTE: As of 5.0, the non-blocking, reactive org.springframework.web.reactive.client.WebClient offers a modern alternative to the RestTemplate with efficient support for both sync and async, as well as streaming scenarios. The RestTemplate will be deprecated in a future version and will not have major new features added going forward.
Foojay
foojay.io › home › spring: internals of restclient
Spring Framework – Internals of RestClient
March 31, 2024 - On the other hand, WebClient offered a more versatile solution as it supported both synchronous and asynchronous, non-blocking operations with a fluent API. However, even if we were not using it for reactive clients, we still needed to include ...
Google Translate
translate.google.com › translate
Battle of the Spring REST clients: RestTemplate, WebClient or RestClient? | Dimitri's tutorials
October 26, 2023 - The advantage of using RestClient is that it offers similar capabilities as WebClient, such as a modern, fluent API and the ability to use the HTTP exchange interface.
danvega.dev
danvega.dev › blog › rest-client-first-look
A First Look at the new Rest Client in Spring Boot 3.2
September 8, 2023 - The novelty here is that while you needed the WebClient to utilize HTTP interfaces in Spring Boot 3.0, Spring MVC applications that leverage RestClient can now use HTTP interfaces natively, sidestepping the need to add an additional dependency to your Maven configuration.
Websparrow
websparrow.org › home › spring resttemplate vs restclient
Spring RestTemplate vs RestClient - Websparrow
August 30, 2025 - RestClient – the modern, fluent, and more intuitive replacement introduced in Spring Framework 6. In this blog, we’ll cover both, compare their features, and see how to use them with practical code snippets. RestTemplate has been the go-to HTTP client in Spring for years. It’s easy to use, synchronous, and supports various HTTP methods. However, it’s considered deprecated in favour of WebClient (for reactive) and RestClient (for synchronous).